When Hillary Clinton was the nominee, she was called "Hillary” by fans, opponents, and media alike. I was told “that's because 'Clinton' means 'Bill' in people's heads," and I didn't entirely agree, but OK.

Now Kamala Harris is the presumptive nominee, and she's "Kamala,” not "Harris.” There is no other President Harris.

Trump isn't "Donald," Biden isn't "Joe,” Obama wasn't "Barack.” In 2016, it was possible that this wasn't gendered. But I can’t buy that anymore.

I don't think it's inherently sexist to call Harris "Kamala." I get that some fans will feel she's familiar, just like there exist fans of Biden who jovially call him “Joe” or fans of Obama who call him "Barack." But, in general, I think it's unduly familiar, *especially* coming from media outlets.
I'm muting this thread because it has achieved context escape velocity and because the federated nature of Mastodon means I'm getting the same few replies over and over from different people.
Data point: I just heard Jen Palmieri (Clinton campaign comms director) interviewed on NPR, and she said that Hillary Clinton hates being called “Hillary” as a general identifier.
@waldoj then an odd choice in merchandise considering
@griesar I think you’re seeing the bind that women find themselves in as candidates. Remember when she had to promote her chocolate chip cookie recipe in, like, 1993? She knew that was BS, but she also knew how powerful women have to pull their punches by adhering to gender stereotypes.
@waldoj Agreed. But politics is full of every bullshit stereotype as yardsticks.
@waldoj 1960's playing dress up and my neighbor wanted to play 'bride'; wrote her name as "Mrs. John Smith" and I decided I would never lose either my first name or my last to marriage. So, I still bear my patronymic. What was I going to do? Take my mother's patronymic instead? It's fraught.

@waldoj

I guess it could be, but I was just thinking that it's the "stronger" of the names for her.

It happens with athletes a lot, even the greats...like "Jordan" vs "LeBron".

@GregNilsen I'll be interested to see how the campaign decides to brand her. Right now, it's "Harris for President." But if they settle on "Kamala,” then I think it's entirely understandable for people to repeat that messaging.
@waldoj @GregNilsen Her first ad I saw had a logo "Kamala For The People"
@waldoj @GregNilsen
Just a note from a Kiwi experience.
Most of our country , New Zealand, referred to our then Prime Minister as Jacinda in preference to Ardern.
Nothing wrong in doing so. She didn't mind a bit.
@waldoj this ☝️☝️☝️
@waldoj I always thought we referred to politicians by their brands, which they create themselves, and sell.
@jimfl The campaign has branded her as “Harris," but perhaps in less-formal communications they've done otherwise?
@jimfl Interestingly, in 2020, Booker branded himself as “Cory” and Klobuchar branded herself as “Amy”, but neither of those caught on; they were still generally just called Booker and Klobuchar.
@waldoj I think when the other party keeps insisting on calling their candidate “President Trump,” or (worse) “The President”, it’s reasonable to show as much deference to VP Harris as possible.
@waldoj I think part of it is that Biden and Trump are more distinctive that Joe and Donald, and Hilary and Kamala are more distinctive than Clinton and Harris. Barack Obama were both distinctive, so Obama was formal and Barack was familiar or condescending, It absolutely reflects the primacy of both male and Anglo names in politics, but yes, it manifests as (over)familiarity. In any sort of formal context, it’s absolutely VP Harris.
@debcha Ooh, good point about male, Anglo names.

@debcha @waldoj This feels like justification after the fact. I can buy it for Clinton, but not for Harris.

In memes and marketing, first names get used all the time, because those can be familiar, but as OP said, it’s absurd for her first name to be used in the media. It’s the “females and men” all over again.

@debcha @waldoj i don't think Ronald is a common name.
Last name usage has some authority to it.
Even the army and police usually refer to the last names.
@waldoj I’m kind of reminded of the not-a-joke that there are more people named, like, Matt in a given tech company than there are women, so the male-coded names need disambiguation and the female-coded names don’t. And I also absolutely agree that this is where implicit bias creeps in — I get Ms Chachra where my male peers get Dr or Prof, so it’s something to be aware of.

@waldoj I remember there being an early attempt to brand Biden as "Joe", but it just didn't stick and they quickly stopped trying. Joe is a very "regular guy" name, which is probably why they initially pushed it. And of course Sanders has always been "Bernie".

But I agree, those seem to be exceptions rather than the rule for male candidates at this level.

@mattblaze @waldoj in Canada, Pierre tried to continually do exactly this by calling the PM “Justin”. When he became leader of the opposition, he was forced to stop referring to the PM by first name due to rules of decorum in parliament.

Kamala is like Liza, Madonna, Oprah, Beyoncé: she has the cultural cachet to go by her first name only.

there is only one Liza. i will never be the Liza. that's cultural cachet and Kamala can swing that like a big dick all she wants.

and as one should.

@waldoj

@blogdiva @waldoj I'd prefer to leave it up to her. But as for me, I'll just refer to her as

Madam President!

#uspol #KamalaHarris2024

@waldoj She changed the name of the Twitter account to KamalaHQ, so she's leaning into the first name, but I’m still sticking with “Harris” to refer to her unless she makes an explicit request otherwise.

@waldoj @amaditalks I personally will always address female politicians by their last names because, even if it’s in good faith to speak with affection or familiarity, it is different from how we treat male politicians and it can come off as disempowering.

