The first #Starhopper flight was in πŸ“† 2019. First #Starship landing (without #RUD πŸ’₯) πŸ“† 2021. First #atmospheric entry πŸ“† 2024. When do you expect the first (uncrewed) Starship #Mars πŸ”΄ landing attempt ? πŸ€”
2025
1%
2027
25.3%
2029
24.2%
> 2030
49.5%
Poll ended at .
#SpaceX will launch its first #Starships πŸš€ to #Mars πŸ”΄ in two years. "These will be uncrewed to test the reliability of landing intact on Mars" https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/musk-says-spacex-launch-first-uncrewed-starships-mars-two-years-2024-09-07/

If the uncrewed test missions succeed, #crewed πŸ‘¨β€πŸš€ πŸ‘©β€πŸš€ missions are expected in πŸ“† 2028 https://www.cnet.com/science/space/spacex-plans-5-missions-to-mars-by-2026-elon-musk-says/

#SpaceX #Starship #Mars

SpaceX Plans 5 Missions to Mars by 2026, Elon Musk Says

If the uncrewed test missions succeed, crewed missions are expected in 2028.

CNET

"#Mars πŸ”΄ serves as a simplified laboratory for testing #climate models and scenarios, without oceans and biology, that we can then use to better understand πŸ€”πŸ’­ Earth systems." #Mars can tilt more than Earth, causing the Red Planet's poles to receive more direct sunlight than its midlatitudes, making for longer summer days with higher temperatures https://www.space.com/33001-mars-ice-age-ending-now.html

#ClimateChange

Red Planet Heats Up: Ice Age Ending on Mars

Mars is emerging from an ice age, a finding that could shed light on the past and future climates of both Mars and Earth, researchers say.

Space
Injecting tiny particles into #Mars’s atmosphere could warm 🌑️ the planet by more than 10Β°C in a matter of months, researchers find - enough to sustain liquid water πŸ’§. The 2 million tons of particles represent roughly 0.1% of the industrial metals mined βš’οΈ on Earth each year. #Terraforming research shows how important it is to study Earth. β€œCan we understand πŸ€”πŸ’­ #climate and ecosystems well enough to build them elsewhere ?” https://www.science.org/content/article/terraforming-mars-could-be-easier-scientists-thought
β€œThe barrier to warming #Mars πŸ”΄ to allow liquid water πŸ’§ is not as high as previously thought” : Changing the shape of the planet’s #dust https://news.weinberg.northwestern.edu/2024/08/26/how-we-could-warm-mars/
How we could warm Mars – Weinberg College News

#ESA #Hubble #SpaceTelescope πŸ”­ images of #Mars taken December 2024. Thin #water-ice ❄️ clouds are apparent in ultraviolet light https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2025/04/Mars_December_2024
Mars (December 2024)

Mars (December 2024)

Why human πŸ§‘β€πŸš€ missions to #Mars πŸ”΄ (8:30) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzhSmnGcSkE

Dr. Levine spent 41 years at #NASA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_S._Levine

#HumanSpaceflight #SpaceTravel

The Exploration and Colonization of Mars: Why Mars? Why Humans? | Dr. Joel Levine | TEDxRVA

YouTube
#Starship's total on orbit mass adds to 1510.5 MT, of which 1200 MT are propellant β›½ and 100 MT payload and the 12 person crew πŸ‘©β€πŸš€ and their consumables 🍝 for a time of flight of 180 d. According to #SpaceX, their target times of flight between Earth and #Mars are 140 d in 2029, 90 d in 2033 and 80 d in 2035 ⏱️ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54012-0
About feasibility of SpaceX's human exploration Mars mission scenario with Starship - Scientific Reports

After decades where human spaceflight missions have been reserved to low Earth orbit, recent years have seen mission proposals and even implemented plans, e.g. with the mission Artemis I, for returning to the lunar surface. SpaceX has published over various media (e.g., its official website, conference presentations, user manual) conceptual information for its reusable Starship to enable human exploration missions to the Martian surface by the end of the decade. The technological and human challenges associated with these plans are daunting. Such a mission at that distance would require excellent system reliability and in-situ-resource utilization on a grand scale, e.g. to produce propellant. The plans contain little details however and have not yet been reviewed concerning their feasibility. In this paper we show significant technological gaps in these plans. Based on estimates and extrapolated data, a mass model as needed to fulfill SpaceX’s plans could not be reproduced and the subsequent trajectory optimization showed that the current plans do not yield a return flight opportunity, due to a too large system mass. Furthermore, significant gaps exist in relevant technologies, e.g. power supply for the Martian surface. It is unlikely that these gaps can be closed until the end of the decade. We recommend several remedies, e.g. stronger international participation to distribute technology development and thus improve feasibility. Overall, with the limited information published by SpaceX about its system and mission scenario and extrapolation from us to fill information gaps, we were not able to find a feasible Mars mission scenario using Starship, even when assuming optimal conditions such as 100% recovery rate of crew consumables during flight.

Nature

Both companies’ plans rely on the availability of an orbital propellant β›½ depot, which would fuel up their vehicles on the way to the #moon πŸŒ™. The biggest test will be the orbital propellant transfer demonstration https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/spacex-blue-origin-share-new-lunar-landing-profiles/

A single #NewGlenn rocket will be able to send the #BlueMoon lander to the Lunar #Gateway. But the lander won’t have enough #propellant to make a powered descent to the lunar surface https://hackaday.com/2023/12/07/artemis-next-giant-leap-orbital-refueling/

#SpaceX #Starship #BlueOrigin #Mk1 #NASA #Artemis

SpaceX, Blue Origin share new lunar landing profiles

NASA lunar landing faces challenges as SpaceX and Blue Origin compete for the Artemis 3 mission lead.

Astronomy Magazine
#BlueOrigin will use their Lunar #Transporter for in-space 🌌 cryogenic propellant β›½ transfer. The Utility Transfer Mechanism was recently tested inside the TS300 thermal vacuum chamber at #NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. The Lunar Transporter will use similar propellant tanks to those flown on the company’s #NewGlenn rocket, and seven #BE7 engines as its main propulsion system https://spaceflightnow.com/2025/10/28/blue-origin-details-lunar-exploration-progress-amid-artemis-3-contract-shakeup/
Blue Origin details lunar exploration progress amid Artemis 3 contract shakeup – Spaceflight Now