I just had to update my numbers for a lecture, so here's your periodic reminder: Starlink is now 55% of ALL active satellites in orbit.

And given the recent news about that awful billionaire unilaterally deciding to cut of Starlink internet access to parts of the world whenever he wants to, this is extra important to share. Why did our governments effectively gift Low Earth Orbit to one awful dude? This is so bad.

WOW lots of comments already - I can't answer all of these individually, sorry. It's actually not super easy to find satellite numbers - surprise! Private companies aren't real excited about sharing info. Best info for civilians is from @planet4589's excellent website https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html and T.S. Kelso's database https://celestrak.org/satcat/search.php. Both of these are run as side projects by individuals - not paid for by the companies launching all this stuff.
Jonathan's Space Report | Space Statistics

Jonathan McDowell's new homepage

Muting this thread now!

Some more info if you are interested in learning more about this mess in orbit from an astronomer/stargazer perspective:

-me getting interviewed by CNN about this ~18 months ago: https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2022/04/04/spacex-satellite-pollution-gothere-cnn-plus.cnn

-a 1 hour talk I gave about this ~1 year ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpdPHOAw_Us

-simulations of visible satellite distributions at many different latitudes: https://uregina.ca/~slb861/satcon.html

-SATCON2 report: https://noirlab.edu/public/announcements/ann21034/

@sundogplanets @planet4589 There is also https://space.skyrocket.de/index.html by @Skyrocket71 which is very nice and useful
Gunter's Space Page - Information on spaceflight, launch vehicles and satellites

Gunter's Space Page - Information on Launch vehicles, Satellites, Space Shuttle and Astronautics

@sundogplanets I don't think governments gave him low earth orbit, I think he just took it. That is usually what these guys do.
@railmeat Yeah, true. They gifted it by not regulating it, and he took advantage of the lack of regulation.
@sundogplanets He got permissions to launch from the US- so it’s a bit of both.
@sundogplanets @railmeat there is a lot of regulation that starlink needs to work inside of, both the ITU and local FCC equivalents, war zones have notoriously bad regulatory frameworks…
@railmeat our governments *paid* for many of these satellites. @sundogplanets

@sundogplanets one of the things I wondered, as a young aspiring aerospace engineer, was how the chicken-and-egg problem would work out in rockets

like it seemed good to make bigger rockets, but would customers show up for it? It'd be a huge business risk, etc etc

now the biggest launch provider (by far) and biggest launch customer (by far) are both owned by the same jerk

@sundogplanets America was definitely in a mindset of we want to beat other countries to the punch even if this is done through commercial enterprise.
@[email protected] This is surreal! Thanks for sharing; I didn't realize Starlink was anywhere near that predominant.

@sundogplanets

Because that is how capitalism works. It has worked like that since rich people started fencing out common land in England and the courts uphold the fencing

@jones

@sundogplanets These days I root for Kessler Syndrome

@Gojira1000 @sundogplanets Honestly, I'm kindof with you on that 😮‍💨

I'm fairly scared that within the next 50-100 years we'll see the very first for-profit asteroid mining.

One asteroid contains QUINTILLIONS of dollars worth of precious metals; a company with a monopoly would be richer than continents.

I'd PREFER for us to grow past capitalism before then, but since that seems unlikely 'no space for ANYONE' might be best🙄

Also, small note: *Kessler syndrome, not Keppler 👍

@danwentzel @sundogplanets Nationalize providing everyone with fiber and local wireless; and skip the making a mess of the sky.

For example:

SpaceX got a lot of publicity when the Hoh Tribe purchased Starlink service, but the Hoh Tribe has more quietly been building out community-owned fiber internet connections that it controls to use instead.

@sundogplanets

In a world controlled by Musk & investors:

1. Can we trust the data on climate change provided by his satellites?

2. Can we trust he isn't copying data streams on military operations over to Putin, Alwaleed bin Talal, Larry Ellison, or Mohammed bin Salman and his other investors?

3. Can we trust that the products he developed using government subsidies & taxpayer funded research will benefit the planet & democracy?

We should have long memories for folks who betray the nation

@Npars01 @sundogplanets just a word about your 1/ : Musk doesn't operate/own/control satellites doing Science. His sats are specialized for internet access.
He could refuse to provide launch services for satellites he doesn't like though.

@Npars01 @sundogplanets

"1. Can we trust the data on climate change provided by his satellites?"

Not a single one of his satellites so far provides data on climate change, so for now it is not an issue.

(1/3)

@Npars01 @sundogplanets

"2. Can we trust he isn't copying data streams on military operations over to Putin, Alwaleed bin Talal, Larry Ellison, or Mohammed bin Salman and his other investors?"

Cryptography makes sure it is not an issue. If cryptography is not used properly for sensitive data, it is an issue - but in this case an issue for the customer.
But this applies also for any other communications provider.

(2/3)

@Npars01 @sundogplanets

3. Can we trust that the products he developed using government subsidies & taxpayer funded research will benefit the planet & democracy?

