I think the one free service I trust not to someday fuck up on me is Neocities, and that only because it appears to be run by ideologues (the fact it is run with an explicit anti-growth policy, and that the service it offers is intentionally so limited, also helps)
PS check out my web sight on neocities!! https://mcc.neocities.org/
@[email protected] Given that they've been holding onto the full history but only letting you see the most recent messages for years, I actually think it's an improvement if they start deleting posts that they won't show you anyway. Doesn't make it any less of a trap, of course
I *also* hate how much sense this makes. https://feed.hella.cheap/@bob/statuses/01J158M7XFJ3ETD5GGXDV8BHXC
(Normally at this point I'd go down a rabbit hole of scrutinizing Slack's TOS/privacy policy with a magnifying glass trying to figure out whether anything legally binds Slack to Actually Delete everything that gets deleted from the service, but that is probably not the best possible use of my morning.)
@[email protected] what makes you think "delete" means actually delete and not update posts set deleted=true
@foolishowl @mcc I too gave Mattermost Team server (the non-Enterprise, free and Open Source version) a try for a couple of years. I had about 140 casual, light users, total.
Should anyone else like to test Mattermost Team server out, I wrote an installation guide (slightly dated, but effectively should still work) for installing it on a Raspberry Pi:
https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?f=131&t=269505&p=1635472#p1635472
@mcc @bob Oh yeah, I now see that the linked post already said basically the same thing as I did, sorry for the repetition.
But I don't really see the upside for Slack in that scenario since it would not save them any storage costs while removing a powerful sales motivator (And I have no doubts they're already training some AI nonsense on customer data and would sell data to OpenAI or similar in a heartbeat).
@chriscunningham @mcc Especially Google. I *really* need to move off my (still free) business e-mail accounts (they changed the T&Cs to make historically free accounts non free for businesses, but I'm not using mine for commercial purposes). Functionality changes you can't opt out of *even if* you pay them money.
The most important question is how easily your data can be transferred to an equivalent service.
My business advice would be to never sign up to anything where data export isn't included free of charge in your contract. It doesn't have to be already present, but it has to be free, and well defined as to what and how it will be exported.
@jamey @mcc 100%, I'd much rather they scrub the history of the purely social free-plan Slacks I'm on. We all only really want those to be transient anyways, I'll be happy for them to save themselves the storage costs.
This _is_ a problem for orgs that end up needing/wanting to be on a free-plan runway for more than a year, though, for sure.
@mcc How big is your personal data backup?
@mcc This has been apparent for some time. And it is one of many reasons why the #p2p project #Autonomi is going to make waves.
It provides cloud like storage, pay once stored forever, for real. It is an autonomous network with a built in economy based on those wanting storage rewarding those who are providing it. Privacy and security designed in from the ground up.
At least that's the plan, and we will soon be able to see if it works: launches in October.
@mcc And I'm not sure you can trust them just because you're paying money either.
A lot of the promise of centralized services was that this wouldn't happen. If all the data is going to be deleted anyway, maybe it's not so bad to just self-host without any backups.
I never trusted them anyway...