About a month ago, I observed that two main things I found lacking here vs. Twitter were accounts from professional creatives (artists, etc) and discussion of breaking news.

The creatives have definitely started to arrive. But the breaking news has been much slower. However, it also seems like breaking news is starting to disappear from Twitter.

I wonder what will fill that gap. Perhaps it will be here, eventually.

Up until very recently, if there was something important going on anywhere in the world, it was virtually certain to be in my Twitter feed. Not just RTs of media reports, but discussion, etc. That just doesn't seem to be true any more over there. And it's not here yet.
I suspect this has much less to do with software features, and algorithms and more to do with culture and who's come over here.
A bunch of people telling me I’m “wrong” to want, or would be “better off without” real-time access to breaking news and firsthand accounts. Maybe that’s true for you. But please don’t presume to speak for me. Not everyone wants or needs the same things.

The implication, explicitly stated or otherwise, is that if I want those things, I don’t belong here; I should go elsewhere.

I’m staying. Deal with it.

As for news, I’m honestly baffled at people who think they can prevent it from being discussed. News is, pretty much by definition, timely information that people are interested in. That’s a huge fraction of what people like to discuss. Trying to stop that in a large-scale communication system isn’t just kind of weird, it’s futile.
@mattblaze Woah! Hey, everybody. Could we please stick to discussing olds? Thanks.
@mattblaze I just followed real-time coverage of Biden/Zelensky meet here, all the while having an excited feeling of being liberated from corporate tyranny. I'm sure news will move here, it just takes a bit of time.
@alasaarela @mattblaze who do you follow for news?
@quinn @mattblaze for the current Biden/Zelensky meeting, I follow @w7voa
@mattblaze I noticed (and was sad about) the lack of much news at all. That’s changed a lot in the last week and I am starting to see that engagement with the folks reporting the news. It’s brand new but I think in the coming weeks it will be far better.
@mattblaze Fighting the good fight against... people finding out the important events that are happening in the world.

@mattblaze Okay? But if you mention the word “twitter” my filters are going to block you.

Just saying…

The question isn’t whether the news (however it is defined) should be discussed. The question is whether I should be forced into participating in someone else’s doom scrolling.

@obvioustroll yes, you should use the (rather powerful) filtering tools this platform provides! It’s one if the things that let all of us use it in ways that work best for us.

@mattblaze heh. But that raises the whole issue of social bubbles, I guess.

I just went back up the thread you’ve been writing (Previously I only saw the toot I replied to…) and I guess I understand your question about what replaces news on Twitter - but that’s a real hair ball of a problem. Even in Twitter’s heyday no one was getting “all the news”, they were getting the news that they had chosen plus some subset that Twitter’s algorithm’s had decided was commercially interesting to them.
/1

@mattblaze (I can’t believe I’m doing a multi-part toot…)

Which brings me f2f with my own convictions - I’ve always been a technoliberal of the “information wants to be free” and “the answer is always more speech” school… but how do you reconcile that with the reality of trying to stand under the firehose and absorb it all?
/2

@mattblaze To go all the way back to your original complaint (as I saw it), people inevitably try to find themselves a comfortable niche - whether physically, mentally, or on the in4rw3bz, and they’re going to get upset when reality decides to puncture their bubble. But what else can you do? (I think I’m done now…)
@mattblaze @obvioustroll So far, I occasionally feel irritated here; CW warriors and “which topics are appropriate” arbitrators are the perps. I mute them. If/when the content or topic is cruel or otherwise too extreme, I will just report and block. Refreshingly pleasant place, as is Post.News, but sometimes people just get too zealous. #DangHumans

@obvioustroll @mattblaze one person's doom scrolling is another person's area of interest or study.

Also, what's the line on news that should be filtered? JWST launch was definitely news, but I doubt few people would consider it appropriate for discussion or celebration.

The continual collapse of crypto? I'm not interested in it, but there are tons of other people who enjoy it.

