@stevenodb @PavelASamsonov @andrewfeeney

Unless ChatGPT can cite every single sources that it got its information on, it's pretty much useless.

However, that has already been the problem of writings (especially Medium) on the Internet for the past two decades. Very few writers care about citing research and evidences to back up their points anymore.

@stevenodb @andrewfeeney i used to tell people that if you say random stuff without regards to its truth with a straight enough face that people will believe you. I just call it messing with people.

for instance, i had people going for years with the thought "have you ever laid in bed, trying to sleep, and your body just jerks? That's your body dumping useless information- that's why you can't remember some stuff the next day"

AND THEY BOUGHT IT

@stevenodb @andrewfeeney

@OCRbot

@stevenodb @andrewfeeney

Just like in human communication one is responsible to let the other party know ones level of expertise.
If one appends "Explain like i am five.", "Explain like i took a course on that in university but i need an refresher" or something similar one can tune the kind of response.

Prompt tuning is a thing and it is frankly annoying that the same crowd both dismisses results achieved by prompt tuning, that prompt tuning is a skill and complain

@stevenodb @andrewfeeney

OH MY GOODNESS!

@stevenodb @andrewfeeney I just wrote about ChatGPS quoting the line that it is the world's ultimate bullshit artist.

"Mansplaining as a service" is even better.

@stevenodb @andrewfeeney

Amazing how far people will go to be mean.