Google AI just telling people to drink piss. Perfect, no notes.
Google AI just telling people to drink piss. Perfect, no notes.
@gamingonlinux google is a neil cicierega fan
Get the album here:http://www.neilcic.com/mouthsilence/
Must be different on the phone. Good to know. I stand corrected. Thanks.
There is a NASA ISS quality fluid processing step .... missing? Maybe the plane landed in... NYC? idk AI, idk, does this pass the pee test on landing or just at the airport when the AI landed without the AI Transparency, Accountability, Auditing, Entrails Log Report due ... as a KPI, for obvious reasons?
Drink urine
A screenshot of a Google search results page with the query "how to pass kidney stones quickly" highlighted in the search bar. Below the search bar, there is a section labeled "AI overviews are experimental. Learn more."
Well this certainly explains why whenever I open Fox News lately along with all the pop-ups to invest in gold, and Dr. Oz’s Miracle Cures, there’s suddenly a huge push by McDonald’s in conjunction with 7/11 touting the new and apparently delicious Piss McFlurry.
And ... Google search isn't presenting an AI overview on that query any more.
"There is zero artificial intelligence today. There could have been, but 50 years ago the decision was made by most scientists and companies to go with machine learning, which was quick and easy, instead of the difficult task of actually reverse engineering and then replicating the human brain.
So instead what we have today is machine learning combined with mass plagiarism which we call ‘generative AI’, essentially performing what is akin to a magic trick so that it appears, at times, to be intelligent.
While the topic of machine learning is complex in detail, it is simple in concept, which is all we have room for here. Essentially machine learning is simply presenting many thousands or millions of samples to a computer until the associative components ‘learn’ what it is, for example pictures of a daisy from all angles and incarnations.
Then companies scoured the internet in the greatest crime of mass plagiarism in history, and used the basic ability of machine learning to recognize nouns, verbs, etc. to chop up and recombine actual human writings and thoughts into ‘generative AI’.
So by recognizing basic grammar and hopefully deducing the basic ideas of a query, and then recombining human writings which appear to match that query, we get a very faulty appearance of intelligence - generative AI.
But the problem is, as I said in the beginning, there is no actual intelligence involved at all. These programs have no idea what a daisy, or love, or hate, or compassion, or a truck, or horse, or wagon, or anything else, actually is. They just have the ability to do a very faulty combinatorial trick to appear as if they do.
However there is hope that actual general intelligence can be created because, thankfully, a handful of scientists rejected machine learning and instead have been working on recreating the connectome of the human brain for 50 years, and they are within a few decades of achieving that goal and truly replicating the human brain, creating true general intelligence.
In the meantime it's important for our species to recognize the danger of relying on generative AI for anything, as it's akin to relying on a magician to conjure up a real, physical, living, bunny rabbit.
So relying on it to drive cars, or control any critical systems, will always result in massive errors, often leading to real destruction and death."
SearingTruth
I am not sure I can collect that much urine every 24 hours.
Should I ask google for help on this question?