@lauren @jeffjarvis Mastodon still can't handle influx of masses if suddenly 10 million more wanted to join.
There is no generic server which registration form one could point users to go. Main servers seem to have closed registration, and joining through joinmastodon.org is very confusing for regular people. It's like choosing your guild first, and then figuring out where the registration happens.
Mastodon could use more generic servers for those who are not in to guilds.
Hi Lauren, what are, in your opinion, the main barriers when people try to join #Mastodon? (I found it pretty simple.)
@dermedientyp @Ciantic @jeffjarvis There are a bunch of them. Most people just want to go to a site -- like Twitter or even Post for that matter, and with a couple of clicks get going.
With Mastodon now you start with lists of sites ostensibly focusing on different things, you don't really know who is running them or how stable they are, when you try to join one you find it's closed, or slow, or they put you on a waiting list of unknown duration, etc., etc. Not a good UX, frankly.
When you try to follow someone based on their handle you may find yourself on a page telling you to copy/paste into the search bar of another instance, and if you change instances you effectively lose your identity.
A one-stop onboarding process combined with handle portability/aliasing would go a long way toward making this platform accessible to far more busy nontechies, who right now are stuck on the hate speech site known as #Twitter .
@lauren @TransitBiker @dermedientyp @Ciantic @[email protected] consider that assuming asking a non-technical user to learn a small amount about a community they are joining is an insurmountable obstacle seems pretty disrespectful of peopleās general ability to learn and adapt
The late-stage capitalism choices to spoon feed users a specific way of interacting disrespects the users and takes away important choices. Duplicating this is, IMO, not something we should aspire to. People are smarter than youāre giving them credit for, and itās deeply unfair to suggest undermining deliberate and valuable design decisions simply to remove a small amount of friction
@lauren @TransitBiker @dermedientyp @Ciantic I have been helping people do things online, including teaching the elderly, since the 90s.
And my experience is that things like joining Mastodon are plenty easy for people to grasp, as long as those guiding donāt over complicate it. Itās easier to get started on the Fediverse today than it was to get onto Facebook during the heyday of its growth. Itās far easier to join the Fediverse and have a decent experience than it is to do almost anything these folks have taught themselves to do in the past couple of years.
The issue isnāt at all that itās difficult! Itās that people approach the topic without care and empathy and make it seem scary.
@calcifer @lauren @TransitBiker @dermedientyp @Ciantic is the confusion linked to the difference in the underlying paradigms between Twitter and Fedi? People expecting to find a website and then running into a directory of different communities instead?
Instances are neighbourhoods. Pick where you want to live. Do a bit of research on what the place is like first. And you can move anytime you like.
@TransitBiker @lauren @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
āThe app has a clear step by step processā
Which app would that be? Where? How does it explain the process? How do they find it?
Also, the whole āfind an instance that matches your interestsā thing makes no sense to most people. Never mind how they find it. Which interests? Most people donāt walk around defining themselves as belonging to one community with one set of interests. I chose Infosec because I knew Iād know some people here. I knew theyād share common interests and values. And that would likely make it stable and a safe place to post. The fact that they post about things Iām interested in was secondary and really not relevantābecause I can follow them from anywhere. How did I know that? Because I spent 40 years on Twitter and G+ and mailing lists and USENET with some of them. Arrogance is thinking this process is easy and well defined for people who donāt spend 90% of their free time online.
And all that is before we get to things like, āWhen should I make a reply public vs. limited and how do I know who will see a limited reply and when?ā
@nazgul @TransitBiker @lauren @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
I do agree that people need help with onboarding, I asked around before I landed here.
But thatās no different from how I would find a lawyer, mobile phone provider or a sport club. We who are here and settled should willingly and patiently offer help, rather than risk streamlining the process so much that we are back to a monolith.
@steely_glint @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
I honestly donāt know what āas simple as possible but no simplerā means.
Typically what weād say is that we want to make it easy for those who donāt want to give it thought, but still allow customization and decisions if you care.
But you seem to be going a step further and saying people should have to do work to join, because otherwise the difficulty of the rest of the experience will be unexpected.
Isnāt the right approach to that saying, āafter we make it easier to onboard, we should make it easier to useā?
Iām not sure what youāre worried about here.
@nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
It's a -simplified- quote from Albert Einstein.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05004-4
The essence of this place is that it doesn't automate decisions for you, you get to make the choices.
The onboarding should reflect that.
