Wait, what were we talking about?
That was "The Art of Kenny Who?", a Judge Dredd story.
At the time, it was a satire of how comics companies exploit workers by giving them punishing deadlines and dropping them when they can't keep up, but maintain all rights and copyrights to their work and continue to make money off the writers' ideas. So of course the capitalists decided to make it literal.
Sigh. I sure wish the Chicken Littles had taken a little more linear algebra.
Just saying.
It does furnish the working vocabulary and terms of art
Training AI models usually involves optimization, which means finding the best set of parameters (weights and biases) to minimize an error function. This process heavily relies on concepts like gradients (derivatives of multi-variable functions) and iterative updates, all of which are intrinsically linked to linear algebraic principles.
I'll just say it: linear algebra becomes indispensable for the computations that drive AI.
Matrix multiplication are central to neural networks, where input data is transformed through layers of weights to produce outputs.
Concepts like eigenvalues and eigenvectors are crucial in dimensionality reduction techniques (e.g., PCA) that simplify complex datasets, making them more manageable for algorithms.
@Emmaf_77 @ahltorp @maxleibman
Simply put, without the vocabulary of linear algebra, including all the calculus of loss and error functions, gradient descent, even backprop is the chain rule - if you can't do the math, do everyone a favor and don't embarrass yourself by saying dumb things.
Stats and Probability fill in for noisy data, inferential statistics, combinatorics, optimization theory.
But linear algebra is the vocabulary of these things.
โฆ and who might think they can intelligently discuss AI _without_ linear algebra? Riddle me that, Magnus.
@tuban_muzuru @maxleibman Then what is โAIโ to you? Is it limited to machine learning that is linear algebra based? Neither โAIโ nor โmachine learningโ is necessarily based in linear algebra, so you only seem to only mean โAIโ in a post-deep-ANN sense.
And studying the effects of fancy chatbots can be done perfectly well without knowing one iota of linear algebra, which I know partly because I know linear algebra and partly because I know things besides linear algebra.
@maxleibman > Wait, what were we talking about?
Singularity worship.
There are 5 main reasons creatives hate AI:
1) Consent: Grabs their work without asking.
2) Credit: Doesn't give them credit.
3) Compensation: Doesn't pay them.
4) Commodification: Trivializes the craft they learned diligently, over time.
5) Replacement: Takes their paying gigs away.
Then as you pointed out, there's the environment impact.
One of the projects in my queue is:
"maLcoLM: the ethical AI", which addresses ALL these concerns.
1/n
Artists voluntarily submit their work as training data to maLcoLM.
maLcoLM credits artists.
maLcoLM pays artists automatically anytime a derivative work is generated, in exact proportion to the extent their original work contributed to the derived work.
maLcoLM is a tribute to artists' hard work, a super-charged creative tool to let them take creativity to the next level.
maLcoLM will generate more paying work at a higher level of sophistication, not replace people.
2/n
Please share your thoughts on this.
Do you think artists hate AI too much to ever open up to this concept?
Would you ever contribute art/music/writing/code to maLcoLM?
Thanks!
3/3/
@arne_mertz @purrperl You have made a very valid point with this. AI is all so very new, and we have yet so far to go in understanding and be able to use AI to our benefit and to its full potential.
I'm looking forward to doing much research into this.
Stay blessed.
Thanks for asking!
Artists are paid every time a work is exchanged for money. This could mean a flat fee code generation service, or NFTs in case of art such as paintings, music, etc.
maLcoLM ties into AlohaCoin2, also a WIP:
https://blog.glue.earth/2023/10/alohacoin2-proposal-for-new-form-of.html
Energy sources:
https://paper.wf/penumbrage/hawaiian-renaissance
As for unethical AI competition, people hate them enough to outlaw and/or boycott them & run them out of town.
Original art = 1-author NFT / direct sale
Derived art = multi-author NFT
More?
