40 years ago, giant entertainment companies embarked on a slow-moving act of arson. The fuel for this arson was #copyright #TermExtension (making copyrights last longer), including *retrospective* copyright term extensions that took works out of the #PublicDomain and put them back into copyright for decades. Vast swathes of culture became off-limits, pseudo-property with absentee landlords, with much of it crumbling into dust.

1/

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/12/20/free-for-2023/#oy-canada

2/

Pluralistic: 2023’s public domain is a banger (20 Dec 2022) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

After 55-75 years, only 2% of works have any commercial value. After 75 years, it declines further. No wonder that so much of our cultural heritage is now #OrphanWorks, with no known proprietor. Extending copyright on all works - not just those whose proprietors sought out extensions - incinerated whole libraries full of works, permanently.

3/

But on January 1, 2019, the bonfire was extinguished. That was the day that items created in 1923 entered the US public domain: DeMille's *Ten Commandments*, Chaplain's *Pilgrim*, Burroughs' *Tarzan and the Golden Lion*, Woolf's *Jacob's Room*, Coward's "London Calling" and 1,000+ more works:

https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2019/

4/

Public Domain Day 2019 | Duke University School of Law

January 1, 2019 is (finally) Public Domain Day: Works from 1923 are open to all!

Many of those newly liberated works were forgotten, partly due to their great age, but also because no one knew who they belonged to (Congress abolished the requirement to register copyrights in 1976), so no one could revive or reissue them while they were still in the popular imagination, depriving them of new leases on life.

5/

2019 was the starting gun on a new public domain, giving the public new treasures to share and enjoy, and giving the long-dead creators of the Roaring Twenties a new chance at posterity. Each new year since has seen a richer, more full public domain. 2021 was a *great* year, featuring some DuBois, Dos Pasos, Huxley, Duke Ellington, Fats Waller, Bessie Smith and Sydney Bechet:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/12/16/fraught-superpowers/#public-domain-day

6/

Pluralistic: 16 Dec 2020 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

In just 12 days, the public domain will welcome another year's worth of works back into our shared commons. As ever, Jennifer Jenkins of #Duke's Center for the Public Domain have painstaking researched highlights from the coming year's entrants:

https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2023/

7/

Public Domain Day 2023 | Duke University School of Law

Tweet       By Jennifer Jenkins, Director of Duke’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain January 1, 2023 is Public Domain Day: Works from 1927 are open to all! On January 1, 2023, copyrighted works from 1927 will enter the US public domain. 1  They will be free for all to copy, share, and build upon. These include Virginia Woolf’s To The Lighthouse and the final Sherlock Holmes stories by Arthur Conan Doyle, the German science-fiction film Metropolis and Alfred Hitchcock’s first thriller, compositions by Louis Armstrong and Fats Waller, and a novelty song about ice cream.

On the literary front, we have Virginia Woolf's *To The Lighthouse*, AA Milne's *Now We Are Six*, Hemingway's *Men Without Women*, Faulkner's *Mosquitoes*, Christie's *The Big Four*, Wharton's *Twilight Sleep*, Hesse's *Steppenwolf* (in German), Kafka's *Amerika* (in German), and Proust's *Le Temps retrouvé* (in French).

8/

We also get *all* of #SherlockHolmes, finally wrestling control back from the copyright trolls who control the #ArthurConanDoyle estate. This is a firm of rent-seeking bullies who have abused the court process to extract menaces money from living creators, including rent on works that were unambiguously in the public domain.

9/

The estate's sleaziest trick is claiming that while many Sherlock Holmes stories were in the public domain, certain elements of Holmes's personality were developed in later stories that were still in copyright, and therefore any Sherlock story that contained those elements was a copyright violation.

10/

Infamously, the Doyle Estate went after the creators of the #EnolaHolmes series, claiming a copyright over Sherlock stories in which Holmes was "capable of friendship," "expressed emotion," or "respected women." This is a nonsensical theory, based on the idea that these character traits are copyrightable. They are *not*:

https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2023/#fn6text

11/

Public Domain Day 2023 | Duke University School of Law

Tweet       By Jennifer Jenkins, Director of Duke’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain January 1, 2023 is Public Domain Day: Works from 1927 are open to all! On January 1, 2023, copyrighted works from 1927 will enter the US public domain. 1  They will be free for all to copy, share, and build upon. These include Virginia Woolf’s To The Lighthouse and the final Sherlock Holmes stories by Arthur Conan Doyle, the German science-fiction film Metropolis and Alfred Hitchcock’s first thriller, compositions by Louis Armstrong and Fats Waller, and a novelty song about ice cream.

