Oh wow, photos of the damage from the M7.0 earthquake in Alaska (originally Yukon Geological Survey on FB, via Dan Shugar). #earthquake #Alaska #landslide
Sentinel-1 before/after (in 3D) of that last one... Which I pulled off Copernicus a second ago. Wow! #MountKingGeorge #MtKingGeorge #geology #landslide #earthquake #RemoteImaging
This could be a synthetic aperture radar artifact, but at the base of that landslide is a strange topology anomaly. πŸ€”
Hmm, what funky object is radar reflective in a weird way on an ice sheet? Ice itself? Ground down granite? So many odds things out there, LOL.
Oooh, the second one, the strange ring, is this. I wonder if that's volcanic? There appears to be a lot of dust stuck to the walls of the snow around that structure, which is causing those reflections. 🀷 #mystery #geology

This one looks like there's a door in it πŸ€ͺ

Secret villain lair?

Spaceship?

(probably the top of a buried mountain πŸ˜‰ )

For the record, 60.4893, -139.9348

#mystery

Oooh, it's VERY radar reflective. Whatever it is. Super secret Canadian military base encased in a glacier? πŸ€ͺ
DEM layer is completely whacko at that location. 🀨 #gis

@ai6yr We find stuff like this a lot out in BF Nowhere and some of it is specific to the use of SAR and they use them to monitor movement etc

Integration of Corner Reflectors for the Monitoring of Mountain Glacier Areas with Sentinel-1 Time Series
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/8/988

@cvvhrn Oooh, corner reflector on a glacier to monitor movement... that *WOULD* explain that strange signature!
@ai6yr You also get weird stuff like this and its almost always in the boundaries of of a military or restricted area (Edwards) which are calibration marks for satellite and airborne optical systems
Bevor Sie zu Google Maps weitergehen

@cvvhrn @ai6yr Amusingly, the calibration targets for optical measuring systems look exactly like that, just on a glass slide with the largest square only 10mm across.
@attoparsec @cvvhrn @ai6yr indeed they are both called β€œUSAF target” regardless of scale!
@ai6yr very rough rocks can be highly radar reflective. That's what all the "bright areas" on early radar maps of Venus turned out to be. It's just a very difficult place to lose a cow.

@llewelly

My first guess would have been coherent backscatter from multiple reflections within a pit.

Polarization maps would help resolve that, if @ai6yr has them.

@michael_w_busch @ai6yr well, your guess is probably better than mine.

@llewelly @ai6yr

In the case of Venus, some of the radar bright regions are metallic frost that condenses out on the tops of mountains.

Fortunately, we do not have to deal with that possibility around here.

@michael_w_busch @llewelly Looks like the flaws are from the Copernicus DEM layer, which apparently has a problem acquisition on glaciers. From visual inspection, it looks like pits/crevasses which have material deposition on top of the ice (from the mountains... I assume eroded rocks of some sort), which must be causing that backscatter on those particular satellites they used. Must be particularly reflective material that is in those pits.
@michael_w_busch @llewelly Radar reflective crevasse? LOL.
@michael_w_busch @llewelly No idea what these are, but that glacier has a lot of these on the surface... looks like pits of some sort. Probably end up as unintentional radar reflectors!

@ai6yr @llewelly

It does not require particularly reflective material to get coherent backscatter, just two signal paths that have the same path length (e.g. double bounces where swapping the inbound and outbound gives the same length).

Ice and snowpack are infamous for this happening.

Because the backscatter is coherent, it is also a great way to mess up phase and get glitches in SAR elevation maps.

Polarization maps can resolve it by separating even-order scattering from odd-order.

@michael_w_busch @llewelly Oooh, interesting, didn't know it just requires the same path length! I did figure it was some kind of SAR artifact πŸ€ͺ

@ai6yr @llewelly

On this I recommend Elachi & van Zyl's "Introduction to the Physics and Techniques of Remote Sensing", which Jakob van Zyl taught me from in grad school.

(Both authors were experts on SAR, so the book covers it extensively as compared to other remote sensing techniques.)

@michael_w_busch @llewelly Thanks! I teach undergrads how to use the tools and the principles of remote sensing, but we don't get into the physics and math (only the application), and I have come in to this in a roundabout manner (ie using the tools for practical reasons, vs. the theoretical/academic route), so this is all appreciated!
@ai6yr Stay away from my house!
@ai6yr maybe the CIA lost a radioactive source there, too...
2001: A Space Odyssey, black monolith

YouTube

@cvvhrn 2001 is really violent to wake up to if you start watching it late and pass out at the beginning. Set at a reasonable speaking volume...BAM!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAoooooAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAooooAAAAAOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAOAOAOOAOOAOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

@ai6yr

That looks like Devil's Tower.

I think I hear weird music....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkykqyMEarA

Close Encounters of the Third Kind: Communicating with music

YouTube
@ai6yr Watching the Earth remodel itself is stunning. Thinking how long it took to get the continents where they are. Earth quakes moving stuff, volcanoes spewing lava adding more soil.