Should it be good news only? Who gets to define what good news is?

@mattblaze @plasticbiker
> one person’s doom scrolling

Well, yes. Did you read my whole thread? When did I imply all people should use the same filters?

The problem is “how do we decide what is important”? Followed closely by, lwho gets to decide what is important?”

@obvioustroll @mattblaze Mastadon doesn't seem to make that possible, and I can only see the one thread where there are just two posts from you.

*shrug*

Probably doesn't help that I consume Mastadon in 8-12hr chunks, so it's sometimes hard to catch-up/follow busy threads. At least they way they are displayed to me.

@plasticbiker @mattblaze huh. Yeah, threads do seem inconsistent on mastodon.
@mattblaze I also think the algorithm where favorites don't show in your feed makes a difference - I think people had grown accustomed to a kind of three tier sharing mechanism (heart, RT, QT) and news items - especially local news items, which is where I am really feeling the loss - were more likely to show in my Twitter feed via hearts.
@mattblaze We've had a winter storm here in the Seattle area and Twitter has all kinds of up to date reports of snow levels all over town and Facebook has neighbor groups reporting on specific roads and Mastodon has none of that.
@vickyharp following the #WAWX hashtag has been good for getting a feel for weather conditions.

@mattblaze I’m quite sure this statement wasn’t intended to be a strawman argument, but it is. To gather up the torrent of disinformation , propaganda, oligarch-owned-and-driven bile and multiply-by-a-billion unthinking personal opinions and call it “news” is, itself, misinformation.

A few Socratic questions: if Twitter is such a great place, why are “News” people leaving? Arbitrary banning, muting, pile-ons, doxxing, bots, trolls and all the other pathologies have been there for years, no?
Perhaps people here don’t want “journalists” who already have huge platforms and megaphones, and oligarchs who own and run troll farms to bring “news” over here as well?
Pretending that “news” is just-the-facts-ma’am is continuing the fable.

@mattblaze My only objection to news on here or the other site is repetition. I follow multiple journalists and subscribe to multiple newspapers. It’s a cost of who I follow though - I get to see 30+ takes on Biden meeting Zelenskyy, many with similar info.

I could probably figure a way to cull this, or separate a news-reading persona, but I don’t bother. On me. Not Mastodon.

That said, I was reading my parents’ NYT in grade 6, so I love the news.

@trollball @mattblaze
Story. Like a lot of parents I was worried about when my son would learn to read. Fast forward to when he was seven and got a hold of our New York Times and asked me what oral sex was. (This was the time of the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal.)

@mattblaze I could be wrong but posts show up in federated timelines mainly because the post got boosted by enough people, right?

Or, it shows up on someone's follower's feed because that someone boosted right?

In other words, posts to non-followers show up because people (not just the OP) thought it's worth sharing. Me personally, I'd just mute/block/filter rather than asking a bunch people to not share, with the exception of things which require actual moderation like hate speech. 🤷‍♂️

@ShioyaMaki @mattblaze No. the federated timeline on your instance consists of all posts marked as Public from all local users of the instance and from any user followed by a local user. That’s it.
@mattblaze
Ukrainian war news has completely disappeared from Twitter since a week for me.
Something happened.
@mattblaze I'm hoping with bated breath that news organizations set up their own instances. If they run afoul of any instance's terms, they can defederate. I'm planning to keep my account on the most inclusive instance possible
@jonathanevans @mattblaze Me too. It seems my favourite accounts barely interact with or post on Twitter anymore, so I don’t get much value here yet, and no longer get much value there anymore…
@jonathanevans @mattblaze why r communities called instances on Mastodon. It seems like a rather clunky way to describe “community.”
@mizerello @jonathanevans it’s derived from a technical term for an individual server. And “community” isn’t quite right, since members of the same (social) communities might be on different (technical and administrative) instances.
@mattblaze @jonathanevans
Thanks! I understand it more. Getting used to the different lingo.

