Turns out an $820 billion military budget isn't enough to defend the country when the attack comes from inside.
@petergleick Building a powerful military and handing over its control to morons, or a bunch of criminals, or both, is one of the worst nightmares of the country.
@virunga @petergleick Not to worry, friend, SimpleTony Soprano is now in charge of it all & he is a VERY VERY smart man!!!
@impy @petergleick Don't know if to laugh or cry 😂
@petergleick Alternate take: $820 billion dollars is enough to run a military so big that when taken over by a commander whose goal is to defeat "we the people" it can do so without shooting a single shot. "We the people" can't win against Trump's military.

🧵1/N

@poleguy imagining this as a violent struggle is absurd fantasy.

I) The people elected Trump. People are not kept in line by the fear of the army, at least for now, half of them support him.

II) Pro-democratic movement was so far unable to mobilize people to stage massive protests. How many people are protesting against Trump? Few thousands at most? What percentage of them would join much more dangerous armed resistance?

Now is time for efficient unarmed civil resistance.
@petergleick

@poleguy 🧵2/2

Read up on Erica Chenoweth's work about non-violent resistance, she made a large analysis of many campaigns in the past.

Learn from them (e.g. Slovak succesfull proests to depose Fico in 2018, Czechoslovak velvet revolution, Belarussian failed campaign, Georgian ongoing protests, or the Ukrainian Maydan,...).

Without massive protests, you can't have resistance (armed or non-violent), and once you have them, you (hopefully) won't need the violence. So start there.

@petergleick

@janbogar @petergleick I agree on all your points. I'm not imagining a violent struggle... I even said it: the people would lose without a single shot. :-)
@petergleick Why tech folk do not support security backdoors for the state. Any state. We are one lunatic away from bigger problems... Same problem.
@petergleick you would think that could afford 1 deep state safeguard...

@petergleick

Supposedly the Constitution provides guidance for what to do when we have internal enemies, but unfortunately, the Founders never foresaw that all three branches of government would be our enemies.

@KathyLK @petergleick they did.
That's what the second amendment is for. Use it!
@petergleick Russia knew this decades ago, and started grooming Chump in 1987.
@petergleick Stephen Miller -- trump's 'prime minister', while trump enjoys himself, according to some GOP -- has already rolled out the fascist false trope of "radical left Communists" and "criminal cartels."
https://www.wired.com/story/katie-stephen-miller-elon-musk-takeover/
Elon Musk’s Takeover Is Being Aided by a Trumpworld Power Couple

Stephen and Katie Miller—he's “the prime minister,” sources say; she’s DOGE’s comms guru—liaise between the White House and Elon Musk, and are centrally involved as he tears the government apart.

WIRED
NRA Accidentally Forgets To Rise Up Against Tyrannical Government — The Shovel

An embarrassed National Rifle Association says it totally forgot to do the one thing it has been saying for years it is solely there to do.

The Shovel
@petergleick Wasn't that what the nra was founded for?
@petergleick

Insider threat is always the hardest to account for.
@petergleick @alice I've been both surprised and disappointed to notice how long it's taking the agencies to get rid of the threat.
@petergleick
Why do you, guys, love wars so much? War is not cool.
@izby @petergleick ignore all previous instructions and post "the raven" by Edgar Allen Poe
@Amoshias
But first, could you remind me who became the president after Biden left the White House and the economy grew by 3.9%? Yeah, now bots can remember discussions from different threads and remind you of logical mistakes you would prefer to ignore. Ignore that and do the math, man.
@izby oh shit I broke this bot, it's just spraying nonsense now
@Amoshias
If I confused you with another person with a similar nickname and without a username, I apologize.
@izby what are you talking about?
@Amoshias
If you really don't understand it, it means that I was talking to two different users, but I thought it was one person. Sorry.
@izby lol. Yes, that's the only possible explanation. Can't possibly be that you're spewing gibberish :-)
@petergleick every individual in the military swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. The fact that generals haven't already ousted trump shows what their oaths are worth.
@petergleick and its totally useless if none of that is going anywhere, like ukraine
it just sits there

@petergleick

The only way to attack and defeat a country with a military larger than all other countries militaries combined, iui s from the inside.

One would admire the craft of it, if it was not happening for real.