in case you ever wondered why bluesky breaks all the fuckin time and is increasingly a pile of jank
in case you ever wondered why bluesky breaks all the fuckin time and is increasingly a pile of jank
@davidgerard yeah, just a tool which makes you dependent on a cloud provider burning investors' money running inference for unprofitable price
Maybe not all tools are good
@davidgerard fun fact: offering services/products with negative profit to increase market share is long-known, very unfair, and, in some states, illegal business strategy
@davidgerard And they still don't have the ability to send photos in DMs. Now I know why. 🤦
JFC, why is everything shit..
@davidgerard I did the "block claude" thing on GitHub that someone posted here and it is a bit disheartening how so many good projects (not bsky) have the pop up
fair to assume about everything is/will be fucked at this rate
@davidgerard I think we're finding out in real time just how much tech companies have been successful creating software despite the "ship it at all costs" attitude towards development because of software devs being embarrassed by bad code.
Can't wait for all of the security problems being injected into these systems by coding systems trained on literally billions of lines of code from github written by college freshmen learning how to code.
@davidgerard All the resource waste aside, the people most likely to run to vibe-coding it all are also the ones who neglect their testing, documentation, specs, etc. when hand-coding stuff.
They fail even at the level of "trust, but verify" because they're not verifying.
@gooba42 @davidgerard And if you *start off* going "no, it's okay that I used LLMs, because I do testing, documentation, and specs"?
You are now using a machine that is basically training you to stop doing that stuff. You've already surrendered "oh, I don't need to do that, the random number generator can take care of it" on one thing. Why not on a second thing? Why not on everything?
@delta_vee @gooba42 @davidgerard On the other hand, I *have* heard tell of people who claimed to write the code themselves but get the robot to write the tests
which is
disturbing, to me, because to me the tests are the spec. so basically you're deliberately introducing noise into your program's specification