AI slop classic, somebody files a bug report for a vuln, doesn’t disclose they’ve used AI when asked, argues in the comments - and includes his AI prompt in the paste.
AI slop classic, somebody files a bug report for a vuln, doesn’t disclose they’ve used AI when asked, argues in the comments - and includes his AI prompt in the paste.
(char *)
not (char)
? Any compiler would have caught that.AI slop classic, somebody files a bug report for a vuln, doesn’t disclose they’ve used AI when asked, argues in the comments - and includes his AI prompt in the paste.
I think the open source movement is in serious trouble due to generative AI, as maintainers are going to get flooded with torrents of bad code and analysis the longer the AI hype train continues.
It’s exhausting and unsustainable if an entire generation are introduced to not knowing or caring about what they are doing.
@GossiTheDog that's what prompted me to write a Human Content Policy.
@GossiTheDog I’ve seen well meaning contributors *champion* AI for the FOSS projects they work with… and for what? Most FOSS doesn’t *need* productivity. And it certainly doesn’t need huge black spots of code with no real owners because one person shovelled in more features than they could ever reasonably understand or support. 🫠
(I have written spades on this but I just don’t have the spoons for this battle)
(char *)
not (char)
? Any compiler would have caught that.