Today, two open letters from academics on the scientific arguments against the current #CSS (client side scanning) initiatives have been released:

* The first (in English, internationally coordinated) one is online at https://tinyurl.com/CSAScientistsLetter and still open for additional signatures.

* The second (in German, by #Austrian academics) one is online at https://www.ins.jku.at/chatcontrol/ and explicitly includes law experts in addition to the arguments from a security, privacy, and AI perspective.

This debate is expected to gain new steam with #Spain taking over the EU council presidency, given recently leaked statements like "Ideally, in our view, it would be desirable to legislatively prevent EU-based service providers from implementing end-to-end encryption" (https://www.wired.co.uk/article/europe-break-encryption-leaked-document-csa-law).

Please boost on any channels you deem adequate. The discussion is still open, and we have little time to bring it to a more rational level.

#csam #law #eu #privacy #dataprotection #privacy #humanrights #messenger #chat #chatcontrol #signal #whatsapp #telegram #threema #e2ee

One post on the same topic (split into 4 posts on the Twitter side, of course).

Twitter: 2.014 Follower, 1 Retweet, 3 Likes
Fediverse: 688 Followers, 72 Boosts, 44 Favourites

There really isn't a lot of motivation to go back to the other site at this point, is there?

@rene_mobile I find the academic walling "PhD or demonstrated research track record required" to be damaging elitism!

@rene_mobile Feine Sache, danke.

Nitpick: Das heißt nicht "sich gegenseitig" sondern "einander". :-)

@newstik Danke, Notiz wurde jetzt behoben (die war noch schnell hinzugefügt und nicht korrekturgelesen ;-) ).