The excellent @pluralistic highlighted this Wired article from 2015 regarding car “accidents”. The author’s story mirrors our own loss of our three year old daughter playing in front of our house in 2012. There needs to be greater accountability for people using automobiles.

https://www.wired.com/2015/10/stop-calling-daughters-death-car-accident/

#CrashNotAccident #Cars

Stop Calling My Daughter's Death a Car Accident

When we say “accident,” we are saying deaths on our cities' streets are inevitable.

WIRED

@thegaffer @pluralistic The shooting sports community has been working for years to do something similar, replacing the term "accidental discharge" with "negligent discharge" to reflect the fact that barring extremely rare mechanical malfunctions, guns don't just go off on their own.

If it fires without you intending, it's because you were doing something stupid and dangerous like having it loaded when you shouldn't have, leaving your finger on the trigger, etc.

So just like with a significant number of car crashes, it's not an accident it's negligent behavior on the part of the operator. This sort of terminology should become more prevalent in general.

@azonenberg @pluralistic @thegaffer
The number one cause of gunfire discharges is gun ownership!
@azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic Also interestingly covered in 2007's "Hot Fuzz" where Pegg's character corrects "accident" to "collision" and when asked why, says:
@eamon @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic For such a silly movie, that line has stuck with me very seriously.
@aprilfollies it's a very serious silly movie.

@eamon @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic

Thats genuinely the preferred policy of the British Emergency Services (Fire, Police and Ambulance), they always refer to a road traffic collision or incident rather than an "accident" (as /someone/ did something incorrect to make a vehicle occupy the same space as another (or another solid object, or simply ran off the road)

@vfrmedia @eamon @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic they're not perfect though. The UK police still have a bad #absentDriver habit, posting updates like 'a car and a pedestrian were in a collision' like there was no driver.
@mjr @eamon @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic this sometimes still happens in the early stages of a report, where they have to be very careful not to prejudice any Court case - even if its clear the driver is blatantly guilty, as there are very few defences for knocking down someone on foot (unless they have actively tried to attack the driver, and normally when that happens its the driver of another car as part of a road rage incident)

@mjr @vfrmedia @eamon @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic TBF unless the pedestrian jumped through the an open window of the car the driver didn't come into contact with them. Until recently there was always the understanding that a car was controlled by a human driver who is responsible for damage or injury caused by a vehicle in their control along with the roadworthiness of said vehicle. Cars, by themselves, are inanimate objects with no will of their own.

I guess it also paints a clearer picture of events as "driver" is a person controlling a vehicle. This could be as small as a unicycle or as large as a container ship. I'm not sure of the legal definition of driver though.

@securedllama @mjr @eamon @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic

for the UK Road Traffic Act 1988 a driver is the person (or persons) controlling the vehicle (a specialist large vehicle might have one person steering and another operating other controls, there's also the case of someone supervising a learner driver on L plates (who needs to be not just a qualified driver but sober and not using their mobile phone!)

If a parked car was left off the handbrake, rolled away and hit a pedestrian then the person who would normally be driving it would be liable (although it might be a different charge than a moving traffic offence).

(Self driving cars are not yet authorised for use in the UK, the legislation is still being debated in Parliament)

@eamon
I hope some of the people who watched the movie had that stuck in the back of their brain and started thinking about it.
@azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic
@azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic I have nothing against the new terminology here, but there is one difference between cars and guns. The problem with drivers is that the car infested society cannot reasonably strip someone of their license when they operate a car negligently because that's effectively grounding them and possibly starving them. The car centric urban design is probably doing 80% of the killing.

@shironeko @thegaffer @pluralistic Sure, but the goal in both cases is to point out that most of the negative outcomes in both cases are the result of someone doing something stupid and easily avoidable, and that they should not be normalized as random accidents but that we should actively work to eliminate them.

There's a subculture that says that if you spend enough time around guns you *will* eventually have an "accidental" discharge. Which is the exact kind of careless attitude the folks pushing the new term are trying to stamp out. There are true accidents - like the time I hit a raccoon that dashed out one car length in front of me on a highway at night - but a lot have identifiable, removeable root causes.

Sure, more cars statistically means more crashes, but there's a lot more in play. Everything from car-centric urban design to engineering of specific roadways to cultural attitudes around vehicle ownership (and alcohol consumption)...

@azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic yeah I just feel like whatever we call it it should highlight that it is a systemic problem. blaming things on individuals is not gonna solve any of this.
@shironeko @thegaffer @azonenberg @pluralistic I spent a few hours on a flight to DC talking to my seat mate who was going to an NIH-hosted event to lobby for better treatment for a disease that affected a family member. After about an hour I realized that the problem wasn't the lack of treatment alternatives. The problem was that by seeking a diagnosis & treatment, the patient runs the risk of having to turn in their drivers license, which is simply impractical in many parts of the US.
@RonBeavis that reminds me of the conversation I had with a gun store owner about their untreated mental illness. Great combination, created entirely by the perverse incentives built into the current legal structures.

@shironeko @thegaffer @azonenberg @pluralistic
In the USA, it is significantly easier to revoke someone's driver's license than to restrict their possession of guns.

Where I live, which is semi-rural and poorly served by public transportation, if you see a 40-year old riding a bike (or more likely, e-bike) in street clothes, you absolutely know it's because they lost their driver's license.

@RealGene @thegaffer @azonenberg @pluralistic but everybody had guns and was negligently discharging them?

@RealGene @shironeko @thegaffer @azonenberg @pluralistic

and, I imagine if it's an open carry state - it wouldn't be too out of place to see that same person on a bike or e-bike with a pistol in a holster attached to their belt.

@azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic its true! Most guns are even designed not to go off when dropped or hit -- only from pulling the trigger.

@djsf @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic Reminds me of how often I hear the analogous fact about nuclear bombs

Guns as mini-nukes, huh 🤔

SIG Sauer P320 - Wikipedia

@RealGene @azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic RIP Sig Sauer enjoyers.

Another fun one is the CZ 52, an antique Czech semiauto. I had one go off when i turned the safety on once... My finger wasnt even on the trigger lol.

I had it pointed downrange and was still in firing stance so everything was ok. But it was a great reminder why the golden rule of gun safety is what it is:

"Never point a gun at something you wouldnt want to shoot"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CZ_52

CZ 52 - Wikipedia

@azonenberg @thegaffer

Lost a neighbor that way, when their next door neighbor's "unloaded" gun went off during cleaning....

@azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic I could not agree more! Guns on their own are very safe. Put them in the hands of an inexperienced or irresponsible person and lives are at stake.
@azonenberg oh boy, German sport shooter here. Your (improved) range safety protocols would have you swiftly disqualified from the ranges following the biggest national shooting association rules (following one or another is mandatory).
I once counted: one needs to break 5 rules to even have the risk of shooting someone due to negligence. Everyone of which could get you send home swiftly.
It accepts humans making mistakes and is designed accordingly.

@aurorus I think you misunderstood... if you manage to fire a round unintentionally you've done a lot of dangerous and stupid things. Regardless of whether anyone/anything but backstop got hit.

And this sort of thing should be strongly discouraged rather than normalized as "oh it happens to everyone" which is what calling it "accidental" implies.

The entire point of using the term "negligent" is to make it very clear that the person's actions were far outside the standard of safe and acceptable behavior.

The same thing applies to calling motor vehicle collisions "accidents" rather than being more clear that in many cases the root cause is aggressive or unnecessarily risky driving practices and that we should be working as a society to eliminate them rather than treating them as normal and expected.

@azonenberg where they successful? Because that sounds like a great idea. @thegaffer @pluralistic

@azonenberg @thegaffer @pluralistic

Yep, and thats what makes the Sig Sauer P320 lawsuits and accidental mechanical failure leading to discharge so terrifying.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=M2ZwXhZyO1k

That test was done with a blank. And barely moving the slide triggers a fire, without touching the trigger.

I Got My Sig P320 To Go Off... (Re-Creating Viral Incident)

YouTube
@thegaffer @pluralistic The organization I work for fights to replace the word “accident” in all contexts, including road vehicle deaths and injuries.
@thegaffer @pluralistic there's an excellent book by Jessie Singer on this subject: There Are No Accidents.
@thegaffer I'm so sorry. Wishing you peace. Hopefully there'll be some reckoning for the excessive automobile culture and negligence.