The Doyle Estate's shakedown racket took a serious body-blow in 2013, when Les Klinger - a lawyer, author and prominent Sherlockian - prevailed in court, with the judge ruling that new works based on public domain Sherlock stories were not infringing, even if some Sherlock stories remained in copyright. The estate appealed and lost again, and Klinger was awarded costs. They tried to take the case to the Supreme Court and got laughed out of the building.

12/

But as the Enola Holmes example shows, you can't keep a #CopyrightTroll down: the Doyle estate kept making up imaginary copyright laws in a desperate, grasping bid to wring more money out of living, working creators. That's gonna be a *lot* harder after Jan 1, when *The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes* enters the public domain, meaning that *every* Sherlock story will be out of copyright.

13/

One fun note about Klinger's landmark win over the Doyle estate: he took an *amazing* victory lap, commissioning an anthology of new *unauthorized* Holmes stories in 2016 called "Echoes of Sherlock Holmes":

https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Echoes-of-Sherlock-Holmes/Laurie-R-King/Sherlock-Holmes/9781681775463

I wrote a short story for it, "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Extraordinary Rendition," which was based on previously unpublished #Snowden leaks.

https://esl-bits.net/ESL.English.Listening.Short.Stories/Rendition/01/default.html

14/

Echoes of Sherlock Holmes

In a stunning follow-up to the acclaimed In the Company of Sherlock Holmes, Laurie R. King and Leslie S. Klinger present a brand-new anthology of s...

I got access to the full Snowden trove thanks to #LauraPoitras, who jointly commissioned the story from me for inclusion in the companion book for "Astro noise : a survival guide for living under total surveillance," her show at the Whitney:

https://www.si.edu/object/siris_sil_1060502

I also reported out the leaks the story was based on in a companion piece:

https://memex.craphound.com/2016/02/02/exclusive-snowden-intelligence-docs-reveal-uk-spooks-malware-checklist/

15/

Astro noise : a survival guide for living under total surveillance / Laura Poitras ; with an introduction by Jay Sanders and contributions by Ai Weiwei, Jacob Appelbaum, Lakhdar Boumedien, Kate Crawford, Alex Danchev, Cory Doctorow, Dave Eggers, Jill Magrid, Trevor Paglen, Edward Snowden, and Hito Steyerl | Smithsonian Institution

Smithsonian Institution

Jan 1, 2023 will also be a fine day for film in the public domain, with *Metropolis*, *The Jazz Singer*, and Laurel and Hardy's *Battle of the Century* entering the commons. Also notable: *Wings*, winner of the first-ever best picture Academy Award; *The Lodger*, Hitchcock's first thriller; and FW "Nosferatu" Mirnau's *Sunrise*.

16/

However most of the movies that enter the public domain next week will never be seen again. They are "lost pictures," and every known copy of them expired before their copyrights did. 1927 saw the first synchronized dialog film (*The Jazz Singer*). As talkies took over the big screen, studios all but gave up on preserving silent films, which were printed on delicate stock that needed careful tending. Today, 75% of all silent films are lost to history.

17/

But some films from this era *do* survive, and they are now in the public domain. This is true irrespective of whether they were restored at a later date. Restoration does *not* create a new copyright. "The Supreme Court has made clear that 'the sine qua non of copyright is originality.'"

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/499/340

18/

FEIST PUBLICATIONS, INC., Petitioner v. RURAL TELEPHONE SERVICE COMPANY, INC.

LII / Legal Information Institute

There's some great music entering the public domain next year! "The Best Things In Life Are Free"; "I Scream, You Scream, We All Scream for Ice-Cream"; "Puttin' On the Ritz"; "'S Wonderful"; "Ol' Man River"; "My Blue Heaven" and "Mississippi Mud."

It's a banger of a year for jazz and blues, too. We get Bessie Smith's "Back Water Blues," "Preaching the Blues," and "Foolish Man Blues." We get Louis Armstrong's "Potato Head Blues" and "Gully Low Blues."

