Dear reporters, news people, etc.,

The reason you're not getting any reach on Masto is because you need to interact. You just come here, post your news article, and don't engage with the community.

You will never get reach if you don't interact with people. This is not Twitter. This is not Facebook. If you want this platform to work for you, you have to become a part of the community, not just shout at us and leave. Forget everything you learned in the walled corporate digital gardens.

@mrvapor I thought it would take a couple weeks for people to "get it", and as usual I was overly optimistic.
@Julian_Invictus @mrvapor My thoughts exactly. Some are quite new, for sure; people are still coming here. But some have been here a month -- not a long time, true, but long enough to have figured it out if they spent a few hours working on it.
@Julian_Invictus @mrvapor It's just like it was with my students. I taught them the same stuff year after year, and every year, they were just as ignorant when coming to my class 😏
@Julian_Invictus @mrvapor maybe with the ability to follow hashtags now more or less everywhere here, that will change as people find it easier to connect
@mrvapor At least they will still interact with each other on Post. ;-)
@KansasGrant @mrvapor I am still waiting to have access to Post. Uhhh, probably not going to be a presence there since it is clearly inferior.
@CathieEnglish @KansasGrant @mrvapor I got into Post very early - there's no there, there. It's anti-social media.
@KansasGrant @mrvapor
…effin Post 🙄
@fungible_thadius @KansasGrant @mrvapor more like f*ck post. Hard pass.
Rich Felker (@[email protected])

@[email protected] @[email protected] Post has EXACTLY the same goal as Elon has with Twitter, just more tact about how to do it: Undoing the democratization of the flow of information and herding journalists into a bubble that billionaires control. Post is just making them feel like VIPs rather than bombarding them with nazis.

Hachyderm.io
@dalias @talia_christine @fungible_thadius @KansasGrant @mrvapor After reading a bit, I somehow feel lucky to have been living under a rock for a while xD
@mrvapor
Journalists have a difficult line to walk between professional presenation and personal interactions. They need to be able to present their information and need our support whether they interact or not.
@mrvapor agree. Mastodon is not Twitter (thank goodness).

@gbhnews @mrvapor

Mastodon is literally a direct replacement/competitor to Twitter.

Why would things be different here? And why on Earth do you need your news sources to "interact" with you before you take them seriously?

There are 8 billion people on the planet, news sources have to be ready to interact with each and every person?

@BeegyPsi @gbhnews @mrvapor I’m struggling with this bias as well. Writers write news. I read news. That’s the relationship.

@BeegyPsi @gbhnews @mrvapor

Mastadon is not a competitor to Twitter. It's an alternative. It was designed with different goals in mind than Twitter was, and as such, functions differently. On Twitter, you had an algorithm that boosted certain posts/users (like verified news orgs, for example) into people's timelines. Here, the only way you get people's eyes on you is to get them to follow you and for them to boost you to others that follow them. It's slower and more organic. Ie. different.

@BeegyPsi @gbhnews @mrvapor

Mastodon is literally a direct replacement/competitor to Twitter.lol, lmao

@gbhnews @mrvapor
GBH is doin' it right, FWIW.
Your daily posts are informative and interesting and fun, and you all answer questions and respond to commentary.
It doesn't hurt that you're my local station, either. ;)
@mrvapor so many of them will synchronize and be shocked that people aren't following their confusing, impossible to follow threads here.

@mrvapor

Exactly this - I noticed a lot of creative types posting their work and thirsting for interaction but getting none as well because their posts are often times very self absorbed.

Things aren't algorithmic here. Likes aren't begatting more likes on the level it does on the birdsite. Interesting dialogue, however, leads to retooting and notable exposure a larger community and a better overall experience.

Talk with the community, not at the community.

@multiverseofbadness @mrvapor this is exactly why the learning curve matters. Getting back to my creative types wearing a million of their own hats example, just the management of social media takes hours (if you have a calendar, follow a schedule, etc etc) and so much of those platforms force so much removal of anything dripping of pathos you are almost trained to be a bot. A whole lot of thevartists we work with are managing their own FB, IG, Twit, TikTok, YouTube, etc etc etc. They are doing that after their full-time job and before their gig that week. A lot of it becomes about priorities, and then.... taking the time to learn each platform and deciding its value and your investment.

@multiverseofbadness @mrvapor

I suspect the quality of their work could also improve once they change gears.

My #writing has gone up a notch in the month since I've moved to Masto. I can't put my finger on how or why but it's noticeable.

@Jollyspaniard @mrvapor

I'm not sure why but #Mastodon feels.. different; more like and old #BBS or #Usenet from back in the days

I have met a lot of people.on #Twitter but solely through #podcasting; not sure I've had more than a quick Giphy response from other person over there not podcast adjacent. Maybe that's a testament to be bring boring... 😂 But once I reached about 100+ follows / followers on #Masto I've felt oddly right and home and talkative

@Jollyspaniard @multiverseofbadness @mrvapor this feels so true! my work has definitely improved since getting off of Instagram for I think two reasons:
I don't constantly feel horrible about myself for not having followers, not having the most "aesthetic" feed, and for not being a brand
I spend overall less time on here

Plus speaking to people in a human way gets me excited about sharing things with them
Dunno if this is everyone's experience but it's a good thing

@siin @Jollyspaniard @multiverseofbadness @mrvapor - I have been here for many years so I simply don't have anything to compare it to. I was 2 weeks on Twitter and had to leave, and with that all my dreams of expanding my audience beyond these villages). But it does give you some closer relationships with your readers. I have had people visit me here in Copenhagen from Canada, Norway, Sweden Germany, UK etc.

