the framing of mastodon having attrition problems bafflingly misses what's interesting here

mastodon's new user retention rate being as high as it is, despite there being no UX team designing shady psychological tricks into the service/apps to keep you coming back, is a pretty big deal

like, let's be honest, there's very little about mastodon that's making us want to return here compulsively or addictively the way so many for-profit services implicitly aim for

it's pretty much just the people

i think, if anything at all, we should be looking at this as the marginal difference between toxic user experience design and healthier approaches and mindsets about use. and how small that gap is.

it's like taking massive amounts of anabolic steroids and other performance enhancing drugs for years, and then realizing it only gave you a tiny bump in performance. like... sure, it effected a statistically significant difference, but could we POSSIBLY justify the amount money we spent on drugs?

@ali also it’s not actually a commercial enterprise so at some level who cares what the monthly active user rate is

@sam @ali "...who cares...?"

People who value the effects on society this is supposed to have.

@dalias @ali of course it matters that people use fediverse tools and find value in them but the traditional focus on monthly active users in the private sector is because it’s more or less directly coupled to revenue and thus ability to continue operating. Being run almost entirely by volunteers the fediverse doesn’t have this problem and therefore short term fluctuations in usage just aren’t as important as people are accustomed to when observing commercial social media
@ali And that's a good thing.
@ali
Is it a competition?
This framing is odd in itself.
I mostly left Twitter to switch to Mastodon and had already been using Mastodon from time to time, before that.
I use it less than I used to use Twitter, but I am not disappointed about it. It's fine.
@ali this is such a great point!

@ali
Mastodon look and feel is based on Twitter and it might have accidentally copied some of their shady tricks.

But people are great anyway.l!

@ali all I know is, nearly every time I post something different, seemingly down to earth humans reply. Compared to #twitter in which rarely would I get a response, even from friends. #Mastodon is being used by actual people. Twitter is used by a few to post, and everyone else to listen/watch a daily train wreck.
@boiglenoight @ali and so many people have been trained to lurk rather than engage. We went from conversational media to "social media" that is really just about one-sided posting of attention seekers trying to get likes.
@darwinwoodka @ali yup. Something great about Mastodon is that if you ask a question you’re likely to get an answer. Something more meaningful than #Google or #chatgpt
@boiglenoight @darwinwoodka @ali
Yes! An answer based on a real human being's experience. And I've (so far at least) never been belittled for not knowing the answer.

@ali
It's the people. Just that.

I say this as someone with a patchy social media history... Meaning I hate that shit unless it's FOSS. All in on #diaspora back in the day, but #NeverTwitter, never a #Qwitter ... That shit was noise and embedded links on real news sites for me. Usually ignored, because it's Twitter, and that devalues the opinion and makes me question whether it's really "news".

I don't trust corporate social media. Period.

@ali
Twitter was ALWAYS a shitstain nothingburger to me. I subtracted 75% credibility if I saw "news" there. Now I subtract 100%.

If it's a Tweet, it's a lie. Unless otherwise substantiated by a genuinely reliable source, it's a lie. Even if I normally trust you, I don't trust you on Twitter or Facebook.

Period.

#diaspora #nevertwitter #qwitter

@ali

I find being on this platform very relaxing, the opposite of twitter. I spend less time on here, but enjoy it far more.

It actually doesn't matter how many people are joining or leaving various instances, because it's not run for profit, no one's getting fat off trying to get you to stay.

Our society has so few ways of measuring success, other than wealth/greed or status/power, so I suspect that this is what is happening in the media, simply put, they just don't understand what is happening unless it's in terms of something/someone beating someone/something else, or someone getting rich off the backs of exploiting others.

Sad, but this is the world we live in.

@ali The difference (and in this instance, the problem) with Mastodon is that you have to build your own positive experience here, and before that, you have to figure out HOW to build your own positive experience. I only started to really enjoy it when I started looking at that building process as an open-world game. I do which there was a better way to jump-start that user experience though. I suspect a lot of people never get as far as finding and signing up with an instance.
@ali For the way I use it, it doesn't matter for other reasons. In my mind, a blog post has to be well thought & presented well. It took me a long time & so didn't post often. Now I just have to compose like telegraph style. Just like blogs, there is no req that reader's have to be in this nwk I could be the only person, in which case it is like my blog. It so happens, the engagement is better than for my blog. The only thing I will ask for the ability to move posts between instances.
@ali
It really is the people. I get far more engagement here, and no trolls or hate speech. It's far less performative and much more thoughtful.