I guess, no company on earth can guarantee this.
(3/3)

@Npars01 @sundogplanets
I've long suspected Musk's real goal in buying Twitter was to get everyone's DMs. What a goldmine of kompromat that must be.

@Npars01 @sundogplanets

Trust me as someone who acquired all his wealth & power from the labour of the workers.

@Npars01 @sundogplanets I'm surprised that @EU_Commission hasn't started working out a mechanism to ban all products linked to him from import and use in Europe, given its experience of allowing such as him being in power. Moving all governments from Xitter to this system would be a useful step as it would move journalists too!
@sundogplanets No individual should have anywhere near that much control over the foreign policy of ANY country.
@sundogplanets I would consider moving to Mars because that would be very cool (and very hard), but I refuse to be under the rule of said awful billionaire.
@sundogplanets I say this every time. That dude is abusing ADHD meds.
@sundogplanets sounds like it's time to nationalize Starlink ☺️
@sundogplanets our governments give all sorts of common resources away for cheap.

@sundogplanets Why? Tax cuts. We decided when we scuttled the Space Shuttle that the future of space lay in corporate sponsorship instead of government investment. But with awesome power comes awesome responsibility, and we let billionaires be beholden to no one but their own egos.

I wanna know if we get to prosecute Melon Husk for treason in undermining an operation deemed gravely important to US national security?

@sundogplanets I wonder if Starlink could be nationalized?
@glennsills @sundogplanets Not an improvement given its international scope
@flippac @sundogplanets I agree, a better approach would be to "internationalize" it. This would be like having the UN take control of the international backbone. That idea is more whimsical than my original one.

@glennsills @sundogplanets Doesn't need to be nationalized because it's in the process of transferring to Morgan Stanley and Bank of America as a result of the financing of the Twitter buyout.

If Tesla stock drops too far, the banks will start taking possession of his assets. They're first in line during the firesale.

@[email protected] @sundogplanets But that just means that a banking consortium would oversee an international utility, and by extension, our national security policy. It would be better, since it is a good bet that they will be more mature than Musk, but not that much better. Their decisions will be based on profit, not on what is the right thing to do.

@glennsills @sundogplanets Yes, and that means their decisions will align with the national interest. They are mature capitalist enterprises which understand their dependence and allegiance to the capitalist state:! "l'État, c'est nous".

It might not be good for the subjects of the state, but that's a different standard.

@sundogplanets Global resource personnel decision

@sundogplanets

Thanks for the stark reality that news orgs ignore.

We have privatized infrastructure: from am/fm radio to cell phone towers (let the “market” decide which tech is best) to satellites and space launches (all Musk, all the time) because Rs in Congress, accelerating after Reagan, believe that “the market” can always “be better.”

Chicago School economists gave them that rhetoric, which legitimizes IMPERFECT markets that should be regulated. 🤦🏼‍♀️

The US gave up on anti-trust.

@sundogplanets

Can you share the breakdown on the other 45%?

@sundogplanets and with launches being super eco- unfriendly - essentially big fires- have humans ever left caves? - what did we achieve? Better coverage for Facebook videos?
@sundogplanets Everything that boosts the economy gets a go. Until the bitter end.
@sundogplanets I share your concern. Giving this to a fascist with a missile system. I don’t see it ending well.
@sundogplanets
Hopefully the now fully staffed #FCC can do something about the monopolization of low earth orbit.
Dr. Alexandre Santerne 🌍 (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image The #night #sky in 2023. This shocking #photography was obtained from #Montana (#USA) over 17 minutes. It reveals the crazy number of #satellites orbiting the #Earth. Most of them are #StarLink (from #SpaceX / #Musk) and aim at providing internet to some remote places. StarLink is not the only project for space-based #internet: there are also #Kuiper (#Amazon), #oneWeb, #Iris2 (@[email protected]), etc... which will send even more satellites into #space #Astronomy Credits: Matt C. Jackson

Astrodon - The Astro Community
@sundogplanets They live in the moment. Every single one of them.

Context for this @sundogplanets post

In Jan 2022, #SpaceX owned and operated 1,655 satellites (“more than a third of the total satellites in orbit”).
https://dewesoft.com/blog/every-satellite-orbiting-earth-and-who-owns-them

Aug 2023, NYT
SpaceX has “about 4,500” satellites. “So one company, I mean, one man, in fact, is responsible for 50 percent of the satellites in space”
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/09/podcasts/the-daily/elon-musk-starlink-space.html

“The company is the only U.S. entity currently able to send astronauts to orbit”
https://www.axios.com/2023/09/05/spacex-dominance-space-industry

#Musk

Every Satellite Orbiting Earth and Who Owns Them

Who owns our orbit? Read this article to learn which governments, organizations, and companies own and operate the most satellites orbiting our Earth.

Data Acquisition | Test and Measurement Solutions
@sundogplanets He’s definitely set aside the resources to clean up after himself when these reach the end of their service life, yes?
@sundogplanets what the actual fuck, really?!