@paulg I plan to write a post about this... when Twitter users organically did "quote tweeting" before 2014, they used to write a reply to someone and move the '@' sign later in the text.
Like "I agree @ person: I love ice cream"
Since the @ was not at the start, such replies used to be visible to the replier's followers too
When Twitter implemented native QT they broke this concept. QTs were separate from replies which was their 'original sin' I think.
I used it from time to time to reference an older tweet of mine. That worked well for me:
One of the common uses is to criticize the content or author of the original tweet to one's audience (replies are typically hidden from main feed)
That can be a useful and effective tool for social accountability when the critique is aimed at high-status / powerful person saying or doing problematic or harmful things.
It is also frequently used for dog-piling and stochastic terrorism against marginalized people, which is often dangerous for the target.
One of the best features of Mastodon is the lack of quote-tweeting. I'd forgotten how great that was. And unfortunately for Twitter, it's a feature that they'll never be able to copy.
@paulg one more thing... That surprised me as well.
They do not have free text search. People navigate via hashtags . Apparently that's also by design.
You may not have an issue with it (large account) , but if you do talk about a topic, it would be really helpful for people if you tag it.
Eg: you could start a #PressByPaulg for just your press answers... And journalists could follow just that hashtag .
@paulg Yeah, the lack of dunking here is a real plus. Some people complain they miss it, but the benefits outweigh the shortcomings. Dialogue here is generally much healthier too due to the lack of algorithms promoting contentious hashtags and 'popular' subjects.
Welcome to Mastodon.
@paulg I saw a thread that explained why quote-tooting should be added to Mastodon, and I mostly agree.
If quote-tooting was already a thing, I'd link it here.
@paulg Interesting. It's one of the features I miss the most. Someone said it was purposefully lacking because it doesn't contribute to conversations.
What's your take?
I assume this is a front end feature. One can just build a front end that renders a tweet with a link in it as a quote tweet.
If one wanted.
If you're inclined, you can dump the full URL of a Toot into your own Toot; essentially quoting it like any other URL-identified resource. The ergonomics isn't quite "quote tweet" but for occasionally writing a Toot which references another Toot (rather than replying to it), it ought to do the job.
You can't prevent people from quoting you on the Internet such that you don't know about it.