Seattle Times: Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get it in the air:
Seattle Times: Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get it in the air:
@cstross Isn't this what submarine guy wanted to do?
Other than the "in the air" bit, that is.
Less and less interest in flying again. :(
@cstross Time to identify that whole decision making chain and everyone in it and put them to hoeing turnips a long way from an airport.
(I'd like to believe that the engineering capacity is still there; the management needs replacing soonest if they're coming up with that stuff.)
@cstross Hence my advocacy of dooming the lot to a desolate turnip-hoeing existence. That sort of thing is nigh-impossible to fix, but it can be replaced.
It's a real pity there's no obvious parallel mechanism for the chute packing rule that could be applied to aircraft. (The parachute packers get randomly selected chutes and sent to jump. It does a lot for the quality of the chute packing.)
It's not like Boeing has skipped testing in the past and had multiple planes falling apart and killing people... Oh wait. It has ...
My answers to that proposal would be something like No Way. With much stronger language though 🤨🤦♂️
Yup
Oh yeah, THAT'S a good idea 🤦 😬
@cstross ….oof…..now a MAX 9 blows out a window, Alaska Airlines….
Alaska Airlines plane lands in Portland after losing window https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67899564
@havvyhh2
@davidho was on the flight
Attached: 1 image Because I needed another reason to never fly on a 737 MAX.
This thing should not be in the air.
Here is an excellent (long) explainer on the Boeing 737 MAX saga:
https://perell.com/essay/boeing-737-max/
#boeing #737
@cstross Fantastic timing, Boeing. On the same day as explosive decompression on 737 MAX 9...
What's next, CEO throws a baseball at it to prove the glass won't break?