How activists blur the lines between birth control and abortion
The national debate over #IVF, unfolding after an #Alabama court decision prompted multiple clinics in the state to halt operations, prompts a question:
What might be next?
Could other fertility treatments and even birth control be under threat given that Roe v. Wade is no longer the law?
If the idea that birth control could be at risk in America strikes you as hard to believe, I understand.
There’s no proposed legislation on the table to ban it, and it does seem unbelievable that contraception
— which an overwhelming majority of US women, including religious and Republican women, have used and support
— could one day disappear.
But attacks on reproductive rights have never really been about public opinion, as the overturn of Roe showed and the current national debate over IVF has further proved.
While it’s not an immediate threat, anti-abortion leaders have been laying the groundwork to curtail contraception access for many decades, despite birth control being one of the most reliable ways to reduce the incidence of abortion.
Their fundamental opposition is rooted in a belief that penetrative sex is sacred and should only occur within a heterosexual marriage and in the service of having children.
In their eyes, birth control has encouraged sex outside of marriage
— a development they charge with weakening families, absolving men of responsibility, and steering women away from domestic duties.
“I think contraception is #disgusting, people using each other for pleasure,” said #Joseph #Scheidler, the late founder of the 🔹Pro-Life Action League🔹, an activist group that pioneered confrontational tactics like sit-ins at abortion clinics and picketing outside doctors’ homes.
The New York Times described Scheidler as the “godfather” of the movement.
#Randall #Terry, who founded the group 🔹Operation Rescue 🔹
— known for blockading and protesting abortion clinics and patients
— once laid out the logic against birth control plainly:
“Any drug or device that prevents us from having children” is “anti-child,” he said. “How do we expect to defeat child-killing in the world when we cannot defeat child-rejection in our own midst?”
(1/n)
https://www.vox.com/24087411/anti-abortion-roe-dobbs-birth-control-contraception-ivf