#USpol

@waldoj I always always refer to her in writing as VP Harris, or her full name, explicitly because of this act of diminuation. She doesn’t make it easy though, with “Kamala for the People” as a slogan, and KamalaHQ. It’s a unique (-ish) name in politics, so I accept the market branding, but I will only call her Kamala privately among friends. Never in public.

@waldoj I don’t like it when anybody does it, for any politician.

Politicians shouldn’t even have “fans,” IMHO — and that goes triple for media outlets.

I don’t think it’s particularly sexist, though. People have done this familiarizing thing with male presidential candidates for as long as I can remember. Sometimes it’s a first name (“Mitt,” “Barry”) and sometimes it’s a middle name (“Dubya”).

@waldoj True but I had her campaign stickers from 2020, they literally just said “Kamala” on them; it seems to be something she’s chosen at various times rather than had thrust upon her.
@migurski Well, that her campaign has chosen. I'm reminded of Theodore Roosevelt, who absolutely *despised* being called "Teddy” (except when he was president, his staff called him “Colonel”). I have to wonder the extent to which gender roles obliged that occasional branding. Today, the campaign website calls her "Harris," but my hunch is they haven't entirely figured that out yet.

@waldoj @migurski I also remember all the sexist machinations that went to renaming her Hillary rodham Clinton vs Hillary rodham, i.e. let’s tack her husband’s name on to make the super competent wife be less threatening as a First Lady.

We’re so awful.

@Drwave @waldoj That cookie recipe competition from 1992
@waldoj And we called Clinton “Bubba”
@waldoj a big difference is her social media campaign is named “Kamala HQ” (renamed from “Biden HQ”). It’s a smart move. When someone tries to devalue her by using just her first name, they amplify the brand.

@waldoj “jovially call him ‘Joe’”

👏👏👏

@waldoj

I have Biden has "Joe" but mostly because I like him and fully agree with your point. I will be mindful "short naming" Kamala Harris as "Harris"

@waldoj

1) i believe you
2) although istr “Geraldine Ferraro” and “Mondale/Ferraro”
3) clearly we need a much larger sample size of female Pres candidates to resolve this question

@thatandromeda I wonder how Ferraro was referred to at the time, outside of the campaign branding. (I was a very small child at the time, so I've got no idea.) Harris is branded as "Harris" by the campaign, after all.
@waldoj I was pretty small BUT my mom was very political and this campaign was a huge exciting moment for me (...I um led a protest at my kindergarten because the boys were monopolizing the playground equipment, with signs and everything, because I was so hyped by her example, and much later wrote an award-winning essay about it that I read at the LoC, ANYWAY) what I remember is what I wrote above
@waldoj It's probably gendered. It's probably not bad for her. As anecdata, Baltimore County Executive Johnny Olszewski Jr. campaigned for his current office and is currently campaigning for MD-2 as "Johnny O" so he doesn't have to teach people how to pronounce Ol-shes-key.
@waldoj Trump will be “Weird Donald” soon enough
@waldoj I get that, but 'Harris' is an anonymous sounding surname. 'Kamala' might have the ring of 'Madonna' or 'Adele' or 'Whitney'. I don't see it as a sexist thing.

@davidpnice @waldoj agreed, I think it’s better branding. It’s a unique name, looks and sounds interesting… Harris is very generic.

I bet if Obama’s last name was Johnson, he would have gone with Barack.

@waldoj

I refer to Dem/lefty pols as "Bill". "Hillary" or "the Hill". "Joe". "Bernie".

Kamala Harris will be "Harris" at least in my very red area because I just think it normalizes her existence. People will NOT focus on policy here, just her identity. Calling her "Harris" makes her no different than "Bush", "Carter", and "Reagan". I don't mean to cancel her ethnicity, I want to NORMALIZE her as a **human being** asking for a job to my local racists and 💩heads.

@waldoj Perhaps it is as simple as choosing the most distinctive, unambiguous of the names?
@waldoj One possible out is that Joe and Donald are relatively common names, so when using them it isn't clear who you are talking about. Same with Harris.
@waldoj
A bit premature, perhaps? Or hopefully?
@waldoj you're telling me people *dont* call her harris?

@waldoj @inthehands

Folks referred to bush2 as “W” dubya. - still do.

I think the catchiest branding is what wins.

PS I still have a Birdy Sanders sticker on my fridge.

@waldoj when I was Director of Grad Studies in my uni department, I received more emails than I can shake a stick at asking “Miri” for help getting into “Prof Whiteman’s” or “Prof Otherwhiteman’s” seminar, even though my academic email signature includes my academic credentials and institutional title. In college my professors were “Dr Whiteman,” “Dr Otherwhiteman,” “Dr Yetanotherwhiteman,” and “Carol.” Was ever thus.

@waldoj

Agreed use 'Harris' or 'Kamala Harris'.

But call Trump 'Donald' because he hates it.

@waldoj @dangillmor Let’s see what her campaign prefers.
@waldoj I will call her whatever she wants, although my personal preference is President Harris.
@waldoj Media sources should stick to one format - Harris.

@waldoj
"Harris" is a common name.

9 states have cities named Harris.

The elementary school I attended was named Harris.

Wikipedia's List of Notable People with the Surname Harris has literally hundreds of entries.

Even "President Harris" might refer to one of four different people, only one of whom is fictional.

She's getting firstnamed for clarity, just like Hillary

@waldoj if she's "kamala" then I think he has to be "donny-boy."