Ahahahaha.
Me: Here’s a thing I do for my mental health.
Rando: Don’t do that.
Me: *block*
(I also block for my mental health.)
Note that I started the original post by saying “this says more about me” and “at this point in my life.” There was a time when being Right online meant a lot to me. That time has passed. Hell, I’m not sure I care about being right in person anymore.
It may happen to you, too. When the time comes, try to enjoy it. It’s very liberating to let online strangers exist in their wrongness.
Today a woman came up to me in a parking lot after I parked my truck. She wanted to know if I still believed the bumper sticker on my tailgate that says "patriotic Americans get vaccinated." I warily said yes. She started on an anti-vaxxer rant.
I could have had a fight with this woman. I could have tried to change her mind. I could have done a lot of things.
I just said "oh, no thank you" and walked away.
Sometimes denying someone your attention is the only thing you need to do.
@fraying Honestly, same.
Though I might have wished her the day she deserved before I walked off.
I am far more interested in finding moments to be kind to strangers in the wild than wasting energy on bullies and ignoramuses who will never learn anyway, and just want to suck away my sweet, sweet mental juices.
@fraying Depriving randos of your time and attention (their oxygen) is very effective self-defense. Sometimes it's even satisfying.
Here's to better days ahead.
@fraying I think that is a good use of your time and energy.
I, for one, find what your words here useful and inspiring so it's not like you're doing nothing.
¡FUERZA! !
.
@fraying
When I was 25, a friend wrote to me:
"The best defense is usually to lose. It takes years for people like me and you who were trained to win to learn this."
I was in my 40s before I could understand and internalize that lesson. It remains one of the most valuable things anyone's ever said to me.
@slcw someone said that for their own personal mental health at this stage of their life, they find it better to disengage than have a public argument with someone.
You responded to that they should not do this for their own well-being, because it will essentially turn them MAGA.
I actually do feel this kind of reply is part of mastodon's culture. I'm not really a fan.
@fraying My approach is both less and more hair-trigger than that. If I'm replying to disagree, that's fine. If I'm rolling my eyes while hitting reply and thinking "*this* fuckin' idiot" then instead I block rather than unfollow.
Perfect example, that person who replied "but but echo chamber"? *Bllllllllllock.*
Once upon a time, when the Internet was only an egg, I took debating seriously and enjoyed it. I had collected extensive reference files and bookmarks for specific topics, and could also argue from authority and experience in most of them.
This enjoyment mostly persisted through the BBS, Usenet, IRC, G+, and Reddit eras. However, the bigger the potential audience, the more obvious it became that the discussions were becoming pig-wrestling exercises at best. Too much polarization, too many trolls and shit-posters.
COVID-19 finally killed the last traces of any desire to be publicly correct. After a public health post with lots of credible references (in a small, tightly policed and curated Reddit-clone forum) got brigaded by loud deniers, I was done.
/1
Allowing bad faith discourse to dominate is terrible for everyone. There's plenty of evidence of deliberate efforts to exhaust and demoralize the reality-based community... And in my case, they've won. But the Internet isn't the world, and there are other, arguably more effective means of carrying on the fight.
/2
@fraying Most of my Mastodon feed and replies are lovely. Of course, there will be exceptions. Any time I'm tempted to argue with someone, I just unfollow and/or block them instead.
Friendly disagreements about silly stuff (pineapple pizza, for example) are diversions; someone thinking social media doesn't need moderation is something else entirely.