On Mastodon, there's two groups of people:
1. Those who want to recreate Twitter
2. Those who want to bury Twitter, then pave over its grave
I'm of the second group.
On Mastodon, there's two groups of people:
1. Those who want to recreate Twitter
2. Those who want to bury Twitter, then pave over its grave
I'm of the second group.
Let me go further: my problem with Twitter isn't Elon Musk.
Elon Musk is just taking Twitter to its logical conclusion.
No, my problem with Twitter is that it's centralized social media that funds itself through surveillance capitalism.
And THAT is why Twitter needs to be dead and buried.
And Twitter isn't alone in my contempt.
The following social media needs to be dead and buried too:
* Facebook
* WhatsApp
* Instagram
* TikTok
* YouTube
All of them are awful.
All of them need to die.
i'm in neither group. I think Mastodon is useful and interesting, but it isn't Twitter.
I'm also hanging in there for Twitter, it's too valuable to let it go without some kind of effort to preserve what it is.
@davew I used to be a big believer in Twitter. I even helped build the #1 3rd party Twitter app. In fact, Twitter has benefited me materially in many ways.
However, after witnessing the ugly side of Twitter last March—specifically, how it can be used to harass people with inconvenient narratives—I resolved to work towards its demise.
As far as I'm concerned, the only benefit of Twitter is as an archive of past data. But even that has problems.
I don't have any hope for Twitter as long as Elon owns it.
Talking Heads, "nothing but flowers"?
Just imagine the #Internet would 'belong' to someone....
With this in mind, I think it is pretty obvious that decentralized, #federated systems are stronger, fairer and more sustainable than #centralized dictatorships...
@atomicpoet
As am I, Chris. I've remained silent thru the debates & outright arguments re:QTs, but I unequivocally believe it's truly crass & unproductive to come here, where people have been & are working so hard, many at their own expense, & start demanding changes.
I personally have no problems with how this platform runs, and have been happy to just settle in, look around, listen & learn. It operates similarly enough to be easy to use. I've no complaints, or need for it to be twitter.
@seanm4c Or, another possibility: as Mastodon grows, it splinters into tiny communities that DON'T scale into one giant userbase.
In fact, that's already happening.
@seanm4c Those communities exist. We just don't see them right now.
It is entirely possible that there will be a proxy arms race to disrupt de-federation. We'll see.
@reselsnark @atomicpoet I am willing to wager that most people on Mastodon would not want to associate themselves with either of these positions.
Making deliberately provocative posts to get engagement is very Twitterish behavior. It worked, I replied. Is that a technological problem or a people problem?
@stpaultim @reselsnark @atomicpoet
Even over there I would have preferred 100 followers with > 50% engagement, rather than 1m followers and nary a reponse, just "likes".
I tried offering discussion points, usually to crickets.
I never deigned to use "who thinks popular idea of the day" posts.
So... i say it's a people problem.
Don't follow me if you're never going to engage beyond an agreement button.