🧵1/N
@poleguy imagining this as a violent struggle is absurd fantasy.
I) The people elected Trump. People are not kept in line by the fear of the army, at least for now, half of them support him.
II) Pro-democratic movement was so far unable to mobilize people to stage massive protests. How many people are protesting against Trump? Few thousands at most? What percentage of them would join much more dangerous armed resistance?
Now is time for efficient unarmed civil resistance.
@petergleick
@poleguy 🧵2/2
Read up on Erica Chenoweth's work about non-violent resistance, she made a large analysis of many campaigns in the past.
Learn from them (e.g. Slovak succesfull proests to depose Fico in 2018, Czechoslovak velvet revolution, Belarussian failed campaign, Georgian ongoing protests, or the Ukrainian Maydan,...).
Without massive protests, you can't have resistance (armed or non-violent), and once you have them, you (hopefully) won't need the violence. So start there.
Supposedly the Constitution provides guidance for what to do when we have internal enemies, but unfortunately, the Founders never foresaw that all three branches of government would be our enemies.
The only way to attack and defeat a country with a military larger than all other countries militaries combined, iui s from the inside.
One would admire the craft of it, if it was not happening for real.
Yup.