@shironeko @thegaffer @pluralistic Sure, but the goal in both cases is to point out that most of the negative outcomes in both cases are the result of someone doing something stupid and easily avoidable, and that they should not be normalized as random accidents but that we should actively work to eliminate them.
There's a subculture that says that if you spend enough time around guns you *will* eventually have an "accidental" discharge. Which is the exact kind of careless attitude the folks pushing the new term are trying to stamp out. There are true accidents - like the time I hit a raccoon that dashed out one car length in front of me on a highway at night - but a lot have identifiable, removeable root causes.
Sure, more cars statistically means more crashes, but there's a lot more in play. Everything from car-centric urban design to engineering of specific roadways to cultural attitudes around vehicle ownership (and alcohol consumption)...