Random Fermi Paradox solution of the day:

Nobody goes into space and colonizes the galaxy because only Moon Nazis want to do that, and after experiencing a few dozen genocides all sapient species learn the safest thing to do when you see a Moon Nazi is to murder them immediately, it's the only way to avoid the genocides.

@cstross Okay - what about a group that takes as given that neither they nor their descendants will be alive aim to establish a foundation/group/club/whatever that can wants to *eventually* build an ark to reach Proxima Centauri at it's closest approach in about 26,000 years.

The ideals, goals, ambition, institutional methods established by the "tree planting" generations just pitching designs and funding research, etc.

Presumably non-nazis.

Basically Long Now foundation + Centauri Dreams.

@stevenaleach You're describing a goal we only have—at best—two social structures capable of achieving: a religion, or a royal family. Both of these have undesirable failure modes. (Most human social structures disintegrate or lose track of their purpose over roughly the same duration as a human life expectancy.)
@cstross Yes! And I doubt it could be solved but it's fun to think about. Say a group wants to build a plasma sail vessel -- solar wind speed, so over 4k years to A.C now, shorter leaving at some point closer to A.C's closest approach. For slow enough of a ship, there's some ideal departure date many thousands of years from now to minimize the trip time. And that's an epoch cool timescale to think about that puts the epoch scale of getting to the nearest star into perspective.

@cstross And it turns the story into two engineering problems, both epoch: engineering multi-thousand year institutions based on an idea and that institution having the goal of building some mega-structure that has to be self-contained and survive a similar timescale and support a bottle civilization over a similar number of generations rivaling the time since the dawn of agriculture for both phases.

See - "moon nazis" wouldn't be into any of that or contribute thinking to it. Maybe.. ?

@stevenaleach @cstross
But nobody can express a practical and realistic reason why we should try to get to Proxima Centauri. Any motivation to try to do it is profoundly irrational, so although you might initially avoid actual Moon nazis, you still have to put enormous resources in the hands of people you *can't trust* to act in the interests of humanity, and hold it together for 1000s of years without Moon nazis or The Lunar Inquisition taking over at any future point.

@stevenaleach @cstross
More importantly, if your civilization could engineer that feat of scope, energy transmission, and containment, why would anyone even get off the ship at the destination?

Or more importantly, why leave your solar system, or world at all if you have that kind of containment.

@cstross @stevenaleach true for humans. insects, maybe?

@cstross
that's not quite true. It's true of literate societies.

Whether an illiterate society can go to the stars is left as an exercise to the reader ;)
@stevenaleach

@cstross @stevenaleach
Universities hang around. Building a department which can sustain an area of study through many generations of graduate students, PhDs and professorships wouldn't be trivial.

#Anathem doesn't seem ridiculous on that.

The Long Range Foundation is even better named for this than the Long Now, albeit the latter is real.

@Photo55 @cstross @stevenaleach Even if we count from the Great Schism, the Papacy is a longer-lasting institution than any university, I think?

The Nine Houses made it to ten thousand years but it probably helps if God's still around and can send you a note if you're doing it wrong. :-)

@denisbloodnok

Well, currently the Curia etc is an example of religious nature*, but perhaps not quite so continuous as people regard it, nor so devoted to a single aim, other than power, as might be needed to move anything between stars.

But yes, an old institution.

* I.E. one of the two structural approaches given above as persisting for long periods.
Vid Sup.

@Photo55 Mmm, I'm just trying to think of anything older (and at least arguably seeking a similar goal to when it started).

@cstross @stevenaleach

One could argue that fandom represents a third. (Of course, that just means we'll be stuck because we won't be able to agree on what to name the starship -- 'Enterprise', 'Millenium Falcon', 'Liberator' ...)

@skjeggtroll @cstross Aren't religions just a specific type of fandom?

https://xkcd.com/3123/

Canon

xkcd

@stevenaleach @cstross

The presumption that ones successors will be non-nazis has empirically / historically not fared well despite countless sincere attempts.

@cstross Then again, I don't think humans could ever colonize - but I'm horrified by the idea of *what if* there is no other life out there? What if we are "it"? Our sun's gone in a few billion years.

I'm horrified by the idea that there could be trillions of years to the heat death of the universe and nothing to see it or experience it at all.

So if we could get some microbes on probes to nearby red-dwarfs to infest any sterile warm wet rock, then all of human history was worth it.

@stevenaleach @cstross I understand your feeling of horror, but as a counterpoint ... all things may come to an end. Whether it's the heat death of the universe, or a supervolcano erruption that takes place tomorrow ... our time is limited. That makes our time precious, and I feel like we can embrace that rather than despairing in the finiteness of it all.
@stevenaleach @cstross Our sun may last billions of years but multicellular life on Earth only has about 100-300 millions years left.
With regard to your concern about whether there is even microbial life other places in the galaxy I have to say yes. We have evidence of life on Earth 3.8 billion years ago. It showed up as soon as it could. I bet there was life on Mars and Venus too. Earth is just much more stable. Life has existed on Earth for ~28% of the existence of the universe.
@drgroftehauge Out of curiosity: where does the 100-300 million years number come from?
@steinarb Sun gets too hot in about 300 million years. But I'm also pretty sure that slow carbon cycle is moving more carbon into the geosphere than out - however with human intervention the time horizon on that one is obviously uncertain.

300 million years is not the number I have heard for the sun becoming too hot for life (multicellular or otherwise).

Around the 1.5 billion years is the number I've heard (and also the number a few web searches gives me).

@cstross there is actually a sort of joke about this in the original Dyson Sphere paper.

