A short(ish) thread on today's SCOTUS (5-4) decision saying EPA cannot require cities to limit discharge of sewage they dump into the ocean. This decision, as noted in the dissent by the four women justices, rests on an unsubstantiated theory invented by the #SCOTUS conservative majority. The dissent says "The Court offers nothing to substantiate [their] proposition, and it is wrong as a matter of ordinary English".
But there's more. The majority, in defending their decision to take away a tool EPA can use to reduce #water pollution, offers the following justification. "If the EPA does its work, our holding should have no adverse effect on water quality." That's a hole you could drive a massive uncontrolled sewage discharge through given the Trump EPA.
In dissent, four justices say: "taking a tool away from EPA may make it harder for the Agency to issue the permits that municipalities and businesses need in order for their discharges to be lawful."
In short, this decision will make it harder for EPA to achieve the objectives of the Clean Water Act and easier for cities and industries to continue to sidestep water pollution regulations.
Here’s the decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-753_f2bh.pdf