If you like 🦋, you'll love this.

Quote: "We #sequenced 391 #genes from nearly 2,300 #butterfly species, sampled from 90 countries and 28 specimen collections, to reconstruct a new #phylogenomic tree of #butterflies representing 92% of all #genera."

OA 🔗: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02041-9

In order to #conserve #nature, we need to know what's out there and how #species are related to each other.

And have a look at one of the most (fittingly) #beautiful #phylogenetic trees you'll ever see👇🏼

#biodiversity

A global phylogeny of butterflies reveals their evolutionary history, ancestral hosts and biogeographic origins | Nature Ecology & Evolution

Butterflies are a diverse and charismatic insect group that are thought to have evolved with plants and dispersed throughout the world in response to key geological events. However, these hypotheses have not been extensively tested because a comprehensive phylogenetic framework and datasets for butterfly larval hosts and global distributions are lacking. We sequenced 391 genes from nearly 2,300 butterfly species, sampled from 90 countries and 28 specimen collections, to reconstruct a new phylogenomic tree of butterflies representing 92% of all genera. Our phylogeny has strong support for nearly all nodes and demonstrates that at least 36 butterfly tribes require reclassification. Divergence time analyses imply an origin ~100 million years ago for butterflies and indicate that all but one family were present before the K/Pg extinction event. We aggregated larval host datasets and global distribution records and found that butterflies are likely to have first fed on Fabaceae and originated in what is now the Americas. Soon after the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum, butterflies crossed Beringia and diversified in the Palaeotropics. Our results also reveal that most butterfly species are specialists that feed on only one larval host plant family. However, generalist butterflies that consume two or more plant families usually feed on closely related plants. A new phylogenomic tree for butterflies is constructed using 391 genes from 2,300 species, representing 92% of genera. It suggests that butterflies originated around 100 million years ago in what is now the Americas and originally fed on Fabaceae.

@dezene

Dated tree, to be precise.

One has to admire the sense for detail: the colours of the time scale match the official ICS chart.

Always wonder not only how species are related but how closely. As nice as dated trees are, they do not reflect the diversity in the used data, being ultrametrized. But no #phylogram in the otherwise information-rich supplement.

Also, should one really use political boundaries to define continental-scale bioprovinces (but see N. America)?

@dezene

PS #biogeography and DEC/BioGeoBears modelled ancestral area/migration analyses.

How do those political-fitted bioregions fit with the world at the time, let's say in the Cretaceous (Fig. S2 from the supplement)?

Palaeogeographic #FunFact: the shelf-to-shelf distance between Australia-New Guinea and what would become Malaya was > 3000 km in the Late Cretaceous, but already quite a busy butterflied route according to Fig. S2. Hopping from one tropical atoll to the next, maybe?

@dezene

Can't help it, sorry.

The Indo-part of Indomalaya was at the time even further away from Malaya but naturally closer to Australia although not really next to it.

Sophisticated top-down reconstructions look nice and make great graphics.

But whether they make sense might require a bit of a palaeo-perspective, too.

And, thanks to Rob Scotese, really everyone can dive into Earth's past.
#OldPosts https://researchinpeace.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-easter-egg-everyone-can-visually.html

The Easter Egg – everyone can (visually) dive into Earth's past

Introducing Robert Scotese's wonderful world of palaeoglobes, available also a GoogleEarth layers (kmz files) for selected time periods such as Miocene, K-T-boundary.

@grimmiges Really great analyses! Thanks so much. (And I hear you about political/ecological boundaries... Canadians and Americans in the northern tier(s) of States often deal with that issue... our separate maps abruptly cut off at the 49th.

@dezene

You're welcome.

Admittedly, it's a general problem in #Phylogenomics, blind reliance on data and models, the dei-ex-machina.

Few ponder the results out of the black-boxes.

In this case it would have been easy, definining bioregions that are coherent over time (India for instance) and then use the constraint options of the DEC model to eliminate impossible dispersal routes at a given time such as "Neotropics"-"Indomalaya"

But there seem to be too few researchers left in science.