When you talk about people you make them important. I want to think more about who I choose to make important.

Even if you are criticizing someone, burying their bad ideas with logic and all the knives of science you're still making them and their ideas important.

You can expect me to talk about Iain M. Banks more and the questions I have about his work.

It's why it's probably is a good idea to do a critical review of Newitz and their "Terraformers" which I also have questions about.

I'm sick of criticizing people I don't like, you know. Let's argue about cool people instead.

@futurebird Ooh, OK. My starter. I think Iain M. Banks wrote slightly better books as Iain Banks, than Iain M. Banks. Controversial I know.

He wrote my favourite opening line of a book ever.

"It was the day my grandmother exploded"

@eclectech @futurebird The Wasp Factory really really got to me ... can't think of one particular scene without feeling queasy ...

@mherbert @eclectech

I think about the buried mines most of all. I think that's what it was about... something about violence and how it is transmitted to the next generations.

@eclectech @futurebird (which I think is good writing btw but I do find it very difficult to reread that book)

@mherbert @eclectech

I couldn't put it down, but I was NOT having a good time.

@futurebird @mherbert This thread is making me want to reread Banks in general (it is a long while since I have read them) but The Wasp Factory won't be the one I start on, even though it was the first of his I read as an impressionable teen.
@eclectech @futurebird my first was Use of Weapons which I think was a far tamer introduction ...
@mherbert @eclectech @futurebird
I wonder what Banks *really* felt about the Culture? They seem to be at one and the same time both his ideal society, and a warning about what you might end up doing to others in the name of your ideal society.
And do the Minds really value the lives of the humanoids they coexist with or do they merely keep them around as amusing pets?
Difficult to discuss without plot spoilers...
@kbm0 @eclectech @futurebird I think Banks is on record somewhere talking about his feelings on the Culture ... as for the Minds, given how competitive they are it totally makes sense to me that the turnover rate of humans on any one vessel would definitely be a point of comparison and keeping that low by making things aboard hospitable seems like a goal ... they do claim at one point that differences are to be celebrated and keeps a society healthy, so maybe in that light they would appreciate co-existing with humanity? but then there's the Grey Area ...

@mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

Grey Area did nothing wrong.

@futurebird @kbm0 @eclectech I would argue the same, but they ended up being ostracised anyway by being willing to go there ...
@futurebird @kbm0 @eclectech ... and in fact certain world events in our timeline could use similar treatment ... just sayin'

@futurebird @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

No? The entire model for weaker beings coexisting with stronger ones is predicated on the guarantee that the strong will not abuse that power. Once you can’t trust that a Mind will not see or manipulate your private thoughts, all trust in them goes out of the window. The Culture as a civilisation would not be possible without that trust. Grey Area would have undermined the entire basis of the civilisation if the other Minds had tolerated it.

@david_chisnall @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

But that "the culture" does tolerate it. They just won't center or endorse such actions. But, it's clear that there is awareness of what gray area is doing and no one stops them.

@futurebird @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

It is ostracised and not allowed to use its given name. That’s pretty much the harshest penalty that exists in the Culture.

@david_chisnall @futurebird @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech My favourite Ian Banks book is The player of the games. Of course i liked other books as well, but i liked the player the most.

@nickapos @futurebird @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

I have lost count of the number of times I have reread that one. My mind has gone blank, but I also seem to recall that the drone has a cameo in one of the later books.

@david_chisnall @futurebird @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech Yeah my physical copy is falling apart as well, but i also have it in digital.

@nickapos @futurebird @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

Mine is in good condition, but mostly because I read my school’s library copy a lot before buying it.

@david_chisnall @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

I think if a mind went rouge and started IDK... just destroying stuff they would stop it.

Put a slap drone on it.(slap mind?)

The gray area is bad enough to be shunned but not bad enough to be stopped. Because is giving genocidal men nightmares and violating their privacy a crime worth the effort of preventing? When you have other things to do with your time?

@futurebird @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech

It’s doing those things outside of the Culture. If it tried anywhere near another Mind, they would be able to stop it. If another civilisation decided they disapproved and destroyed the ship, I doubt the Culture would raise more than a token protest.

One of the later books refers to the fact it was called Meatfucker as the worst level of penalty someone in The Culture can imagine. In a society that exists to provide everyone with a framework for self actualisation, being denied the right to choose your own identity is a huge penalty.

Sleeper Service had the ship equivalent of a slap drone (an escort ship that keeps an eye on it). Greg Area was probably not seen as enough of a threat to warrant it (it’s a small ship, most Orbitals or Rocks would not be threatened by it).

@futurebird @david_chisnall @mherbert @kbm0 @eclectech Most of the Culture books revolve around things that the Culture thoroughly disapproves of yet puts a great deal of effort into enabling.

@teamonkey @futurebird @david_chisnall @kbm0 @eclectech

"Special Circumstances" ... maybe that was Banks' point - there are always edge cases somewhere and your ideals can never be 100% effective?

@mherbert @eclectech @futurebird

As long as you noticed the chapter names the first time. I was deeply confused the first time I read that book because I didn’t realise that it started in the middle and went forwards and backwards in time in alternating chapters (made slightly more confusing by one of the chapters being a near-death experience where he has a flashback to even earlier).

I took it on a trip where I had a lot more time than I expected, so probably read it seven or eight times as a teenager. I’ve reread it a few times as an adult, but a few of the later books knocked it down my list of favourite Culture novels.

@david_chisnall @eclectech @futurebird interesting ... the story is definitely disjoint but I had not twigged that it was explicitly laid out like that ... can see it now you point it out though ...

@mherbert @eclectech @futurebird

The clue is the chapter numbers. The forwards timeline has Arabic numbers that count up, the backwards timeline has Roman numerals that count down. Once you notice this, it makes sense. I tried once reading it in chronological order but it’s less good: the backwards bits of the story have revelations that explain things in the forward timeline and are introduced at the important point in the narrative.

@david_chisnall @eclectech @futurebird huh ... will bump that up the to-reread pile ...

@eclectech @futurebird @mherbert

My English teacher introduced me to The State of the Art. I read the other early Culture novels before trying some of the without-the-M ones. I think Whit is the only one I enjoyed enough to reread. They were mostly good in the ‘I understand and admire the technical skill required to write this’ sense and not in the ‘I enjoy this’ sense.

@futurebird @eclectech definitely a bruising read ... still thinking about it though, so pretty effective ...
@mherbert that was my first sans-M, and it scarred me. Took a few years before I tried another.