@hypercritical I'm not sure if current leadership has any monopoly on anti competitive behavior at Apple. It was 20 years ago when Apple leadership all the way up to the CEO started engaging in anti competitive hiring practices that artificially lowered wages for workers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation
@vanvoorden @hypercritical yeah. The problem is not leadership. The problem is power. Jobs would have always loved to have the power to demand this kind of stuff from users and developers. He would quite possibly be worse.
I’m not sure it’s possible for any company to have this kind of power and not turn into an abusive monopolist. But Apple was already constitutionally set up to abuse anyone it’s in a relationship with.
@hypercritical "It’s time for new leadership at Apple. The road we’re on now does not lead anywhere good for Apple or its customers. It’s springtime, and I’m choosing to believe in new life."
Thanks for writing this!
I also would love to see new leadership at Apple. Even so, I'm not sure that a change will bring better treatment of its customers or developers.
@siracusa @jimmyjamesuk
I suspect there were plenty of sleazy suits at Apple during Jobs' era. But while Apple owes its success to the collaborative efforts of many highly talented people over the years, it's pretty clear that Steve Jobs was the guiding force (however flawed) that brought it all together to create magic.
I’m not optimistic that anyone else can rekindle that today.
Had an #apple Music subscription stopped it for 2 months and lost 20 years of playlists...😡 I love #freeform checked were it stores my files on the mac and... it doesn't... it's cloud only (files are not mine anymore) 🙄. Trying to leave the walled garden to #linux check my music library and... it's not on the mac anymore (l payed the apple tax for a 2tb ssd!)... i learnt not to fight the apple way of doing things and adopt it... Now i don't trust it anymore!
@RandyClayton @hypercritical There’s no way the big shareholders will allow a CEO to let Apple fall out of the Fortune 3. After all, as Milton Friedman would remind us, the purpose of corporations is to generate as much profit and shareholder value as possible.
Apple under Tim Cook chose to be great when they could have chosen to be good. They can’t be both.
@hypercritical
No one can say for certain how different Apple would be today if Jobs were still around, but I think it's pretty safe to say that, after his passing, it was only their financial success that kept the shine on the company.
Once we reached peak iPhone and there were no other products with comparable impact in the pipeline, Apple was destined to join their competitors in the dirty game of enshittification. And I think it’s all downhill from here.
@hypercritical @marcoarment The content - sure good 👍
But let me thank you for using commas and paragraphs, both in a way that helps reading longer texts without starting sentences all over again 3 times 😀
I know this should be normal, common sense - but it isn’t. So thank you for valuing your readers ⭐️