@purrperl @maxleibman I happened upon Mastrodon while doing an assignment for school.
Not only am I happy that I stumbled upon this amazing place, but thank everyone of you for being here submitting your thoughts, your knowledge, and providing information that I otherwise would never know about.
In saying this, thank you for your post, I have never heard of MalColm myself and will definitely take a peek-see to find out more about it and how it would benefit me.
Thank you.
Thanks. Glad you liked the idea.
maLcoLM is one of the planned offerings of this venture, which is a work-in-progress:
https://gitlab.com/we-glue-earth/we.glue.earth
Free Software is DIY.
Like something?
Jump in and help build it.
Something missing or something that could be improved?
Help out! Send Pull Requests, make pages to write documentation, help in any way you can. Do tell your friends about the project.
It's OUR world. Help build it and shape it.
Mahalo!
@maxleibman the question I often ask myself, especially with regards to the art theft of AI, is: does having the ability to instantly generate art actually make society better?
I just don't see the point. We create art to express ourselves. When a machine does it for us, the machine is doing most of the expressing for us.
The only situation I can really see there being a point is for people who view the creative process as an impediment to maximizing profi- ohhhhh...
@constancies @maxleibman most people I know can differentiate between "great art that is supposed to mean something" vs. a "funny picture that makes me smile for 4 minutes".
AI image generation is used for the second purpose by most everyday folk. For the corporate types, they've been doing soulless "art" work for decades, the kinds of stuff their creatives did had no, or only traces of "self-expression" anyways.
@maxleibman Car transport is not controversial, even though it has
- bigger environmental impact
- massive cost of manufacturing and producing the energy for it
- environmental and cultural destruction via road building
- stress on its users who often go psychotic
- stress on bystanders by noise
- devaluation of human life
- losses of limb and health
- sustained by government subsidies to keep it "affordable"
Cars are much worse than AI. โ๏ธ
@corvid @maxleibman well I think is interesting to compare different issues, and see how people react.
I believe it is a good post for that reason, as the OP listed things they think are bad about AI, so I can give an itemized list of what things that are also pushed down our throats by megacorps (but have been for so long we don't even notice) and see the differences / similarities is informative, and it is important to keep things in perspective.
@corvid I know. The post/reply is not for that specific person, who probably already muted me anyways.
It is intended to make anti-AI gearheads to think a bit. I find it something that might be of value, but of course you are free to disagree.
Yeah, no.
@DoNotPunchDown @maxleibman actually, yes.
How many people you know were killed by AI? because I lost people to car traffic, and every day people die in traffic violence.
It is important to keep things in perspective.
Yeah. No
39,345 left this world due to cars in 2023 in the USA alone.
you are grasping at straws.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-2023-traffic-fatalities-2024-estimates
I'm grasping at straws? From someone comparing something that is new, an unknown, that is accelerating climate change that will kill tens of thousands, to car crashed?
Yeah. No.
@DoNotPunchDown the level of brainwashing the car industry did on people is astounding.
Cars have ALREADY KILLED hundreds of thousands. Those are people, who never got to meet their loved ones again because of cars. And you just ignore it as "well, I like my car so cars killing people is just 'car crashed' "... this level of dehumanization blows my mind.
And "accelerating climate change"? Have you seen what the car industry is doing and has been doing for about a century now?
@nicemicro @DoNotPunchDown What is it about a certain breed of activist that a) tries to tie literally everything to their pet cause, and b) does it in a way that it drives even sympathetic people away from said cause.
I haven't owned a car since 2001. I use nothing but public transit with the VERY infrequent taxi here and there for those few things public transit isn't good for.
And now, just to spite you, I want to buy a V8 SUV and drive it on the highway in low gear.
Great PR there, dude!
๐ซถ
Same. I live in the city and having a car is not a necessity. Additionally, I was hit by a car and ended up in the hospital for 3 weeks.
But assuming is always easier for some. ๐โ๐ป