Because #BlueSky is where all the “kool kids” want to be (probably cuz it originated as an exclusive invite only & they weren’t invited).
Also,those $30 mil aren’t gonna spend themselves…
#activityPub #mastodonMigration
Meanwhile, mastodon made this announcement 👇🏽
Is it just me but do neither of these guys actually look human to you?
Notably, BlueSky is not decentralized. Parts of the protocol require BlueSky's servers even if you're running your own instance.
It's not decentralized, It's *less-centralized*.
The problem here is, of course, mostly social, not technical.
It is similar to the "Year of the Linux Desktop" that never actually comes. There might be some tiny element that Linux is somehow technically "inferior" or "more difficult" than M$, but the real reason Windows maintains its position is the various forms of lock in they have. But a laptop and Windows is already on it. Windows is used at work. You have 10 years of Word documents. Etc. etc. etc.
Even more so with social media. As long as her friends and family are on FB, my SO will be on FB. She already knows Zuck is a Nazi, but every week has her FB Messenger session with her sisters, buys and sells her hobby stuff on FB marketplace, scrolls Reels constantly.
I assume that FB will collapse suddenly when some other massive tech company sets up a similar one stop service that is non-Nazi and everyone jumps at once. Frankly, I think this is a huge opportunity for Apple, but I digress.
But whatever it is, surely FB (and Xhitter) will collapse suddenly when they reach some kind of Malcolm Gladwell type tipping point when "everyone" decides that "everyone" is "over there" now.
As I have repeatedly written, I would LOVE to use Bluesky but will not until they make good on their promise of adding federation, so that I can costlessly leave if they mismanage the service. This letter calls on them to do so. I like Activitypub because it's federated, not because it's Activitypub. I would like any other service if they were also federated a la Activitypub.
@pluralistic @eobet @taylorlorenz
I don't think that's clear but seeing your name made me think again about what I was reading and this reasoning popped up. I have a hard time believing that most of the others joining this effort make that distinction. any chance of working within the group to get it to focus on AP instead, since there'd be a lot less effort involved? you'd just have to promote AP instead of getting AT folks to do so much tech revision (against invested VC interests)?
@taylorlorenz This a big challenge that I fully support.
What do you think about Mastodon as a solution for this problem?
@gumbario @taylorlorenz Not to mention, you didn't even mention ActivityPub, the Fediverse, or Mastodon in the article as an example of an existing version of what they are looking to build.
You (Taylor) post here, but you clearly don't give it enough thought to even mention it in your reporting when relevant?
@taylorlorenz I'm told that Mastodon has been mentioned as part of this plan, or invited to participate, but I'm not seeing that in the UserMag article, the project site front page or the GoFundMe campaign -- can you clarify? Thanks. ^.^
cc: @pluralistic (...the only signatory listed who seems to have a fedi account, though I could easily be missing someone)
@taylorlorenz VC funded is such a 🚩 how are they going to pay back that 30,000,000 USD with interest without selling out? Bet they're incorporating as for profit but "good for society" meme too.
That being said, I hate being pessimistic here and hope I'm just wrong.