| Good, it is necessary for our safety and security | |
| OK, I trust Google to prioritize user interests | |
| Bad, it is an attempt to take complete control | |
| Terrible, this is the end of software freedom |
| Good, it is necessary for our safety and security | |
| OK, I trust Google to prioritize user interests | |
| Bad, it is an attempt to take complete control | |
| Terrible, this is the end of software freedom |
It is bad but it is not the end unless we decide to not fight.
That is part of it, but fighting is also about creating social pushback. When weβre loud, bring attention to these changes, and refuse to accept them as the new normal, we change the math for them. Google needs to know that locking down Android is a PR disaster that drives their loyal users and developers away.
@keepandroidopen Missing "Good, it may propel interest in real open devices".
EDIT: Thanks for the boosts! Obviously Android should remain open -- but I think we should also try to break free from Google entirely with projects like @postmarketOS
I'm thinking about trying to blog/make videos about #Linuxphones -- follow me and my blog (linked from profile) and add a like if you have interest (trying to keep the spam low here, folks)!
The question isn't right. Android is going to be there bigger and better AND blended with a lot of what is in ChromeOS today. They needed to be blended to the betterment of both of them.
@anne_twain @keepandroidopen See https://keepandroidopen.org/
Google announced that as of September 2026*, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google* five months from now@keepandroidopen Google has finally rolled out a βsolutionβ for downloading APK files outside of Google, which, in my opinion, is absolute garbage.π
I never felt the desire to sideload an app, so why should I care either way?
It's about installing apps.
Sideloading is a propaganda term.
I use #Android without a #Google account. Almost all my apps are being installed using the F-Droid repository.
Why should i create a contract with this weird US company, give them a lot of personal data and let them decide, what i'm allowed to install and use?
I don't want to be a digital slave.
Think about digital sovereignty.
@keepandroidopen I feel that at best, it is an attempt to solve a "people problem" with a software fix. I have worked in IT support long enough to know that that never works. It only compounds the problem by creating even more new ones (while not actually solving the original problem).
The illusion of security will be quickly shattered as soon as scammers figure out how to work around it anyway.
Other:
No problem, I'll move to /e/os, bye bye Google
Whoever voted "Good, it's necessary for our safety and security.", should have their drivers license taken away. For safety and security. Stupid is as stupid does.
@keepandroidopen maybe it will finally focus peoples minds on directing adequate resorces to refining (to consumer ready level) a linux mobile os. And focus the minds of lawmakers to break the duopoly by legislating that apps must be available to download and run outside the US duopoly (banking and id apps).
I was hoping a tech conglomerate would emerge to fork android and maintain a free version, but that's unrealistic. I think Android is a gonner at this point.
Not "terrible" because we need a push to have googleless devices. Other than this, yes, it is really bad.
@keepandroidopen I'm a contractor at Google, currently (reluctantly) writing documentation to support the verification rollout. Was full time with Android before the mass layoffs started.
I stopped trusting Android to be better than iPhones when they stopped selling Pixel phones with headphone jacks.
I stopped trusting Google to care about its users when they added genAI to their codebase.
And I still have to get up and go to work and pretend I'm happy to be there.
@keepandroidopen honestly I feel like the harbinger at this point. I was also required to document Manifest v3, which killed adblockers on Chrome.
I really hope y'all can at least pressure them to provide a real opt-out process, because it's hard for me to imagine them walking this back entirely. There's folks in there who really believe it'll be good for protecting users with no downside.
@keepandroidopen Well, from what Ive saw on SOG at least the Advanced Workflow or whatever name is decent enough after we pushed.
I dont think google would do anything like that without pressure. Now we have to keep pressure to make sure they keep their promisse.