After two decades of energy analysis & punditry, I conclude that most readers & listeners are attracted to technology stories, because they feel like they understand them. So we have hype cycles around fracking, hydrogen, nukes, etc.

But the things that actually matter--where the real #energytransition happens--are not technology stories at all! They're process and regulation and legislative stories... that bore our tech-obsessed audiences.

It's a real conundrum.

@chrisnelder This is an excellent observation. I direct a group of 7 #engineers and 3-4 #policy analysis, working on #EV, #V2G and #electricitypolicy. Biweekly meetings. Two of us mostly get both worlds, others listen & realize the other side enabes them (partial solution), but don’t fully understand how. I’d say it’s not just interest/boredom, but two cultures & languages. Also per @Kmac many US electricity challenges are state jurisdiction; so we have to fight trench warfare in 50 oblasts.

@willett @chrisnelder

this is true, but there are systemic tools that can be a huge benefit in all jurisdictions. expanding foia/open records laws to regulated IOUs and pushsing harder on agencies already subject to same for broader data access would be monumental.

utilizing that data with accessible planning tools like GenX https://energy.mit.edu/genx/, Calliope https://www.callio.pe/, and Engage (Calliope UI) https://engage.nrel.gov/en/login/?next=/en/ would be a force multiplier.

GenX

@willett @chrisnelder

...and imagine if regulated utilities and Munis all used accessible planning tools? everyone working with a single truth would be priceless (especially on the scale of plexos license fees).

@willett @chrisnelder excuse the irony if i twisted Chris' excellent observation back to tech...