The roaming US #ExtremeRight is now successfully attempting to penalize #transidentity and any #activism in favor of #lgbtqia #rights. The most compationate attitude a #transgender person can expect from them is to be considered mentally ill and necessitating #conversiontherapy, which is nothing less than grave violations of basic #humanrights. While the #trump regime seems to be targeting only a tiny minority, their criteria will soon look a lot more wide-ranging.
https://youtu.be/o0MNrd96SjU
The Attack On Trans People Is Ramping Up

YouTube
While #transidentity and other varieites of #genrderorientation or #sexualorientation, seem to concern only a tiny minority, the issue at stake literally concerns everyone who isn't a rich white cis-hetero male over 50. And that issue is #patriarchy and #capitalism, which, together, ensure that anyone. who isn't wealthy male cis-hetero WASP is to be tightly controlled and exploited or even exterminated, if they are too "subversive". This concerns #LGBTQIA+, but right after, #jews and #muslims.

@ariane

All sorts of people are controlled all sorts of ways, and it's not capitalism that does it. Indeed, capitalism clearly prescribes FREE markets, open exchange, etc. It's a powerful tool to uplift the poor.

No, the primary instrument of oppression is the government. Ask yourself this; who has more power over you, right now; Jeff Bezos, of the local chief of police? Which one can send an armed man to your home with impunity?

@AlexanderKingsbury Actually, #capitalism has been literally built on the exploitation not only of former "serfs" in Europe,, but also of slaves and resources taken over by European capitalists through colonization. Free market has always only been for those who possess something to sell or to produce goods to sell. That is a minority of people. Everyone else is just there to serve these dominants, sometimes against an under-valued salary, sometimes just to be able to keep their life.
@AlexanderKingsbury #Capitalism bourgeoisie has always been able to engage the #government in their own interest, be it through placing people of their own cast in government, or by blackmailing government with suppression of labor and moving it abroad, in countries with more friendly government. Basically, #capitalists have been able to wriggle their way out of responsibilities with the help of more or less corrupt governments.

@ariane

You're deeply confused about what capitalism is. Capitalism clearly and directly forbids such things as slavery; slavery is in obvious contradiction to the very concept of a free market. Likewise government suppression of labor; also not in accord with a free market.

@AlexanderKingsbury Actually, you are the one who is deeply ignorant of the history of #capitalism. Because modern slavery and modern Western empires were literally born out of #capitalism. What made modern slavery illegal weren't capitalists, but humanists who felt that human dignity was more important than the wealth of a few privileged. If some considered themselves "liberals", most were socialist. And decolonization was the revolt of those colonized.

@ariane

Again, it's impossible for slavery to have been born from capitalism. Capitalism clearly directs free markets, which are in direct contradiction to slavery. Now, you can say that there were free markets and slavery which existed separately but at at the same time, and that's historically accurate, but to say that slavery is capitalistic is the product of either ignorance or dishonesty.

@AlexanderKingsbury You are definitely the one who is in deep confusion. You're confusing capitalism with free market and these are not the same things, even if capitalism fares better under a free market. Capitalism is just a type of economy based on the possession of the means of production and the capacity to get the human ressources necessary to run the production. Whether they are free or not doesn't matter. Slaves allow just for much cheaper labor costs than employees.

@ariane

I never aid capitalism and free markets are the same thing, nor anything of the sort. Capitalism demands free markets, but that is not a complete description of it.

@AlexanderKingsbury Free market doesn't mean everyone is free. It simply means that those participating in the market are doing it freely. But since the beginning of #capitalism in the 15th century, whole swaths of the populations in capitalistic societies weren't free and not allowed to participate in this "market". Slaves, considered as mere living sub-human objects, were lumped together with the rest of the capitalistic means of production and considered way cheaper than hired people.

@ariane

>It simply means that those participating in the market are doing it freely.

Partially, yes, and this shows why capitalism, which demands free markets, by its very nature forbids slavery. A slave, by definition, is not working voluntarily.

@AlexanderKingsbury So, according to your definition, the US weren't a capitalistic economy before it granted women and people of color equal rights and freedoms, that is, around the 1970's? And neither were most European countries and their colonies? What part of the world was capitalist then?

@ariane

Of course, jumping to that question from a discussion of slavery is a complete non sequitur; women in the US were not slaves in the 1970s, nor were people of color, with the exception of slavery that's permitted under the thirteenth amendment (which applied to people of any race or gender, and still does).

Women were never slaves? For a long time, they literally belonged to their fathers until marriage, when they would be transmitted like a luggage to their husbands. Fathers and husbands had every right on them, including to beat them to death or to let them die through neglect and disawowment. Women had pratically no rights and they certainly had no economic rights. The only difference with slaves is that they could'nt be sold on a public market.
@AlexanderKingsbury

@ariane

"Women were never slaves?"

Not what I said. Try reading again.

@AlexanderKingsbury Oh you didn't say "never" and that changes everything? Like what? And you haven't answered my question: when has the US become a capitalist economy, since it has relied on slavery for a good part of the first 2 centuries of its history and then on near-slavery mode of exploitation, without reckoning with the fact that until the 1970's, people of color and women were legally heavily discriminated against and thus not free to partake in a "free market".

@ariane

Not only did I not say "never", I specifically referred to one nation and a historically rather short time period. It's not useful or productive to ignore what people have actually said and instead imply they have said something entirely different.

We do not rely on anything even remotely close to slavery, nor have we for quite some time.

I never said that the US ever became a capitalist economy. SOME of our markets are essentially free, but far from all.

@AlexanderKingsbury Well, unlike you, I'm not cutting history and geography into isolated bubbles. You were telling me that capitalism has nothing to do with the present political backlash against minorities and when I told you that capitalism has always gone very well hands in hands with political power, including tyranny, with slavery and colonialism as good examples, you just tried wriggle out of this tight spot by focusing on temporal and geographical spรฉcificitรฉs, in complete isolation.

@ariane

" You were telling me that capitalism has nothing to do with the present political backlash against minorities"

Again, not what I said.

And you hardly put me in a "tight spot". Your claims, again, can only be supported by either ignorance or dishonesty. Capitalism clearly prescribes free markets, which are in direct contradiction to slavery. To say that capitalism supports or even permits slavery can be said only by the ignorant or the dishonest person.

@AlexanderKingsbury Ok, I see that you definitely don't know at all what you are talking about. I see no point continuing, as you are just going in circle, refusing point blank to engage with what I say. This is a waste of time. Have a nice week-end.

@ariane

This coming from someone who cannot even read what is being written, or else who cannot parse it? Can't say I will miss your commentary. Good day.