@mattblaze

We're glad you are here and are glad that you're staying.

Some of the nuanced conversations and perspectives are already here. But it will take a little time for some of the policy folks & experts to find us -- and then some time for the "fediverse" to find them.

But: once that is achieved and we are firmly in our groove we will be set.

We will no longer rely on the whims / vagaries of a single entity to keep a good thing going.

@mattblaze I've been glancing at my instance's Federated Timeline every once in a while and have started to notice more and more discussion of (even non-Musk-related!) current events, fwiw. Definitely agree it's not on the old-Twitter levels, but it feels like something that might be slowly fixing itself.

Maybe we should also be the change we see in the world. My current event: I just ate a great burrito! Happy to discuss.

@Zardus @mattblaze True. Makes sense giving the volume of journalism accounts that migrated over the last weeks.
@mattblaze
I share news stories on here, but my selection is tailored to my interests. I wish AP or Reuters would come aboard.
I've already encountered a few scolds admonishing people not to do the work of corporate news media. Those scolds should probably block me.
@mattblaze I agree. I'm not sure if Post thinks it's trying to build that active engagement, or if they just want to be a journo broadcast platform. I won't find out as I've bailed from it.

@mattblaze

Me, too.
In particular, since I contributing my share towards it. 😉

But then, someone who is apolitical would never follow me.

@mattblaze I put a poll on my Mastodon timeline and the majority responded they want me to post even more breaking news than I did on Twitter (where I remain suspended). On another platform (post.news) I joined there seems less enthusiasm about breaking news. I am on a journalism instance (journa.host) and plan to do my journalism things. Admins of other instances not wanting to see news can block this instance if they desire. The fediverse is diverse and rightly so.
@w7voa Please continue! I really get a lot out of your reporting and commentary.
@w7voa @mattblaze
Thank you. The thing most of us liked about Twitter was to be informed of breaking news.
As you rightly point out, if users don’t want to see it there are multiple tools to customize their feeds and experience ie blocking, muting, lists and filters.
@w7voa Please! Post breaking news! Thank you for raising the bar for journos everywhere!
@w7voa @mattblaze I'm also on post and follow you there precisely for breaking news. Keep doing what you're doing! Thank you.
@w7voa @mattblaze
please, definitely post as much and on whatever topic(s) you desire. 👍
@w7voa @mattblaze That is because post.news is boring and stodgy.

@w7voa @mattblaze

i missed the poll due to real life ™ interfering with Social .
Strong YES.

@w7voa @mattblaze
In my opinion, so long as you tag your posts and throw on a CW when you deem it appropriate, that will make it easy for folks who are not interested in seeing posts on given topics such as news, breaking or otherwise, to filter them out.
@mattblaze
#WTH is wrong w/people? I've witnessed a huge shift in common decency towards others over these many long years. We actually think it's righteous to be rude to each other! I've just started 86ing those who don't get it. I am not the idiot whisperer. #IMHO

@mattblaze
are you getting a lot of the scoldings?

i haven't seen any yet so this is a genuine question

@jbminn @mattblaze I don't think there are directed scoldings, just a lot of proclamations.
@jbminn @mattblaze I'm not seeing it either but Blaze has 21k followers so his chances of getting scolds in his mentions are greatly amplified. Sometimes I'm really glad my circle is small because honestly I will block a fool or an irritant without hesitation 😏
@mattblaze definitely missed the prior Twitter regimes 'bow wake' of news that I was expecting to see either here or there from the latest Cali earthquake

@mattblaze

Access to breaking news and commentary was one of the things that drew me to Twitter.

Having it here is necessary.

@mattblaze Just curious... are there specific accounts you're looking for that are---at least, as of yet---not represented here?
@scduende no. Published news is easy to find (here or elsewhere) if you’re looking for it or know to look. I’m talking more about firsthand accounts, developing stories, emergencies, etc.