There's some embedded cultural commentary on the fact news stories are asking if ChatGPT will replace your job instead of your boss's job.
@SwiftOnSecurity
I always wondered why they don't outsource CEO positions. I'm sure a company could save millions just by moving one job.
@helmsinepu @SwiftOnSecurity Because CEOs have to make some of the most nuanced decisions with the most limited information of anyone in the company. The fortunes of the CEO should be aligned with the fortunes of the company. Who wants a temp CEO?

@alexjackson @SwiftOnSecurity

They seem to make idiotic decisions, and usually they're not inconvenienced by the decisions they make.

@helmsinepu @SwiftOnSecurity Sure, you can point to idiotic decisions made by CEOs. But would an outsourced CEO be better? What do we even mean by this? An agency CEO? It's almost a contradiction in terms.

@alexjackson @SwiftOnSecurity

Welp, an AI probably woudn't do massive layoffs, because they're historically bad for the businesses that do them.

https://news.stanford.edu/2022/12/05/explains-recent-tech-layoffs-worried/

What explains recent tech layoffs, and why should we be worried? | Stanford News

As layoffs in the tech sector mount, Stanford Graduate School of Business Professor Jeffrey Pfeffer is worried. Research – by him, and others – has shown that the stress layoffs create takes a devastating toll on behavioral and physical health and increases mortality and morbidity substantially. Layoffs literally kill people, he said.

Stanford News