lol cry more
lol cry more
Yes, but how much did we spend on pajamas?
The whole framing is lame. The money did not evaporate. It was spent somewhere else. Maybe journalist who are to lazy to investigate that thread deserve to be replaced by AI.
Ding ding ding! We have a winner. There is even a name for this....broken window economics
There has been so much space not leased for a long time, pre-covid.
They are just finally waking up to the fact that their is no demand when the landlords will not reduce price per square foot.
They thought they can hang in there, but there is no way. There are many buildings completely empty that have signs that say for lease.
The landlords are insane. Their overhead costs to maintain an empty building add up. They should just sell the building for cheap and get out of the hole.
@rodhilton "efficient, innovative workers lay off $800b in office space scoring big win for office worker industry"
"the space being made redundant is encouraged to refit for other industries"
Sigh....those saying that are falling into the broken window economics fallacy
Rich people have a way of making their financial problems everyone else's financial problems.
The economy is a web of interconnections.
Putting that aside, yes I am not sorry about it either.
I'm thinking of the gas saved, the pollution saved, better traffic, and the improved quality of life for many in not having to commute.
because......the economy is interconnected. Real estate value in office buildings dropping may result in you getting laid off, a recession, etc.
That being written, I am not shedding any tears, prying open my wallet, or writing a petition to go back to the office.
@David_Mitch_Sotelo @rodhilton
They diddn't. Corpos have had a grudge against work-from-home policies for a while.
Before the pandemic, the main argument was that wfh would decrease productivity, because people needed the exchange with colleagues and were too tempted to slack off at home. But then covid hit and productivity diddn't only fail to go down, it actually went up in some spaces.
So now that the pandemic is 'over', people who enjoy wfh are refusing to go back to the office, and want to keep working from home.
Since the pandemic also shifted (or made a shift visible in) the job market, from a market where employers had their pick of employees to the other way round, people can use this newfound power to bargain for wfh policies.
Office Space is usually not rented on a month-by-month basis, but likely 5 or even 10 years in advance. Meaning that office space that stays unused due to wfh policies still has to be paid for.
So from a pure monetairy perspective there is a lot of unused space, that costs corpos money without producing anything and landlords expect to see a drastic drop in demand in a few years, which makes both parties angry.
cont
@David_Mitch_Sotelo @rodhilton
Since large corporations and landlord associations have a lot of political power, they can use corporate friendly media to frame this as something the workers are doing to them out of bad intentions.
This headline frames the workers as cowardly or lazy, but other articles frame them as illoyal, greedy, spiteful etc.
If people with less power were to lose their investments or facing economical hardship, this would likely be framed as 'The free market working as intended', but it doesn't so it isn't.
The effect on the majority of people would be minimal, if the market was left to it's own devices as corpos keep suggesting. Though history shows that - at least in america - entities with a lot of power like big corps or banks will usually get handouts from the government.
@rodhilton that’s certainly one way to characterize the largest and most important advance in white-collar labor productivity in our lifetimes. Who the hell wrote that? Name and shame!
Office leases are deadweight loss. Pass it on.
@memory @rodhilton @sarahtaber I get the impression that a lot of the built environment is built with an implicit assumption that it's supposed to be there forever -- or at least that dealing with it in the future is someone else's problem -- rather than with a lifecycle in mind. Like, if we reduce the use of cars, what are we going to do with all this concrete and asphalt?
I'm feeling morbid today, but I'm also thinking there's too much childish refusal to think about death.
@rodhilton "you can't afford your own house? That's your fault making a bad investment"
"It's the workers who are responsible for this"
Idk sounds like they made a bad investment~
guess corporate real estate wasn't so stable after all