https://youtu.be/o0MNrd96SjU


All sorts of people are controlled all sorts of ways, and it's not capitalism that does it. Indeed, capitalism clearly prescribes FREE markets, open exchange, etc. It's a powerful tool to uplift the poor.
No, the primary instrument of oppression is the government. Ask yourself this; who has more power over you, right now; Jeff Bezos, of the local chief of police? Which one can send an armed man to your home with impunity?
You're deeply confused about what capitalism is. Capitalism clearly and directly forbids such things as slavery; slavery is in obvious contradiction to the very concept of a free market. Likewise government suppression of labor; also not in accord with a free market.
Again, it's impossible for slavery to have been born from capitalism. Capitalism clearly directs free markets, which are in direct contradiction to slavery. Now, you can say that there were free markets and slavery which existed separately but at at the same time, and that's historically accurate, but to say that slavery is capitalistic is the product of either ignorance or dishonesty.
I never aid capitalism and free markets are the same thing, nor anything of the sort. Capitalism demands free markets, but that is not a complete description of it.
>It simply means that those participating in the market are doing it freely.
Partially, yes, and this shows why capitalism, which demands free markets, by its very nature forbids slavery. A slave, by definition, is not working voluntarily.
PURELY capitalist? No, of course not. We've had government interference in markets since long, LONG before the 1970s. I can't think of a single example of an entire nation that was purely capitalist in the 70s, or indeed is today. Now, plenty of individual markets lack meaningful direct government interference.
Of course, jumping to that question from a discussion of slavery is a complete non sequitur; women in the US were not slaves in the 1970s, nor were people of color, with the exception of slavery that's permitted under the thirteenth amendment (which applied to people of any race or gender, and still does).
Not only did I not say "never", I specifically referred to one nation and a historically rather short time period. It's not useful or productive to ignore what people have actually said and instead imply they have said something entirely different.
We do not rely on anything even remotely close to slavery, nor have we for quite some time.
I never said that the US ever became a capitalist economy. SOME of our markets are essentially free, but far from all.
" You were telling me that capitalism has nothing to do with the present political backlash against minorities"
Again, not what I said.
And you hardly put me in a "tight spot". Your claims, again, can only be supported by either ignorance or dishonesty. Capitalism clearly prescribes free markets, which are in direct contradiction to slavery. To say that capitalism supports or even permits slavery can be said only by the ignorant or the dishonest person.
This coming from someone who cannot even read what is being written, or else who cannot parse it? Can't say I will miss your commentary. Good day.