How Threads’ privacy policy compares to Twitter’s (and its rivals’)
Here’s what is collected by Threads, as well as by Twitter, Bluesky, Mastodon, Spill, and Hive Social.
How Threads’ privacy policy compares to Twitter’s (and its rivals’)
Here’s what is collected by Threads, as well as by Twitter, Bluesky, Mastodon, Spill, and Hive Social.
Also:
Is there something like a #JailBreak for older #Android or ##Apple phones where the #OS can be substituted with a securer #FOSS OS like #Linux?
This way, we would not have to need to buy new smartphones every other year due to forced #obsolescence by producers, or they could be recycled so more poorer people in the #GlobalSouth could finally participate in the #InternetRevolution helping to overcome the #DigitalDevide.
@michaelgemar That doesn’t really play; you may as well say that no software is trying to do anything because it’s not sentient.
Both ActivityPub and Mastodon were created with intent, and it’s well-documented that a big part of that intent was to offer an open alternative for Twitter and Facebook users. Pretending that it’s just some weird coincidence that Mastodon happens to lure away Twitter users is utterly asinine.
@rvcx Let’s try this: Can “Mastodon” the company ban Nazis from the network? Twitter and Threads have absolute control over who can use their network. “Mastodon” doesn’t (witness Gab, and various alt-right instances). There is no single centralized authority.
But at this point we may just be quibbling over terminology. I’m honestly no longer sure what the larger point is we’re arguing…
Well, if there's any advertising, it's word-of-mouth from existing users.
Probably worth noting that Mastodon ≠ Fediverse. It's a subset. Threads may become another subset.
Those looking at Threads… sure, dip your toe in the waters to see how it feels, but when you feel comfortable, come over and join us for the authentic experience.
@hs @arstechnica if you want to argue about all of this (waves hand at everything) then go for it, I’ll not participate.
My only point at this start was the disingenuous comparison you made. Opt-out vs the iOS App Store report card.
And I’m not defending either entity in their behaviour. It sucks for all involved.
Basically, they pull a Trump, put their hand down your pants and never let go.
@arstechnica @siracusa
I think this article's off!
Threads will not ask for permission, nor track, your phone's health, browsing history, or location data. It won't ask for access to your photos unless you upload a photo, and doesn't upload your photo library. It doesn't get access to your phone's contacts.
It does create a profile based on your actions within the app, incl loc via IP. Meta's profile on you is likely very granular. Tracking details as specific as pregnancy etc is concerning 😔
@arstechnica I'm not advocating for Threads at all.
I've heard RUMOR (that I cannot validate) that part of the reason why Threads captures so much data is to help combat fake/bot/abusive accounts via GPS and device ID.
If that is accurate, I don't disagree with that. But the privacy focused part of me is pretty strong.
@bespacific @arstechnica technically all fediverse apps should be showing that they collect all this information too.
it's not that the app ASKS for this information, but because you can post *anything* using the app, then the server you are using COULD store this information about you (and others).
The only thing I have specifically been asked for - is to allow notifications. It hasn't even asked for my location.