
I'm just going to tag:
#Mastodon #MastodonUX #MastodonDesign #MastodonServer #MastodonQuestions
For... no particular reason. :)
@davidaugust strong disagree.
People often spend years being taught to read, but I wouldn't say the UI of books is bad because of that; it's just not optimized for beginners. Once you become a proficient reader, it's often a more convenient and efficient way to access knowledge than many competing information retrieval systems.
There is a place in this world for interfaces optimized for expert use.
Pas mieux ! 👍
@davidaugust recommend reading https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/10/controlling-your-environment-makes-you-happy/
People only think UIs are "friendly" when they are the same as what they are used to.
It depends. Ux is related to user's background. In 21th century you are unable to use the first calculators because you have no reference to the https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulier
Same with displaying a "hard drive" icon. No baby would understand as he would never see it.
So the UX question is :
- what is the knowlege of the target user?
- target that knowledge.
Same choosing the appropriate language to speak to anybody.
@davidaugust I'm a UI/UX designer and I'd like to also add that it depends on the target demographic of the interface as well.
If you're making an advanced/technical tool, it's ok if the UX has to be explained to someone who's never used anything like it before, because your target demographic for designing the tool is already familiar with the UI conventions of that particular niche.
There's a balance between featurefulness and discoverability that can and has to be struck for each individual project.
Just saying this because some people think every UI has to be simple and minimalistic at the expense of usefulness, while others think that every UI has to be advanced and complicated at the expense of usability.
@hazelnot Jokes are also very dependent on the target demographic. A running gag in one audience might fall flat or in some instances even get you arrested in the other. Because one audience knows or is prepared to accept something that the other can't.
UI/UX of an MRI machine will probably need some explaining to a CNC mill operator.
So, still accurate.
@davidaugust Isn't that the case for basically anything new that one encounters?
Very few things other than doors & handles are that simple.
@davidaugust @Signez Makes for a great poster, but totally lacking nuance, therefore actually not true. See plane cockpits, video or music editors.
It's true for some user interfaces, but not all :-)
A user-interface-expected-to-be-used-successfully-seconds-after-being-seen-for-the-first-time is like a joke. If you have to explain it, it's not that good.
Closer to reality, but not a great poster!
"A computer should be like a pencil:
simple to use, and leaving the person in control."
Prof. Ben Shneiderman, founding director of the Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory at the University of Maryland, College Park
Also, if it's so easy even an idiot would be able to use it, only idiots will use it.
I don't remember the author.
@davidaugust My company's just introduced a new bespoke, online amends/approvals process that we've built. I got my first of the new emails yesterday: "Approval process complete!", the subject line excitedly read.
"Awesome", I thought. I can send that one to print, sign it off and archive the work.
"However, it would be unusual for this client to sign off on a v2".
Suspicious, I opened the email and scrolled down. Sure enough, below the fold, "Amends required."
Guess what my company does. 🙄