@ali

This.

But tbf, Mastodon et. al. probably *do* incorporate elements of Twitter's UX just by osmosis. Everyone knows Twitter's UI so well that they naturally clone elements of it just because it seems like the obvious thing to do.

@ali Indeed this is awesome, but TBF what Twitter was, and what Twitter is now, are driving a lot of the underlying motivation for folks to engage on this kind of medium (microblog). I think we'd have a really hard time convincing people of the value of that without the precedent and critical mass of people with the habit.
@ali the value of any of these platforms resides in the people using them; this was always true of FB and Twitter, too, except they needed the tricks to bring people in in the first place.

@ali the problem I see is lack of sufficient critical mass. Only some of my friends are on Mastodon and I am a bleeding edge adopter for tech.

The mistake here is to see these processes in a fatalistic way as if nothing can change them. The Web didn't just happen because everyone thought it was great, we spent a great deal of time thinking about adoption strategy.

Whitehouse.gov didn't just happen, we pushed Gore's people to look at the Web as the means of delivering his Information Superhighway. And we did that because I had seen how the IBM PC legitimized the micro-computer.

We have to look at how to extend Mastodon and make it 'sticky'. One way to do that in my view is functionality that integrates legacy Web Forums into the Fediverse so that we get the Facebook groups type functionality.

I am on a half dozen Facebook robot building groups (yes, the dalek in my avatar is one I built). I would much rather they moved to a different site so I don't get banned for 30 days for mentioning someone once made an actual musical of 'springtime for hitler' again.

If there was a Mastodon robot building interest group and prop builders were there, I would be there and so would most folk in the community. While there are people who only build daleks, most serious folk will build a dalek and then maybe R2 and then maybe a Robby or a B9.

There is a distinct community but it is fragmented across a dozen different forums and some (e.g Dewback Wing) seem to have gone. And none of them are really much good for structured discussion.

@ali maybe it’s the gigantic marketing spend. I mean, c’mon, that was an insane SuperbOwl commercial!
@ali No algorithm or automated notifications to try and drag you back into their walled gardens and advertisers. It’s Facebook, Instagram and Twitters nightmare
@ali Which is why it’s so much gun and far more interesting ….. interesting discussions and info too!!!!

@ali This angle about addictive aspects being "baked in by design" is emerging as critical in understanding this digital scourge of our times, and something that very few people appear to consciously care about because they can't wean themselves off of the associated dopamine rush.

In that sense there is something very Darwinian about such predatory behavior by social networks on unsuspecting users with low self-awareness but historically that's how 'the carrot and the stick' has always worked.

@ali in 2008 Twitter was useful and interesting, now, for me at least it's much like a live feed window into a growing dystopian world.
@ali what next, mastodon having monetizability problems
@ali @fulanigirl and for me, it’s been fine. My TL here is about as lively as it was on Twitter, and covers about the same niches.

@ali could a chunk of that be people creating accounts on one of the '"bigger" servers then moving to a self hosted or smaller server.

Are all severs counted in these numbers?

@ali

I really like this take, for a number of reasons. The least important is that the last line reminds me of Soylent Green.

But I digress.

I noticed a number of commentors using the phrase, "Twitter is shooting itself in the foot." Yes, and the users have made a great pastime of shooting each other in the feet.

I didn't come here from Twitter. I don't know much about the gestalt or the weltanschauung here, but I know what I like. I like here.

@ali @tchambers I come here for the people, not the algorithms. Give me real dialog every time.
@ali I have been a slow adopter of mastodon but Twitter has mostly lost me even though I was deeply invested in it just a few months ago. Yet increasingly I check in with mastodon instead of Twitter when I'm looking for a news fix.
@ali
People are addictive. That's the core of social media.

@ali I sailed away from Twitter last November. Don't have as much to now fight about but do find a wide range of very interesting comments, ideas, art, politics, etc.

That gives me the opportunity to make a half assed intelligent response.

More importantly it makes me think more in depth about the issues I am exposed to.

A fair wind and a following sea to my fellow Mastodonians.

@ali Another way of looking at it is that all those algorithms were wasted effort. We're proof that we'll just hang out and scroll without them.
@ali Also almost every journalists misses what moving instances means for 'new user' count. The focus on 'inactive users' when most of them are just moved to a different instance (so the old instance user *looks* inactive).