There's a really good few chapters about it in Doppelganger, Naomi Klein's new book. I've been slowly getting through it, and a really good read.
Why are so few women in management positions? The popular explanations range from women just aren’t capable of being leaders to women just don’t want to be leaders. According to the author, however, the absence of women in leadership roles has less to do with women themselves and more to do with how we interpret leadership traits. Confidence – a trait more associated with men – is often misinterpreted as competence. As a result, charismatic, but incompetent men have fewer barriers to reach the top than women. Individuals in positions to promote and hire managers should think more critically about what seems like a leadership trait versus what is an actual leadership trait. They will find that arrogance and overconfidence – the characteristics that get men into management positions – are also the characteristics that cause poor performance.
@Daojoan I think this is a fault in the human condition tbh.
And us not ready to recognise it is another.
We seek comfort in closing our eyes from our own shortcomings!
@Daojoan two jobs ago, I admitted to a client I wasn't an expert in Shopify, while trying to provide support.
That resulted in being yelled at by two of our lawyers; a sales Rep; my boss; my boss's boss; and my boss's boss's boss.
Yet the sales Rep (the one that yelled at me) that had literally lied directly to the client's face about us having a dedicated Shopify team — to secure the contract — got protected.
via social media algos, ad payment models and shitty civic/media educations.
Maybe we should bring back analytical inteligence and drop the emphasis on getting along since emotional intelligence has come to mean making your associates happy in order to avoid being fired.
This has always been a problem.
@Daojoan Well, confidence has been interpreted as competence for longer than I've been alive and I'm not exactly a young 'un.
IIRC, it's a very common cognitive bias even in non-western societies, but maybe I'm just comforting myself.
The operative phrase there is “pays better”. Capitalism as a moral compass puts truth aside. As Steve Forbes unabashedly said when he ran for POTUS (which, ironically, everyone thought was a joke back then): “We should follow the golden rule; the person with the gold makes the rules”. Now, we live it.
Hundreds of years from now, whatever social structure comes next will look back on capitalism as we today look back at feudalism — with horror & saying “how did people live that way for so long”?