Stop thinking about how to help newspapers. Start thinking about how to help communities and culture speaking for themselves. This is a place to start.
Pitch it as “community collaboration infrastructure and sustainability” not “federation” if necessary.
@jeffjarvis
> Well, as the Fediverse--not to mention Linux, WordPress, et al--demonstrate, open-source development is sustainable.
I agree with your overall point and you give some good examples of open source developing going well, but a word of caution. There are also plenty of stories of it not going some well. Chandler is an infamous one, where one rich guy threw a lot of money into kickstarting development but it still failed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandler_%28software%29
(1/)
@jeffjarvis I think Baldur Bjarnason nailed the key reason for successes and failures in his new book; software is an ongoing social process, not a manufactured widget (as Musk is learning):
> Software is the insights of the development team made manifest. Software has no life on its own but exists as a kind of cyborg simultaneously in the programmers and the code. To reuse Donna Haraway’s words, software is simultaneously fiercely material and irreducibly imaginary
@jeffjarvis
> For example: @alex is seeing security vulnerabilities in this Fediverse
Be great if you could link to some examples of Alex doing that, I'm keen to know more.
Good question @DrJimRawson . The way funding tends to happen in non-commercial open source development is that funding organizations serve as rain barrels. Funders drop rain dollars into those barrels, and they give as many projects groups a drink as they can, depending how much rain has fallen that year. In a sense, it doesn't matter which open source org funds go to, as long as those funds they're clearly earmarked for fediverse development.
(1/2)
One approach would be to talk to the developers of fediverse software, past and present,@vicuzumeri
(most of them are here somewhere), and ask which organizations they got funding through. Some of the funders I'm aware of include NLNet:
https://nlnet.nl/propose/
... and the Next Generation Internet fund in the EU:
https://www.ngi.eu/
There's a list of resources here about funding free code, assembled by folks active here:
https://codeberg.org/teaserbot-labs/delightful-funding/
@strypey @DrJimRawson @jeffjarvis
All good ideas. I am just some rando guy in Toronto, so my ideas are just that ... ideas.
But if just 2 or 3 connected movers and shakers got organized (that may already be happening), the problem is not a particularly difficult one.
The money should be available. The motivation in the tech industry is palpable. I'm betting there are some top flight devs and designers that would consider projects in this space to be Missions from God (in the Blues Brothers sense).
I would suggest approaching the leaders of successful open source ecosystems for guidance and possibly talent.
Apache Foundation. Linux Foundation. Hyperledger Foundation. Maybe also Github (aka Microsoft).
They have been down parts of this road already and become successful. I am sure that there are some experts who are at least slightly aware of the issues & threats facing social media and would offer to help.
Just my $0.00002
@BertL I agree with you about funding media organizations that employ journalists, but...
> you never know if what you are reading is true or a blatant lie and too much of the "news" is really propaganda.
... is just as accurate of most of them as it is of social media. For example, have a look through all the stories here about Mastodon and the fediverse from edited publications:
https://pad.disroot.org/p/fediverse-on-the-web
You've been here long enough to recognize that most of them are garbage.
@jeffjarvis Now that we're awake - time for action.
Mocking the Tesla idiot is fun & all, but time to show we actually have a leg up on him.
Oh, and start with the basics. A home.
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗘𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 will be the first t-shirt I offer from our new instance's merch page :)
@originalspin @jeffjarvis 1/2 Counterpoint: the fediverse was home to everyone who was marginalized in every other mainstream platform before, and they deserve to not have their established norms wiped out by an influx of new users.
As it is I'm struggling with how some of the most basic courtesies outlined in this guide https://github.com/joyeusenoelle/GuideToMastodon are so often either innocently overlooked or disdainfully dismissed are not being adopted by the #NewHere. Part of that is there aren't enough old
@originalspin @jeffjarvis 2/2 guard to individually remind all the new folks that there are some established norms that maybe they should be aware of. And people are too used to jumping in first, researching later.
I'm not even referring to CWs - those standards vary wildly over the site and the linked guide includes "Eye contact" which I personally find extreme, YMMV. But basic things like the need and expectation of alt-text descriptions for all images, that #accessibility should be inherent.
@jeffjarvis Totally agree. Also public funders (I'm from Europe).
But I don't think it has to be a choice between top down vs community driven and emergent. #Fediverse is a great case where the mission-driven approach, proposed by Mazzucato, could be deployed. Mission is a shared vision with clear and shared goals, but which can be achieve through a broad range of varied, not necessarily coordinated action.
The shared vision bit is crucial. Especially that we are already seeing strong disagreements on core functionalities and features of the ecosystem. Hopefully some funder will also fund citizen panels and other forms of participatory governance.
@jeffjarvis don't mind me, just curating. I'll delete if unwelcome!
#mastodon #MastodonFuture #moderation #ModerationIsWork #twitterMigration #BlackTwitter #BlackMastodon #SocialMedia
@craignewmark @jeffjarvis Are you thinking about a way to investigate and help others understand efforts or a specific platform support 501c3? I dunno about Jeff, but the more I see the strain that Mastodon instances admins' are under, I have been thinking more and more about the need to compensate them for their work to keep this corner of social platforms more maintainable.
I worry that we're replicating the mistake many make about moderation not having value.