The whole paper is tongue-in-cheek, a satire of the notion that we could find aliens by observing for radio frequencies (Dyson is making the argument that we know so little about potential alien intelligence that we might as well take all of that processing power and scan the infrared frequencies instead looking for invisible spheres around stars).

Why spheres around stars? Because clearly the only cultures to develop the technology to become space-faring would be their species version of the Nazis and would be compelled with a desire to maximize land for their progeny.

@mark @cstross The "problem" with Dyson's paper is that he tried to ridicule a perfectly reasonable scientific theory with a supposedly ridiculous scientific theory that ended up being also a perfectly reasonable scientific theory.

Both of these theories would be used for perfectly reasonable scientific experiments, which remain ongoing.

Sometimes this is how things go with science. The "big bang" theory was named by someone ridiculing the theory. Oops?

@isaackuo @cstross The problem is that both theories are equally likely.

... Dyson was trying to make the larger point of "... and that likelihood is so low we should stop wasting time on this" but the astronomy community responded with "But what if instead we consider both options?"

Honestly, it's one of my favorite self-owns in astronomy history. 😉

If memory serves, there's also a story about Einstein thinking black holes were unlikely because he'd made some solid progress on relativity with the thought-tool of "If this were possible, wouldn't we have seen it already?" Since nobody had noticed holes in space yet, he originally discounted gravitational singularities as a neat quirk of the math that was unlikely to be real.

... I think he lived long enough to bear witness to their discovery and changed his mind in light of new evidence.

(I think Dyson may also have discounted the secondary effect / "scientific head-fake": even if finding aliens is improbable, staring really hard at radio signals or infrared sources could lead to finding other cool stuff, so it's still worth doing. If the way we get there is "get folks hyped enough about ET to throw money at us," whatever works!)

@mark @isaackuo Wrt. black holes, that's a nope: Cygnus X-1 was detected in 1972, and Einstein died in 1955.
@cstross Is that an invitation to watch Iron Sky?
@cstross galactic melanoma prevention

@cstross

Oddly enough, this is what 'primitive' tribes used to do: kill the sociopaths. We promote them to the highest positions of power.

"Random Fermi Paradox solution of the day:

"Nobody goes into space and colonizes the galaxy because only Moon Nazis want to do that, and after experiencing a few dozen genocides all sapient species learn the safest thing to do when you see a Moon Nazi is to murder them immediately, it's the only way to avoid the genocides."

#narcissism #pathocracy

@cstross Nuke them out of orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
@cstross Not killing Moon Nazis immediately is how you get Daleks.

@JamesPadraicR @cstross

This should explain things

@Wgere @cstross @JamesPadraicR The one arm is for pushing things off tables.

@Wgere @JamesPadraicR @cstross

Blofeld in a Dalek? RUN AWAY!!!

@Wgere @JamesPadraicR @cstross explaaaiiin! explaaaaiiiin!! explaaaiiiin!!!

@Wgere We've got mouse in the house, and they seem to be experts in fishing out cheese from traps without triggering them.

Could do with a little Exterminate! Exterminate!...

@Wgere @cstross
ALL RODENT-KIND SHALL BOW DOWN BEFORE THE MIGHT OF THE FELEKS OR BE DESTROYED!!!
THE FOOD APES SHALL REMAIN TO SERVICE THE FELEKS!!!
@cstross
Works for Mars Nazis, also, too, Charlie, if you know what I mean.

@cstross

This is how I learn that not only did someone make a movie about Nazis living on the moon, they even made a sequel.

#FermiParadox #Luna

@cstross Or a Moon Commonist.

@cstross
Nobody goes into space and colonises their galaxy because it's an insane, incoherent goal with no possible return on the investment of energy and resources. Only civilisations infected by the Infinite Growth mind-virus pursue such goals, and their home planets … don't make it.

I sure hope our civilisation isn't throwing irrecoverable resources into a project that can definitely never pay for itself just to make the number go up for as long as possible.

@petealexharris @cstross I think it is line go up as fast as possible for the goal. No interest in how long the line continues to go up.

@petealexharris @cstross I think that "colonizing" the galaxy is a reasonable goal, but the "problem" is that the rational way to go about it would take a lot longer than the age of the universe so far.

For the most part, interstellar probes can provide desired scientific exploration info about far away star systems, and these will not be very noticeable for us.

Space colonization makes most sense within a star system, with expansion to other star systems only making sense during close flybys.

@petealexharris @cstross So here's the thing. Star system flybys are not very common. As such, it's just plain going to take a really long time to expand throughout the whole galaxy.

So "the" solution to the Fermi paradox might simply be that the galaxy is young compared to how long it would plausibly take for our solar system to be colonized by another civilization.

@isaackuo @cstross
I think it isn't a reasonable goal at all, and suspect the idea gets way too much unwarranted, unexamined acceptance because we're embedded in a culture with a distorted view of the same-planet colonisations our ancestors hailed as successes. But it's not the same thing; there are no precedents at all for it. It's a plan to burn vast resources irrevocably and bring back nothing to replace their lost value.

@petealexharris @cstross We do lots of things that consume vast resources that bring nothing of value. I think it's a quintessential mistake to demand that human activity produce something "of value".

For example, a lot of people enjoy going on vacations to see ... I dunno penguins or Paris or something. Doesn't do a lick of good toward producing something "of value". So what? That shouldn't be the purpose of a human life.

@isaackuo @petealexharris Cost accounting is a disease. As a value system it's meaningless unless it can ascribe value to a haiku or a smile. There are other values than money.
@cstross @isaackuo @petealexharris
Money is a decentralised rationing system for societies to deal with scarcity of resources.