Electrify everything.
Ban the production of gasoline-powered vehicles.
Tax oil companies dry.
Subsidize all renewables and EVs.
@petergleick I don't understand why more governments around the world don't see "our entire economy revolves around an expensive quantity in limited supply, primarily found in one of the most war-torn and politically unstable regions in the planet" as a serious national security risk.
Like, forget all of the environmental concerns, if your country were utterly dependent on corn or steel or any other commodity only found in a region that was constantly at war causing random price spikes, you'd think you'd be making removal of that dependency a nationwide priority.
@Ilka4You @azonenberg @petergleick
If you have a global supply chain to produce solar and wind.
The presumption is swapping out the energy source for the planet killing global economy, to make the CO2 go away and that will save us when the problem is a planet killing global economy.
It will never ever live within planetary boundaries because it’s structured on being outside of them. The cheapest and healthiest and most prosperous pathway is to re-localize economies.
@MisuseCase agreed, it would be. Science is tirelessly working on this. Politics cut fundings as they please to continue the cash flow to their pockets.
@MisuseCase I recognize this is over simplyfied - in a post that is limited to 500 signs you kinda have to rely on ppls common sense and ability to use it.
Weigh up the pro & contra - you might be suprised how beneficial sustainability is. I am stating renewable energy can be unrelated to political dependancies, I DID NOT say it is for free.