@siin @multiverseofbadness @mrvapor

I'm not sure I can define it either. I'm more proactive and expressive here, less guarded and fearful. I'm also more proactive, not reactive. I also spend less time scrolling on masto than I did on Twitter.

I've also had some good craft discussions with other writers and game developers on mastodon that have helped me develop.

@Jollyspaniard @multiverseofbadness @mrvapor yes to all of this. It's very important to have these collaborative communities. Personally, I know they need to exist face to face, but I see no reason why we can't enjoy them online as well. Especially since there are people from all over here, with varied perspectives and ways of doing things we can share
@mrvapor Thank you for the reminder. This is such a great community. I’m slowly getting the hang of it. This is so much better than the toxic bird site! #MastodonRules
@mrvapor in contrast, when I go Post News all I see is reporter posts. Never real people. It’s one reason I keep coming back here.
@Bsharwood @mrvapor there is only one person from Twitter I would? Will? Join Post for when my number comes up in the backlog. A copy editor/author, he fits there. That's it, though.
@mrvapor Ironically, this has always been true of twitter too. I think the real reason why some people are unhappy is that they don't have a pre-made audience.
@mrvapor Ohhhh SUCH a perfect post!
@mrvapor I agree and it remains to be seen if they will ever get this. This is one of the reasons why some journalists are having such a difficult time untangling themselves from Twitter. That site acted like a megaphone and communication tool amongst elites, not a true form of public engagement.

@mrvapor @jeffjarvis I fundamentally disagree with this. The reason is that there just aren't a lot of "news junkies" on Mastodon to interact with them. That's it. Mastodon users are more focused on the latest Arch distro, anarchism, and pixel art.

"This is not Twitter and this is not Facebook" is just an observation about the current demographic of the Fediverse, not about any intrinsic difference between the mechanisms of interaction.

@jsit @mrvapor @jeffjarvis I disagree; I am personally not interested in any of those examples. I certainly do not expect, nor want, anything birdlike in terms of one-sided verbal discharge, but I do appreciate news - world news- and other current-focused info.
@mrvapor Me, thinking of that one guy who goes viral on Twitter pretty much every day for asking basic music fan questions but never replies to anyone who chimes in on the Tweets.
@mrvapor so why is interaction necessary? Is it because of the culture, or is there a structural reason behind it?
@mrvapor yes one of the things I like best here is that it is so much easier to talk to people.... Twitter seemed to encourage a stand-offish approach for some reason in many minds.
@mrvapor
Speaking for myself, and not to discount the original point, I appreciate basic posts of news articles. I would be disappointed if journalists stopped doing that because they felt it was unwelcome.
@mrvapor true and so funny in the same time!
@mrvapor This place is 100% what we make it! It's harder to lurk here, at least if you want things to be interesting
@mrvapor
Let's look at the numbers.
237 million daily active users (41.5 million in US) on Twitter and a little more than 8 million total unique users in the Fediverse.
The reach here is simple on a different scale. Interaction makes little difference.
@mrvapor The Press have a big problem with interaction. While Stephanie Rhule does interact, Joy Reid does not (unless you’re famous), and Maddow never.
Of large non Press accounts Malcolm Nance, Sandi Bachom, José Andres all interact regularly - Judas even Mark Hamill interacts with people. It’s not entirely the Press’s fault as Jack Dorsey did little to stop bots & elmo let’s them swarm.
@mrvapor not sure I agree. Think it’s okay to have both. I like these platforms alfor news and special interests. But I would not normally interact with news for privacy concerns.
@mrvapor That was true in the early days of Twitter as well ... before Oprah joined and other celebrities followed.

@mrvapor

Strong disagree.

Mastodon needs news and current events more than they need Mastodon.

And in all the replies I've made in Twitter, I don't recall any interaction coming from replies by the OP when OP was a major news agency. That wasn't a hindrance to adoption there, and it shouldn't be here.

@mrvapor Hear hear! To those who are saying that Mastodon will never attract the mass of people who are on Twitter, I say, "Good!" Mastodon is more my kind of platform because it is not such a centralized corporate space.

@mrvapor

I totally agree with that. This is a different type of place, a different type of culture. I've never felt more alive on a social network than when I arrived here eons, like forever ago (checks watch...2 weeks ago!)

@mrvapor I agree … to an extent. I have 2 mastodon accounts and one is on the all-reaching journa.host. I do engage on both and arguably I even do so more there but it’s on this account I get on more people’s radar. It’s weird really. I think it’s a difference if servers and their popular time zones.

@mrvapor and especially don't just post to twitter and then leave a pointer here thinking we're gonna go to twitter to read what you have.

Might as well just point to my secret notes that I keep in the garbage bin. I might even get more engagement on those secret note posts ...

@mrvapor Here for this criticism.

@mrvapor WHAT?!? jk

What you advise worked on the bird site as well. It’s always better to interact!

@mrvapor Excellent, thank you, and you have sparked a really interesting and important discussion