@PennyOaken @t @dansinker ugh I know the ones :(
"Why do you have to hold both of these handles to operate the press? Let me just tie one down." All fun and games until you get crushed to death.
@alexhammy209 @PennyOaken @t @dansinker
How about “you have to discuss governance issues in terms of effects they care about rather than abstractions”?
@PennyOaken @alexhammy209 @t @dansinker
Most people don't care about politics, but democracy is still worth fighting for because the alternative is worse.
Good governance itself is boring, but the stuff it defends isn't boring at all.
Also might be nice if it wasn't a nazi incel hive
@ankaracode @copiesofcopies @dansinker *used to teach it
thus the ongoing collapse
@copiesofcopies @dansinker Getting people to understand that a nice experience is contingent on user participation and underlying infrastructure is one of those frustrating battles. "Ignorance is bliss" is too strong. There will always be a coterie of self-selected, highly interested folks who try to balance optimization with the opiate of the masses.
As a civics teacher, teaching kids how government impacts EVERYTHING they care about is the key to engagement.
@copiesofcopies I do periodic current events days with a protocol that's all about processing what the event is (facts, questions, comments, feelings), why they personally care about it (identity intersections), & civics/govt intersections (curriculum tie-in and personal action possibilities).
Even in weeks like this where most of them just want to talk about the World Cup, there's a wealth of civics/govt connections that get them really engaged and worked up.
True, most people don't care about the work and thought that goes into designing the things they use.
However, there's always a lot of work and thought that goes into designing complex, useful things that are intuitive to use.
I'm sorry the discussions about how to run mastodon are tiresome for you. I really appreciate the community involvement in figuring out how to make this work best for everyone.
The other option is is worse.
@dansinker but what about the rest of the people? Those who do care about decentralization and governance models?
Why should they even consider these "most" people?
Most people aren't beekeepers, they just want honey in their yoghurt. Yet here I am, a passionate beekeeper. Is that stupid? Am I wrong keeping my own bees, just because most people aren't interested in becoming a beekeeper?
@dansinker Yeah, on the surface, you're probably right. But when people start to see what's possible outside of the walled garden, and the things they couldn't do before, the experience can be really liberating. Many of the boundaries on centralized services are totally artificial, and exist just to keep people fenced in.
The technical stuff is more important for the people who are running the different parts to make this not a total hellscape.