@jonossaseuraava @grumpygamer came here to say this (schedule messages).
Even if the message didn't necessitate a response, sending outside of work hours can suggest an expectation that your team is working then (because you are).
@grumpygamer 👏👏👏
The power dynamic is at play in an interaction like this that is hidden to the person holding the power.
I'd add - don't send your employees messages like "got a second to talk?" that don't also provide context! Anyone that's been in a toxic work environment likely has PTSD from such messages 😂
@Berzerkraccoon @grumpygamer yeah absolutely. It's probably my politics but I find myself hypervigilant of labor power dynamics - the context and trust between the people engaged in an interaction like this plays a huge part in the level of anxiety that something like this triggers which is why I prefer to avoid it altogether.
"Got a sec to chat about something cool?" Is the same level of effort but in the context of a power dynamic has less of a chilling effect!
@saga @grumpygamer Due to previous very negative experiences, I do care about those dynamics a lot, and I love to see your posts on this subject, and also, what you do to avoid those dynamics and effects.
Just like your example, I’ve tried to be more explicit about the “why” - “Do you have a minute to talk about [x]?”. And sometimes, be even more explicit about “Nothing to worry about, I just need your input on this.”
I send everyone this as soon as they start with the "hi" or "got a moment" bullshit:
https://therealadam.com/2021/11/01/dont-be-spooky/
@alexcg That second point is so important too. I had a previous boss that would either call me when I was off or wait until he was about to leave on Friday to tell me he was upset about something one of my employees did weeks ago and never mentioned until now.
So now not only is it harder for me to address the issue with my employee because it was something that happened weeks ago but I get to spend my entire weekend or day off worrying about it. 
@alexcg Yeah I think my manager probably thought the same thing. It wasn't until shortly before he left and I mentioned that I didn't think I was good at managing that he suddenly realized the only feedback he had ever given me about my management was when he was complaining about my employees.
From his perspective he was thinking "You're so good, I hardly ever have to even say anything." But what I got was "The only things he ever says are negative so he must think I'm terrible at this."
@liamsora pretty tired now, so can't give a decent response. But nice to meet someone in a similar situation.
Well, "nice" I guess. I wish nobody ever had to go through this bullshit. But misery breeds something or other
(Damn, work events take a toll)
I actually got into a heated fight with a subcontractor once, who did not for the life of his understand that I do not want to answer questions or discuss invoicing over WhatsApp at 10 p.m. "You don't have to reply," they said, "I'll forget that by morning," they said. It drove me mad, really, because not only did I see the message nonetheless, but also of course thought about it right before bed, often causing me to not fall asleep at all.
@grumpygamer
On the other hand if your boss doesn't really comprehend what you do for a living pose theoretical or technical questions at random times between midnight and 3:00AM.
"I'm setting up a new DB server, do you prefer MyISAM or Innodb?"
"Should we put our Active Directory in Azure or keep it local?"
"Do we have budget for a new FangleGadget? The old FangleGadget is showing its age by smoking at bit."
Sending the subtle message, "I'm working while you are asleep at the wheel."
Especially in the age of scheduled send. Work whenever you want. But schedule your email to arrive first thing in the shift for your employees.
This is easier than ever these days; Slack and Outlook both have "send during working hours" options, with almost no effort I can still have my random weekend thoughts and at the same time honor other people's off time.
Also true if you're a senior peer.