Hypothetical question: if Apple released a Mac with the same form factor, display, and price as the 13” iPad Pro, how much impact do you think that would have on iPad Pro sales?

Assume they have done a good job implementing touch on the Mac.

No impact
16.4%
Mild impact
38.8%
Large impact
44.8%
Poll ended at .
Follow up: how much impact on iPad Pro sales would there be if the iPad Air had ProMotion? Everything else is exactly the same as it is today.
No impact
37.7%
Mild impact
37.7%
Large impact
24.6%
Poll ended at .
Final question: if you are an iPad Pro owner (like me), what do you personally think the main driver for you to spend 2x as much as the Air?
@matt_birchler Display, Face ID
@stephenrobles basically the same for me. I can live with Touch ID if I need to, but that display is tough compared to basically everything else Apple makes these days.
@matt_birchler the promotion makes a considerable difference for me editing podcasts. And I do Enjoy sitting outside building shortcuts so the bank texture and brightness is nice too
@matt_birchler oled display for media apps
@matt_birchler at this point, it is just that 120hz OLED.

@matt_birchler faceID + mLED + 13" version is what pulled me to the m1 model. The air now has a 13" model, and the pro has moved to an OLED (I'm not a fan) so I'd probably cut my losses around faceid and drop down if I needed a new one.

I find 60hz on the normal screen looks less offensive than 60hz on the 120hz screen. I don't understand why, but it's been true ever since they shipped the high refresh rate

@matt_birchler FaceID was my main motivator for staying with the Pro line. 120hz refresh rate was a close second.

I currently have an M2 11”, which I traded a 2018 11” for 18 months ago. I could go to the Air but FaceID is really where I’d feel the downgrade.

@matt_birchler the display. There's hoping for a WWDC that allows m4 iPad pro or newer owners boot into Mac OS.
@matt_birchler
- FaceID
- OLED
- 12GB RAM (not sure how much RAM the newest Air has)
- thinner
- so overpowered I can use it for a long time
@matt_birchler Hope that iPadOS windowing would finally make it more usable for me as a laptop replacement (it didn’t)… and Face ID.
@matt_birchler I'll probably move to the Air next time I upgrade. Same evolution for me as when I moved from MacBook Pro to MacBook Air. As the work I did changed along with the capability of the software I needed improved and became more efficient, I no longer needed all the MacBook Pro bells and whistles. I moved to the MacBook Air and it has more than filled the bill. /1
@matt_birchler Sure, as specs stand I'd miss the iPad Pro Display, but if that product line continues its evolution I can imagine higher prices that would make the tradeoff much the same. Bottom line is I'll probably move to an iPad Air whenever I upgrade next. /end
@matt_birchler Performance, ProMotion, FaceID.
And I’m probably lying about the performance side 😂
@matt_birchler Face ID, with the tandem OLED being a distant second.
@matt_birchler Display and FaceID.
It’s an M1 model and have no plans to upgrade.
@matt_birchler Main reasons I still do Pro: weight and Face ID.
@matt_birchler Nanotexture OLED, but also ProMotion, FaceID, and best CPU available
@NateBarham Yeah the display resonates with me too. Could you do everything alrught on an M4 in the Air if you needed to?
@matt_birchler Well sure, since my Pro is an M4 already. 😄
@matt_birchler Latest performance, OLED, RAM, speakers, Face ID, thunderbolt.
@matt_birchler FaceID and tandem OLED display. Thinness, ram, sheer power to last me a good few years.
@matt_birchler If Face ID was on the air maybe I’d think about it
@matt_birchler Display and better Magic Keyboard.
@matt_birchler NANO TEXTURE!!! Also super thin design and OLED is amazing
@matt_birchler 120Hz, OLED Display, Face ID and I just love how thin it is

@matt_birchler FaceID, much nicer display, better Magic Keyboard.

I genuinely couldn’t care less about the “power” of it. My 2018 iPad Pro was still doing everything I needed when I replaced it last year with an M4.

@matt_birchler OLED, ProMotion, FaceID, and better speakers
@matt_birchler for my use case, Face ID. Everything else was nice to have.
@matt_birchler My iPad used to be where I spent most of my time. Average of 2+ hours a day. So I wanted the big, fancy one. Having gotten back to having a MacBook Pro middle of last year I’m honestly thinking of getting rid of the iPad. It does some things better than a MacBook but I hardly use it now. If a MacBook had touch and access to iPad apps I expect many wouldn’t want both.

@matt_birchler The display was the only reason. For good and bad, it’s my main TV.

The performance of a base iPad would be totally fine to browse Safari and stream videos. FaceID is nice, but would no way justify the premium.

@matt_birchler The only compelling feature that the iPad Pro has over the Air for me is FaceID. The rest of the specs in the Pro are a waste of money as long as that device only runs iPadOS.

I still use an iPad mini from time to time, but I have no real use for an iPad given the OS limitations. I’m planning to trade in my iPad Pro 2018 for a MacBook Neo. The primary use for my iPads these days seems to be gathering dust.

In Australia, the iPad Pro 11” costs $700 more than the iPad Air.

@matt_birchler I feel like it would depend heavily on the app ecosystem. Yes Macs can run iPad apps, but not all app developers let that happen.
@matt_birchler That's a big and kinda ill-defined assumption (what counts as good job here?).

@matt_birchler The trouble with this sort of question is defining what exactly the differences are between the OSs after ‘touch optimisation’, and let’s say pencil too.

Install apps from anywhere? Compiler support? Of course, I’d love it!

The app ecosystem? Devs criminally underutilise the power of iPadOS, with the background tasks API and granular filesystem permissions.

I prefer iPadOS’s app lifecycle and I’d be dragged kicking and screaming back to manually quitting apps.