And they respond like I'm the one being unreasonable
@TheSwiv This is a screenshot of a Twitter post by a user named "democracy diva" with the handle "[@]democracydiva". The post includes a circular profile picture on the left showing a person with dark hair and glasses. The tweet text reads verbatim: "Mark Zuckerberg created a website to rank his female classmates by their appearance and it ended up destroying democracy, in case you're wondering about the consequences of toxic masculinity". To the right of the username, there is a down arrow icon. The background is white with black text for the content.
Provided by @altbot, generated privately and locally using Qwen3-Vl:8b
🌱 Energy used: 0.134 Wh
@TheSwiv how do you read "a private company, through decades of anti-anti-trust, and through the need for surveillance capitalism for its ad market, has so much power it can topple democracies and aid in genocide" and you attribute it to "toxic masculinity". Girlboss darling Sheryl-fucking-Sandberg is the architect of the advertising model that caused most of this ffs
EDIT: OP this isn't directed at you, but at the person in the screenshot
Well, the number of eprson that enjoyed its platforms with no-question is an important part of the issue. Making the world conscious of that link is both necessary and sufficient (despite it alone is just putting a weight of responsibility that seems unbarable to many, other actions matters a lot)
Patriarchy was always going to end up sacrificing its own children.
@Theotime812 @TheSwiv
Having a Meta account?
Supporting the fascists just by taking part?
Wondering how much personal data they’re getting from you just by having the app installed?
Worrying about having your amount compromised in the WhatsApp equivalent of SIM-jacking?
And finally… it’s a solution looking for a problem. 2FA apps already exist and don’t require a phone number or WhatsApp account or any other random things, they Just Work.