About a month ago, I observed that two main things I found lacking here vs. Twitter were accounts from professional creatives (artists, etc) and discussion of breaking news.

The creatives have definitely started to arrive. But the breaking news has been much slower. However, it also seems like breaking news is starting to disappear from Twitter.

I wonder what will fill that gap. Perhaps it will be here, eventually.

Up until very recently, if there was something important going on anywhere in the world, it was virtually certain to be in my Twitter feed. Not just RTs of media reports, but discussion, etc. That just doesn't seem to be true any more over there. And it's not here yet.
I suspect this has much less to do with software features, and algorithms and more to do with culture and who's come over here.
A bunch of people telling me I’m “wrong” to want, or would be “better off without” real-time access to breaking news and firsthand accounts. Maybe that’s true for you. But please don’t presume to speak for me. Not everyone wants or needs the same things.

The implication, explicitly stated or otherwise, is that if I want those things, I don’t belong here; I should go elsewhere.

I’m staying. Deal with it.

@mattblaze I put a poll on my Mastodon timeline and the majority responded they want me to post even more breaking news than I did on Twitter (where I remain suspended). On another platform (post.news) I joined there seems less enthusiasm about breaking news. I am on a journalism instance (journa.host) and plan to do my journalism things. Admins of other instances not wanting to see news can block this instance if they desire. The fediverse is diverse and rightly so.
@w7voa @mattblaze
please, definitely post as much and on whatever topic(s) you desire. 👍