In-N-Out Burger bans employees from wearing masks unless they have a doctor's note
In-N-Out Burger bans employees from wearing masks unless they have a doctor's note
First time I’ve seen the interrobang in the wild in a while.
Excellent.
Don’t worry, Jesus will save you from the crippling diarrhea you might get because we require workers to come in sick and don’t let them cover their mouths.
And don’t worry, the dracula sneeze has been BANNED. Our employees let their snot spray proudly and free. No wicked vampire posturing at In-N-Out Burger.
Most people I know are only wearing masks now if they catch colds and flus and don’twant to spread it when going out and n public.
Which seems to me to be when you’d WANT your food service employee (whom you probably forced to work while sick) to wear one, so that they don’t spread it to the rest of your staff. But I guess I’m not a fast food company, corporate executive, so what do I know?
I guess some of us keep hoping that now that we exist in the future and have objective data, results, facts, etc that we can stipulate truth from lies/propaganda and the right thing.
I know, I know, I’ll see myself out.
The issue is that intelligent folk would prefer masks, but understand that is a lost cause and just have background radiation annoyance.
Whereas, conservatives will lose their god damned mind the moment they see the slightest bit of friction. And possibly go grab the gun from the back of their pickup truck.
Same, but that’s not realistic for most individuals in these industries that don’t have sick days, medical benefits, and/or a financial cushion to afford a day(s) lost income.
Wearing a mask to help reduce the spread of bacteria/viruses to your customers/fellow employees seems like the most basic human courtesy we should all want/expect.
These corporate overlords that force their personal politics (on either side) at work need to go.
Had to get some blood work done at the local hospital. Signage everywhere basically saying “You don’t have to wear a mask but you are really stupid if you aren’t wearing one in the waiting room or basically anywhere there are patients”. I was probably the only person in the entire building to have one on.
I am triple or quadruple vaccinated or whatever we are up to at this point. I’ve also managed to catch covid enough times from my (old) work that I am pretty confident I don’t have the long covid genes. So if I am going to be eating and drinking somewhere, I’ll not bother with a mask as I am screwed already. But if I am going to a store or watching a show or whatever? Wearing a mask costs me next to nothing (kn95s are pretty cheap) and means I don’t get convention flu anymore. And, honestly? It is nice if I forgot to shave this morning or whatever.
I don’t know a single person who wears a mask as a political statement. Even during the pandemic, it wasn’t common to think that way. People who wore them did it out of courtesy for those around them. I don’t imagine that has changed.
People who wear masks are usually wearing them because they don’t want to spread illness. Either they’re ill themselves or they have or know someone with an immunodeficiency that puts them at risk.
Yes. It is evident that this is more important than customer feelings when they don’t like masks.
So remember:
Personal choice here is not ok Virtue signaling is ok - as long as you are signaling virtues that agree with conservative feelings Feelings over facts
Also of note is the fact that the memo is addressed to employees in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Texas, and Utah. That leaves two states where In-N-Out operates — California and Oregon — that are apparently exempt from the mandate.
So does In n Out not care about customer service in California and Oregon? Or do they not care about safety in other states?
Just kidding. I know they don’t care about either. Luckily there’s a restaurant near me that has basically copied their recipes so I don’t have to worry about contributing to some regressive idiots.
Not a lawyer, but they’d be sticking their head into the teeth of California’s COVID-19 Prevention Non-Emergency Regulations. This batch took effect in February 2023 and are authorized for the next two years. Don’t know about Oregon.
From the Cal/OSHA Title 8 regulations:
§3205. COVID-19 Prevention. (f) Face coverings. (4) No employer shall prevent any employee from wearing a face covering, including a respirator, when not required by this section, unless it would create a safety hazard.
That's really messed up. It doesn't affect my experience as a customer and frankly I'd anything, it makes things better, because mask also blocks any droplets. So if employee even gets a cold I'm less likely to catch it too.
It should be treated like wearing a hair net.
If employee wants to wear it, it is hard for me do see any downside by letting them.
It depends what you look for in the budger. If you like a big portion, a lot of meat, then In n Out is not for you.
But a lot of people like burger created that way.
Right, be consistent and ban hairnets because employees wearing them reminds customers that their hair falls out. It's all about consistency! Lol
Gloves? Good as gone! How dare you insinuate that hands are unsanitary? Customers have those too, that's just rude!
See... this is the point at which the whole conservative covid reaction, to me, goes from just weird and unsettling to full-on bug-eyed insane. AND hypocritical.
Their whole deal with masks and vaccines is that they should have the right to decide for themselves. I think they make dumbass decisions that cause entirely avoidable harm, but okay - I can grant at least some bare semblace of legitimacy to self-determination. I don't vagree, but at least I can see their underlying logic.
But banning masks? What the actual fuck? What possible difference can it make in their lives that somebody else is wearing a mask? And what happened to their whole self-determination thing? Do they sincerely believe that nobody should be able to tell them whether or not they have to wear a madk and that they should be able to tell other people whether or not they can? How does that even work inside their brains? What possible logic leads to "I don't have to do what you say but you DO have to do what I say"?
Seriously, are they literally insane? I sincerely can't think of any other explanation. It's not just people acting in some way other than my preference, but people acting in a way that's blitheringly irrational, even by their own principles.
I suspect that when future historians write about this era, they're going to call it something like The Idiot Age, because to them it will be marked by people inexplicably doing obviously and painfully stupid and irrational things.