This is a bad look for the NY Times. Don’t beg Elon to allow your reporter back. That place is fatally corrupted.
Better idea: start your own Mastodon instance.
This is a bad look for the NY Times. Don’t beg Elon to allow your reporter back. That place is fatally corrupted.
Better idea: start your own Mastodon instance.
Precisely. Every action taken on Twitter, whether as a producer or a consumer (writer or reader) is literally the product of Twitter.
https://robertsonp.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-the-twitter-quitter
I am disappointed by the statement released today by members of Twitter’s former Trust and Safety Council. It betrays a naïveté about the nature of #Twitter.Twitter is a corporation and in a corpor...
@Mauigirl52 @JamesGleick It's dreadful to see the NYT's decline. From Judy Miller plugging "weapons of mass destruction" to Thrush, Choznick and others pushing "But her emails" in 2016 to Maggie Haberman assuming the role of Trump whisperer to Aaron Blake praising DeSantis for his autocratic form of state governance, it's been a rapid descent for the paper into being a mouthpiece for the RNC.
I'll take a look as the WSJ's news section.
Why leaving Twitter is now a must:
https://robertsonp.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-the-twitter-quitter
@MarkBignell @JamesGleick I refuse to follow musk, but do want to see the stupid polls he posts.
I wish there was an account I could sub to that links to his “polls”.
Sigh, these polls are probably one of the most idiotic ways he could make platform decisions. It’s not only mob rule and transparently leading questions, but also a self-selecting group of biased participants.
I doubt would be that much, especially if the Times limits itself to their own reporters and editorial staff. Heck, law blogger Teri Kanefield's husband spun up her own Instance pretty quickly. That should be easily within the capabilities of the IT department of one of the biggest newspapers in the world.
@JamesGleick I think it's completely reasonable for NYT to release the statement they did. That's part of the "good fight". Sure, they can make a mastodon account, and probably should, but I'm still happy to see high-profile pushback against the Musketeer.
Anything to drag his name through the mud and get the public to question what he's doing.
@JamesGleick WaPo, too. They should pull their ads snd so forth.
But these orgs put their reporters in cages in concert with Trump, rather than refuse to go along with it. They are not good orgs.
@JamesGleick They all just need to leave. It's turning into rubbernecking an accident and that just causes its own problems.
As they learned on the Simpsons when the advertisements came to life, the only way to kill them was "Just don't look"
Confirming to the bully that they have all the power always ends well
This is what Elon wants.
Journalists supplicating and prostrating for attention and table scraps.
All journalists should close their accounts and get the hell off of twitter.
Aye
"Please please please let us share a platform with all your nazi friends"
— The New York Times
Attached: 1 image · Content warning: Elon Bird site Sad
@JamesGleick One would hope these papers issue these statements as they would to an Iran, a Russia, a White House that has expelled them or not let them into a presser. Then it might be justified -- there was a beat to cover, they were prevented from covering it by X.
But that's not the tone. The tone is more like, "You are preventing us from using the tool of our trade. We are a guild that absolutely requires this tool or we can't be a guild worth its name."
An instance wdn't fix that problem