I mean, not "a" plan perhaps? Many, many plans. Made for different parts of the city, or for different aspects. Implemented partly, abandoned, replaced with new plans for extending on what the previous plans accomplished - or to tear the accomplishments down, and make something new, "better".
Some cities succeed better than others in becoming places that are welcoming & human-friendly, integrating plenty of green areas, spaces for walking, bicycles, etc.
@snaums
> The computer equivalent of cars
portable, complicated internally, can get you where you want to go (most of the time) even when cognitively impaired, eye-wateringly expensive for the system as a whole, requires specialized knowledge and infrastructure to support
... so, JavaScript. Checks out
There is no utility for either of us in leaping into a fight for the honor of JavaScript
And yes of course there are alternatives to cars, even in America
@snaums @GossiTheDog Where do you live that you think American cities have plans?
I live in New York, and except for the 1811 grid--which only includes part of one borough, Manhattan, and was instituted almost two centuries after Europeans arrived here--we got no plan.
And the first woodpecker to come around would destroy civilization:
@bsdphk @GossiTheDog I thought of this immediately, but you shared it first.
Great minds think alike?
A fairly good explanation of technical debt also 🙂
Kill It with Fire, Marianne Bellotti
Attached: 1 image A good quote to start Kill it With Fire:
@cybertailor Also, engineered cities in China.
It's actually a pretty good idea, I would say.
I think the comparison is very insulting to many (but not all) cities, tbh 😄
@RL_Dane @GossiTheDog With or without plans, to the degree an urban area "takes off" then the rebuilding-the-747-while-we're-in-the-air metaphor also becomes applicable.
Flying cities!
I love that quote. It is so painfully true about the software development process