ChatGPT will replace those news story generators and middle management long before they'll replace me swapping a moto clutch or designing automation.
Technically the bosses job is already replaced with ‘workflow’ and ‘automated-approvals’ 🥳
@film_girl @SwiftOnSecurity Wait, you use one #OpenAI #GPT3-based product to instruct people how to use another #GPT3 product?
So you’re working yourself out of a job teaching others how to work themselves out of their jobs?
@SwiftOnSecurity they’ve already replaced the managers!
Ask the chat bot how to make more money at a company with too many employees and it’ll tell you less employees!
Loaded questions? No, AI responses, ML predictions, graphs!
@shellmanac @SwiftOnSecurity Honestly, that’s what I find most interesting - that we’re systematically committed to exacerbating class structure through automation than benefitting everyone.
Our wake up call should have been people accepting the Harry Potter universe. Perfect automation yet there are still poor Wizards.
@JoeUchill @SwiftOnSecurity the Harry Potter universe as a dystopia is one of my favourite topics to unpack.
JKR: You can do almost literally ANYTHING with magic, my dude. I'm talking teleportation, time travel, mind control, effortless torture, the perfect murder, you name it!!
Us: Eradicating food insecurity?
JKR: No no, THAT one's unethical
They seem to make idiotic decisions, and usually they're not inconvenienced by the decisions they make.
Welp, an AI probably woudn't do massive layoffs, because they're historically bad for the businesses that do them.
https://news.stanford.edu/2022/12/05/explains-recent-tech-layoffs-worried/
As layoffs in the tech sector mount, Stanford Graduate School of Business Professor Jeffrey Pfeffer is worried. Research – by him, and others – has shown that the stress layoffs create takes a devastating toll on behavioral and physical health and increases mortality and morbidity substantially. Layoffs literally kill people, he said.
Honestly do management know how little they matter?
I have worked places where people get laid off for "business reasons" but it's always low level people first, when they could save the same salary cost laying off 1/2 as many middle managers, & retain the people who actually do the work.
But if you lay off middle management, upper management would have no one to do their jobs for them.
I have heard of a company using ai as a middle manager. It turned out to be the best middle manager they'd ever had.
Guess ChatGPT will be eminently able to spout management speak.