19/

We get Jelly Roll Morton's "Billy Goat Stomp," "Hyena Stomp," and "Jungle Blues." And we get Duke Ellington's "Black and Tan Fantasy" and "East St. Louis Toodle-O."

Note that these are just the *compositions*. No new sound recordings come into the public domain in 2023, but on January 1, 2024, all of 1923's recordings will enter the public domain, with more recordings coming in every year thereafter.

20/

We're only a few years into the newly reopened public domain, but it's already bearing fruit. *The Great Gatsby* entered the public domain in 2021, triggering a rush of beautiful new editions and fresh scholarship:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/14/books/the-great-gatsby-public-domain.html

These new editions were varied and wonderful. Beehive Books produced a *stunning* edition, illustrated by the Balbusso Twins, with a new introduction by Wellesley's Prof William Cain:

https://beehivebooks.com/shop/gatsby

21/

The ‘Great Gatsby’ Glut

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic novel about America and aspiration is now in the public domain, so new editions, as well as a graphic novel and a zombie adaptation, have gotten the green light.

@pluralistic

Thanks for sharing. Amazing convoluted reasoning.It's another instance of 'The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers,'' which was stated by Dick the Butcher in ''Henry VI,'' but really was meant to refer to the corrupt lawyers. I ensued the Enola Holmes movie which the critics gave a 91%. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/enola_holmes

Enola Holmes

While searching for her missing mother, intrepid teen Enola Holmes uses her sleuthing skills to outsmart big brother Sherlock and help a runaway lord.

Rotten Tomatoes
@pluralistic Such an interesting read, thanks. I take my students in my popular music college course into the copyright conundrum, using excerpts from Siva Vaidhyanathan's book, Copyrights and Copywrongs. Your article is an excellent update on some of the same issues.
@pluralistic My only problem with this is that Agatha Christie's "The Big Four" is a terrible, terrible book. Possible the worst she ever wrote.
@mike Great! You can rewrite it now!
@pluralistic That is an excellent point! Alas, some works are beyond redemption, and The Big Four is solidly in that sector.
@mike @pluralistic Small mastodon comment -- hiding your short tweet length toots behind the "Long thread" and expando button kind of hurts my already repetitively stressed hand and your toots are so bite sized, the do not overtake the feed anyways!

@gleemie @mike
Here's a bookmarklet to open all CW posts in a thread with a single click.

https://mamot.fr/@proximacentauri@mstdn.social/109446641864950446

Proxima Centauri (@[email protected])

Attached: 3 images @[email protected] Sorry, you sound like someone has complained about this before. I made an bookmarklet, that opens all the CWs with single click: javascript:document.querySelectorAll(".status__content__spoiler-link--show-more").forEach(el => el.click()); 1. Add it to Bookmark bar 2. Thread before 3. Thread after Maybe you can give this to someone who next complains about this.

Mastodon 🐘
@pluralistic @mike thank you for that generous and patient reply. I read up the thread and saw the CW (learning the terminology) has been contentious with a few of us n00bs. I'll use this bookmarklet!

@pluralistic @gleemie @mike

If a reader is willing to dispense with CWs altogether, there's also an option in Preferences:

"Always expand posts marked with content warnings"

@gleemie @pluralistic @Plebs_Tribune @mike
The problem is that the CWs I see used range from “soz it’s from Twitter” to full NSFW nor particularly welcome nudity.
@Plebs_Tribune @pluralistic @gleemie @mike which can be combined with a filter to remove things entirely, making it less risky, as I understand it.
@gleemie @mike @pluralistic just one more note - for Tusky on Android there's a 'expand all CWs in this thread' button (the eye) in the top right corner.
Afraid I don't know if any other clients do that....
@health_data_abacus
You're a life saver! I've been trying to figure out what that button did! (And I've been using Tusky for a couple years now.)
@@pluralistic this year I published my own version of The Velveteen rabbit (66 pages). If you can get a glimpse of inside the the Penguin Random House book they have a paragraph about how they are the only officially licensed publisher whatever respecting the "copyright" and "trademark". Ummm i'm pretty sure courts do not recognize trademarks on non-serial book titles.

Anyways, everyone has published a version of The Velveteen rabbit.
@pluralistic disgusting greed, and government corruption that allowed this to happen.
@pluralistic This is why torrenting will forever remain popular.
@pluralistic I feel like copyright hardly helps creators at all, and it’s hardly worth it for all the creativity that is locked away because of it.