Do you consider an audiobook "reading"?
#books #reading #poll
Please boost for a wider demographic and feel free to comment with opinions below 🙏
I hope no one thinks a "no" vote is some kind of vote against audiobooks. I've certainly enjoyed hearing stories read, both live and via recordings.
I consider it being "read to." When he was young, I read to my son. He wasn't reading. I was.
When I read, the book speaks to me in the voice I give it. When I listen to someone else read, I hear the voice they choose to give.
You didn't need us to give you that confidence, I hope. There are no right or wrong votes when the question begins, "Do you consider..."
@dancinyogi
More yes than no IMO.
Though the audiobook is performed.
Performed in a specific way that inevitably collopses the possible readings of the text down to a far small number of interpretations.
And the performance makes it impossible for me to interpret the book as I might have if I'd been reading the text.
A sort of constricted reading of the book.
@dancinyogi There's two things at play here. There's the technical aspect of reading, which no, an audiobook does not provide.
And then there's whether listening to an audiobook counts as having read the book. Which yes it does.
I understand the pedantic "words have meaning" folks. But I also think it's fascinating watching words evolve as new situations develop. Language is a fluid and ever changing things. Which is beautiful and sometimes frustrating.
@dancinyogi Listening to an Audiobook is 100% reading in all meaningful sense of the word. It might not be "reading" in the context of a 7 year old child (or any adult) learning to read, but beside that, anyone who already know how to read would consider reading as not just looking at a physical piece of paper, but reading a text, a message, some kind of content written by someone. In that context, which concern anyone past the learning phase, reading on a screen is reading and listening to an audio book is reading. Absorbing a text is reading.
And while we are talking about literature and audio books, let me share this extract from Cyrano de Bergerac who basically predicted audiobooks back in 1657 in his book "The Other World: Comical History of the States and Empires of the Moon".
Roughly translated from French (DeepL + minor corrections from me):
@Kellyshenanigans @dancinyogi I wrote about this in 2011. Basically, I experience most audiobooks as Vogon poetry.
I don’t think audiobooks are a lesser form of reading — they just overload me.
@dancinyogi It is not the same to me but I can see how some folks use "reading" as a bucket term that encompasses a lot of different activities.
For example if my kids have to read 20 minutes a day then an audio book is not exercising the same skills. Although there is overlap.
I think audio books are great but I don't enjoy them the same way I enjoy reading.
@dancinyogi wow looking at some of these replies, i suppose i've never "read" a book in my life, in that i have an inner voice that speaks the text when i'm doing any reading or writing, and i don't have much comprehension without it.
fun to find out after 20 years as a professional writer that i'm illiterate 😂
@dancinyogi
It depends, mostly on context.
In the context of reading to expend your mind and experiences immersion or learn about things. Yes absolutely audiobooks are reading.
But there is a difference in a audiobook on in the background while driving or sitting down closing you eyes and enjoying story.
Do miss a good illustration some times.
It was especially the case with cigar rollers, but the custom spread to many other industries: the workers would bring in someone to read aloud during the workday.
It became famous in Cuba, but it was widely seen elsewhere.
@dancinyogi By definition, they are different, but when I finish an audiobook, I add it to my "have read list" because I have experienced the story.
So for me I guess it depends on the context when your asking the question.
@dancinyogi
If someone told me they had absorbed the content and meaning of a book, I wouldn't dream of asking whether they had read it or listened to it.
However, listening and reading are not the same process or mechanism. Personally I would never listen to content if I could read it.
@dancinyogi
I don’t, but that’s just me. If I am reading a book my focus is dedicated (mostly, anyway) on the book and I get something out of it. If I am listening to a book, a podcast, anything that requires focus I usually don’t get much out of it.
I dislike ‘diagnosis’ without formal backing but I suspect a form of attention deficit is at play. My brain runs all over the place and I find after listening to something I just didn’t get much out of it.
@dancinyogi
What a can o’ worms this turned into! I commented before reading other comments and certainly see a diversity of opinion.
And that’s the key, this is a subjective question, personal to each of us and isn’t a black n white thing. I understand totally those who day ‘yes’ and am somewhat envious!
I confess I’ve never given as much thought to the definition of ‘reading’ until this thread. If I stretch myself a little bit I could extend my definition to include listening, but not today.