@steely_glint @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
@nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
We will have to agree to disagree.
I don't believe that expecting people to make choices is elitist.
Hoarding the necessary information to make those choices is.
So is needlessly over-complicating them.
@steely_glint @nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
TL;DR: Agree with Lauren. Onboarding needs improvement. Better than it was. Let's avoid another "eternal September."
I have to agree with Lauren. A thread.
Remember that many people are somewhat computer illiterate, even in 2022.
Some examples.
In a job I had before I retired 4 years ago, many of the end user community would conflate the computer on their desk with the server in the back room. 1/6
@steely_glint @nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic They knew which buttons to press on the screen. Changing how the screen was laid out might cause them to not be able to do their job until someone explained the new layout.
A friend of a friend just got their first smart phone the other day. Yes, in 2022. They had had a cell phone previously, but with just a small screen. My friend is now trying to get their friend to try text messaging. 2/6
@steely_glint @nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic Yes, we do not want to create an "eternal September", like some of us saw a long time ago on USENET, by just dumping users on mastodon. Here's a reference: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September
I think that may be what Tim and others are concerned about. 4/6
@steely_glint @nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic But at the same time, the onboarding process here could use some streamlining versus what I remember doing a month and a half ago. No, sorry, I wasn't taking notes a month and a half ago. So I don't remember the exact process.
So, just to experience a current version of the process, I tried https://joinmastodon.org. I didn't actually create an account. 5/6
@steely_glint @nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
Here's an article about #disability on Twitter and how users in that community are staying there. The article is short on details about barriers to entry for Mastodon.
https://www.inquirer.com/health/twitter-elon-musk-disability-social-media-20221206.html
@lauren @setha45 @steely_glint @nazgul @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp
There is instance: https://disabled.social/ it is only month old, has now 3k users. It's ran by @McCullohMD
Yes, some are planning migration clearly.
@steely_glint @nazgul @lauren @TransitBiker @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
There are opportunities to simplify the onboarding process while still requiring individual choice .
A better launch page would be a huge improvement. As a small example "instance" or "server" has no intuitive meaning to a non-tech person. Something like "Home Base" would be better: "Choose your Home Base and from there, you can see entire Fediverse." People can understand a Home Base.
@SeaGoatGirl
Yes, I agree that language/guidance should be improved, although it isn't easy.
Home Base is a DIY chain store in the UK, so that particular term means something _quite_ else to someone who grew up in a non-baseball nation.
'Community' or 'Club' feel closest - or perhaps 'mastodon affiliate' is clearer.
@TransitBiker @lauren @daskeit @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic They donāt, and they arenāt stupid. Theyāll just go somewhere thatās easier (and therefore full of all that toxicity). People choose convenience. Over and over and over.
If Mastodon (and itās users) really do care about the values they often espouse, they would *want* to make onboarding effortless so that people donāt have to suffer the likes of the other profit-motivated sites.
@lauren @TransitBiker @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic
itās not that they donāt deserve to be here. (Theyāre welcome!) Itās that they deserve to make choices for themselves.
The flip side of having agency is the effort of exercising agency in a meaningful way. All weāre discussing here is choosing an instance. Right? Would you move into a place without checking it out first?
How is that arrogance?
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] āThe app has a clear step by step processā Which app would that be? Where? How does it explain the process? How do they find it? Also, the whole āfind an instance that matches your interestsā thing makes no sense to most people. Never mind how they find it. Which interests? Most people donāt walk around defining themselves as belonging to one community with one set of interests. I chose Infosec because I knew Iād know some people here. I knew theyād share common interests and values. And that would likely make it stable and a safe place to post. The fact that they post about things Iām interested in was secondary and really not relevantābecause I can follow them from anywhere. How did I know that? Because I spent 40 years on Twitter and G+ and mailing lists and USENET with some of them. Arrogance is thinking this process is easy and well defined for people who donāt spend 90% of their free time online. And all that is before we get to things like, āWhen should I make a reply public vs. limited and how do I know who will see a limited reply and when?ā
@lauren @daskeit @TransitBiker @calcifer @dermedientyp @Ciantic Speaking from my own experience, I did the joinmastodon.org thing and, lacking any specific "interest" or "community" I could find on the list, chose a medium-largish instance for stability. And then did a lot of debirdify to locate people I knew.
But I'm a fairly savvy IT guy. I would never suggest to less-techy family members that they just wing it; I'd want to help them onto the experience. It's not easy.